[feat]Eminent Authority

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

bengeldorn

Apr 20, 2006 8:16:11
Based on the ongoing discussion in this thread and especially on Jon's comment I thought I'd give it a try create such a feat.

Eminent Authority
You are endowed with higher secular authority, despite your focus outside the templarate.
Prerequisites: Secular Authority, Diplomacy 4 ranks
Benefit: Your effective templar level for the secular authority ability increases by 4. This benefit can't increase your templar level higher than your Hit Dice. However, even if you can't benefit from the full bonus immediatelly, if you later gain Hit Dice in levels of nontemplar classes, you might be able to apply the rest of the bonus.
For example, a human 5th-level templar/3rd level fighter who selects this feat would increase his templar level for secular authority from 5th to 8th (since he has 8 Hit Dice). If he later gained a fighter level, he would gain the remainder of the bonus and his templar level for secual authority would become 9th (since he now has 9 Hit Dice).
This feat does not effect your spellcaster level, your spells per day, your spells known, your turn/rebuke undead ability, or the amount of times per day you can use your secual authority ability. It increases your effective templar level for the extent of your secular authority ability while within your city-state, allowing you to preform actions using your secular authority as if you were a templar of higher level.
Special: You may take this feat multiple times. Its effects stack.
#2

kalthandrix

Apr 20, 2006 9:30:44
I like it!

That’s all I got- I think this would fill a gap in the current mechanic and having it based on actual templar levels is a good step.
#3

bengeldorn

Apr 20, 2006 9:48:57
I like it!

That’s all I got- I think this would fill a gap in the current mechanic and having it based on actual templar levels is a good step.

Thanks for the nice reply. I'm still thinking bout how this sentce could be worded better, though:
It increases your templar level for determining what you can do with the secular authority ability.

#4

kalthandrix

Apr 20, 2006 11:04:40
If it is wording you are worried about, you could just adapt the Practiced Spellcaster feat language to fit this feat.
#5

bengeldorn

Apr 20, 2006 11:12:53
If it is wording you are worried about, you could just adapt the Practiced Spellcaster feat language to fit this feat.

That's what I did, but this part doesn't match mechanically, so I needed to reword it, but I'm not quite happy as it is now.
#6

kalthandrix

Apr 20, 2006 11:31:38
Maybe-

It increases the effective templar level for determining the extent of the templar's secular authority ability while within their city-state, allowing them to preform actions using their secular authority as if they were a higher level templar.

It is not as good as I think it could be but...
#7

brun01

Apr 20, 2006 11:49:24
Good one Bengeldorn! Just one thing...

Benefit: Your templar level for the secular authority ability increases by 4.

#8

kalthandrix

Apr 20, 2006 11:55:18
That is why I had wrote in my suggestion as "effective" level. Removes confusion.
#9

bengeldorn

Apr 20, 2006 12:07:28
Thanks for the input, I edited my post.
@Kalthandrix: I took your sentence (with some changes). I think it's better than the old one, but maybe someone has yet another idea for it. IMHO it still could sound better. No offense. I appriciate your help with this.
#10

jon_oracle_of_athas

Apr 20, 2006 12:41:33
I´m not sure about the Diplomacy 4 ranks requirement. I think Diplomacy 1 rank is sufficient. The wording we can redo later, the content is what matters to me.
#11

Pennarin

Apr 20, 2006 12:55:33
The name of the feat, IMO, needs to be better, as "accredited" is a bit vague.

Also the fluff would, again IMO, this time around benefit from a bit more description. Just like the descriptive text for each ability score in the PHB mentions the myriads of things that score represents in the game, the feat could mention the myriads of ways where the "accreditation" could come from.
#12

bengeldorn

Apr 20, 2006 12:58:24
I´m not sure about the Diplomacy 4 ranks requirement. I think Diplomacy 1 rank is sufficient. The wording we can redo later, the content is what matters to me.

Maybe the Diplomacy requirement could be dropped completly, as the benefits of this feat to the secular ability only come with sufficient ranks in Diplomacy? The reason why I kept the 4 ranks Diplomacy ranks as prerequisite was, that I thought only those who have some degrees of expirience in that skill should be able to gain such a benefit.
The name of the feat, IMO, needs to be better, as "accredited" is a bit vague.

I'm open for suggestions, but I like "accredited" and "practiced" doesn't make any sense IMHO.

Also the fluff would, again IMO, this time around benefit from a bit more description. Just like the descriptive text for each ability score in the PHB mentions the myriads of things that score represents in the game, the feat could mention the myriads of ways where the "accreditation" could come from.

Again, any help is welcomed. English is not my native language so don't expect any poems from my side. :P
#13

methvezem

Apr 20, 2006 19:12:24
Again, any help is welcomed. English is not my native language so don't expect any poems from my side. :P

Amen to that! :D
Same situation for me, but most here on the boards don't seem to care if we do our best, and the idea we try to bring forth sounds interesting; two things which I personnaly appreciate.

