Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1zombiegleemaxJun 26, 2006 13:40:31 | Just noticed in the Monster Manual IV table of contents, they have the Macahuitl listed under new weapons. That's all ![]() |
#2eric_anondsonJun 26, 2006 17:57:52 | A macahuitl is an aztec weapon. Not special to Athas at all. A macahuitl is a paddle of wood ringed with obsidian shards along the edge. |
#3zombiegleemaxJun 27, 2006 7:11:25 | Were stats given for the maquahuitl in some official Dark Sun/AD&D supplement? I created my own after a bit of background reading. Eric Anondson's right in saying it was a meso-American weapon, but given that it relies on no metal components I'd say it's pretty well suited to Athas. Personally I used it as a specialist Tyrian weapon in my campaign, since Tyr has the 'Aztec' style. |
#4flipJun 27, 2006 8:34:10 | Were stats given for the maquahuitl in some official Dark Sun/AD&D supplement? DS3. I created my own after a bit of background reading. Eric Anondson's right in saying it was a meso-American weapon, but given that it relies on no metal components I'd say it's pretty well suited to Athas. Personally I used it as a specialist Tyrian weapon in my campaign, since Tyr has the 'Aztec' style. ... er ... you mean Draj? |
#5zombiegleemaxJun 27, 2006 13:12:28 | ... er ... you mean Draj? ... er ... yes! |
#6eric_anondsonJun 27, 2006 15:18:21 | Were stats given for the maquahuitl in some official Dark Sun/AD&D supplement? In AD&D, generally it was assumed to be the stats of an "obsidian longsword". |
#7thebraxJul 09, 2006 19:03:18 | Since at least one of the artists had taken "obsidian longsword" literally and drew a weapon that anyone could tell woudl shatter on first impact, some of the 3e designers argued successfully that it was time we called a macahuitl a macahuitl. |