About your feat: I think its a good addition, useful for the SK's important and powerful servants that are not directly answering to the templarates.
#14

mystictheurge

Apr 20, 2006 19:37:15
"Eminent Authority"
#15

kalthandrix

Apr 20, 2006 20:27:13
I like that one and can come up with nothing better (even looked up words in theraurus).

Gets my vote.
#16

bengeldorn

Apr 21, 2006 5:44:42
I like that one and can come up with nothing better (even looked up words in theraurus).

Gets my vote.

Do you mean Eminent Authority or Accredited Authority?
#17

kalthandrix

Apr 21, 2006 7:01:46
Eminent Authority --> It just sounds slightly more 'authoritative'.
#18

bengeldorn

Apr 21, 2006 7:06:53
Eminent Authority --> It just sounds slightly more 'authoritative'.

Ok...that would be 2 votes for Eminent Authotity, 1 against Accredited Authority -> Name changed!
#19

brun01

Apr 21, 2006 12:16:55
I liked accredited better...
#20

bengeldorn

Apr 21, 2006 12:23:51
I liked accredited better...

Well, search for more votes! Now it is:
Pro Eminent: 2
Contra Eminent: 0
Pro Accredited: 2
Contra Accredited: 1

Those who are listed in Pro aren't in Contra.
#21

Oninotaki

Apr 21, 2006 13:57:28
how about these ideas:
Monarchs representative
Monarchs backing
Monarchs authority
Servants Authority
Authority of the favored
Buericratic(sp?) connections


a little diffrent but it might help to get the creative juices flowing, oh and yes I do love the feat:D
#22

Pennarin

Apr 21, 2006 15:31:56
Favoured Authority
#23

jon_oracle_of_athas

Apr 21, 2006 15:54:54
Improved Authority?
Greater Authority?

They stay in line with existing terms.
#24

the_peacebringer

Apr 21, 2006 16:04:37
Eminent authority sounds good.
#25

Pennarin

Apr 21, 2006 18:55:05
Please consider this: If the monarch indeed bestows more authority on his templar, representing the additional 4 levels, then it should be authority the monarch can bestow on any templar, not just those that are multiclassed.
Since such a setup would cause trouble, and such a feat is clearly designed to benefit multiclassed templars, I'd say this feat should say that the monarch bestows more authority than you should nromally get, and require something like a Charisma prerequisite, which is normally found in feats related to a boon steming from a higher power.
I.e. the monarch only bestows this boon of higher authority on those that have the strength of personality for it, (read the player can only take the feat if he's worthy/has the high Charisma).

How about this? :

Bengeldorn's Feat
You are endowed with a secular authority as effective as your higher-ranking templar brethren.
Prerequisites: ...
Benefit: ...
Special: ...
#26

kalthandrix

Apr 21, 2006 19:21:16
Bengeldorn's Feat

Who or what the heck is a Bengeldorn?
#27

mystictheurge

Apr 21, 2006 21:54:05
Who or what the heck is a Bengeldorn?

That'd be the OP ;)
#28

bengeldorn

Apr 21, 2006 21:58:14
Who or what the heck is a Bengeldorn?

I don't know.....but it sounds familiar. ;)
Please consider this: If the monarch indeed bestows more authority on his templar, representing the additional 4 levels, then it should be authority the monarch can bestow on any templar, not just those that are multiclassed.
Since such a setup would cause trouble, and such a feat is clearly designed to benefit multiclassed templars, I'd say this feat should say that the monarch bestows more authority than you should nromally get, and require something like a Charisma prerequisite, which is normally found in feats related to a boon steming from a higher power.

Well, the mechanics are based on the practiced spellcaster feat. There, multiclassed spellcaster are the ones the benefit from it. I think it's a matter of regulating the mechanics, I wouldn't change it. I can't remember that allows you to get class features of a class you posses but who's level you couldn't poses (be it class level or character level).

Improved Authority?
Greater Authority?

They stay in line with existing terms.

I don't know, but I guess there could be feats designed with those names, that do something different, for example give new features for secular authority.

Preliminary election result:
Pro Eminent Authority: 3
Contra Eminent Authority: 0
Pro Accredited Authority: 2
Contra Accredited Authority: 0
Pro Favoured Authority: 1
Contra Favoured Authority: 0

I didn't name the other suggestions, as I couldn't see what the actual vote is, but those who have allready voted, can still change their vote.
#29

kalthandrix

Apr 21, 2006 22:09:17
That'd be the OP ;)

?The One Power? - Wrong system. How quit playing with me and and tell me what the heck it is, please!
#30

bengeldorn

Apr 21, 2006 22:13:09
?The One Power? - Wrong system. How quit playing with me and and tell me what the heck it is, please!

I think it means Original Poster.
#31

kalthandrix

Apr 21, 2006 22:23:46
I think it means Original Poster.

WOW- I need to lay off the lead paint chips and put my cans of compressed air away!!

Sorry B- you know your one of my German homies!

[crawls under bed for more paint]
#32

bengeldorn

Apr 21, 2006 22:26:58
WOW- I need to lay off the lead paint chips and put my cans of compressed air away!!

Sorry B- you know your one of my German homies!

[crawls under bed for more paint]

Don't worry..we all have once in a while one of these moments. ;)
#33

jon_oracle_of_athas

Apr 22, 2006 2:29:34
The intent of the feat is to allow multi-class templars to keep up with their templar colleagues. If the feat allows you to exceed your character level for secular authority priveleges, then you haven't solved the problem, since ordinary templars could take the feat and keep ahead.
#34

Pennarin

Apr 22, 2006 3:55:27
The intent of the feat is to allow multi-class templars to keep up with their templar colleagues. If the feat allows you to exceed your character level for secular authority priveleges, then you haven't solved the problem, since ordinary templars could take the feat and keep ahead.

That's it, what I meant. My side of it is that the introductory fluff should reflect this, unless you want to have your players think a multiclassed templar is actually more favoured or accredited than a full-fledged one if he takes that feat.
#35

bengeldorn

Apr 22, 2006 7:12:31
That's it, what I meant. My side of it is that the introductory fluff should reflect this, unless you want to have your players think a multiclassed templar is actually more favoured or accredited than a full-fledged one if he takes that feat.

I think I now get you. You are only talking of the introduction of the feat (The text between the Name and Prerequsite) and not of the mechanics of the feat. You're saying, that if the text stays as the way it is, people might think, that multiclassed templar are more powerfull than characters with the templar class only. But if you think that the original text would imply that, yours could imply that every multiclassed templar could use his secular authority as a templar with equal class levels in the templar class than the multiclassed character would have in character levels. And this is not quite correct. Your effictive templar level for determining your abilities of secular authority increase only by 4 levels.

There is still a problem, I see with this feat or the secular authority class feature. Characters, who don't have diplomacy as a class skill, would have it very hard to fullfill the needed ranks for the secular authority abilities, whilst those, who have Diplomacy as a class skill (like cleric), would be favored. Maybe another feat, that would have secular authority as a prerequisite and provide having the diplomacy skill as a class skill for one or all classes, could solve this problem. What do you think?
#36

mystictheurge

Apr 22, 2006 7:17:19
There is still a problem, I see with this feat or the secular authority class feature. Characters, who don't have diplomacy as a class skill, would have it very hard to fullfill the needed ranks for the secular authority abilities, whilst those, who have Diplomacy as a class skill (like cleric), would be favored. Maybe another feat, that would have secular authority as a prerequisite and provide having the diplomacy skill as a class skill for one or all classes, could solve this problem. What do you think?

Keep in mind, once Diplomacy is a class skill, it's always a class skill with regards to max ranks. This just means a multi-class templar who wants to maintain his secular authority will have to spend two skill points per rank of diplomacy. I see no problem with this, as it ought to take extra effort for a templar who is not primarily a templar to match one who is. After all they're getting some other benefit for multiclassing.
#37

nytcrawlr

Apr 22, 2006 7:42:08
Yeah, let's not go out of our way to make multiclassing just as equal with single-classed characters in regards to secular authority, otherwise the system is going to start breaking down pretty quickly.

What you have so far is fine minus the flavor text issues and multiclass characters should be less effective in Diplomacy if it isn't a class skill, that's kinda the whole point of wanting to take a class that has it as a class skill.
#38

bengeldorn

Apr 22, 2006 8:08:19
Yeah, let's not go out of way to make multiclassing just as equal with single-classed characters in regards to secular authority, otherwise the system is going to start breaking down pretty quickly.

What you have so far is fine minus the flavor text issues and multiclass characters should be less effective in Diplomacy if it isn't a class skill, that's kinda the whole point of wanting to take a class that has it as a class skill.

Ok
#39

Pennarin

Apr 22, 2006 14:32:18
Yeah, my fluff is not up to par yet.

v2.0:
You are endowed with a higher secular authority than your rank would normally permit.

#40

bengeldorn

Apr 22, 2006 20:40:57
Yeah, my fluff is not up to par yet.

v2.0:
You are endowed with a higher secular authority than your rank would normally permit.


Sounds ok to me.
#41

jon_oracle_of_athas

Apr 23, 2006 7:25:13
You are endowed with a higher secular authority than your rank would normally permit.

The term rank could be confusing. If you have higher secular authority, you have higher rank.

"You are endowed with higher secular authority." is sufficient, compared to the Practiced Spellcaster feat description. If we want to improve on the Practiced Spellcaster description, we could add "You are endowed with higher secular authority, despite your focus outside the templarate."
#42

bengeldorn

Apr 23, 2006 12:26:58
You are endowed with higher secular authority, despite your focus outside the templarate.

Sounds even better.
#43

Pennarin

Apr 23, 2006 15:04:38
That's nice Jon, I vote for it Bengeldorn.