Why was the Dark Sun campaign done away with?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

todesherr

Oct 02, 2006 9:03:40
and is there any chance of reviving it with 3.5 rules? It was an awesome world...one which is sorely missed...
#2

fabius_maximus

Oct 02, 2006 9:07:39
You're right, it's an fantastic setting. Only that it sold not well enough, I guess.
#3

ordbyrht

Oct 02, 2006 9:09:09
Please see Wizards' Dark Sun Forum and The Burnt World of Athas.
#4

funes_the_memorious

Oct 02, 2006 10:10:15
Why was the Dark Sun campaign done away with?

It did't sell, and WOTC/Hasbro likes profit$.

As for a 3.5 update, there was one in Dragon , Issue 319. No back issues, but you can get the PDF.

http://paizo.com/store/paizo/dragon/downloads/319
#5

deekin

Oct 02, 2006 10:35:26
That, and as CPsi showed, wizards hates psionics and want them to go away.
#6

imban

Oct 02, 2006 12:13:54
Actually printing Complete Psionic, even though a lot of it was bad, seems to insist to me that they don't want psionics to go away and die. That seems to be more the wishful thinking of some players. :P
#7

Jhaelen

Oct 02, 2006 13:22:31
You're right, it's an fantastic setting. Only that it sold not well enough, I guess.

I'm not even sure about that. I'd say it's just that they decided to stick with one setting. All campaign settings besides FR (which for some reason I cannot even begin to fathom seems to sell best) were discontinued. Planescape, e.g. was great, as well.
#8

protonik_dup

Oct 02, 2006 19:27:21
Dark Sun was canned BEFORE WOTC bought TSR. Sales were in the toilet after a nice bump with the revised box, it just petered out. The only settings that really turned a profit were FR and Ravenloft. Planescape remained on the fringe which is why so much cool stuff was being done with it.
#9

mhacdebhandia

Oct 02, 2006 19:31:26
It did't sell, and WOTC/Hasbro likes profit$.

As for a 3.5 update, there was one in Dragon , Issue 319. No back issues, but you can get the PDF.

http://paizo.com/store/paizo/dragon/downloads/319

It's worth pointing out that Dark Sun purists might find the aim of that conversion - to adapt the setting to the revised Third Edition rules, rather than use the current ruleset to describe the setting as it used to be - a little jarring. Paladins are included, for instance.

There's a companion article in the same month's Dungeon Magazine.
#10

zombiegleemax

Oct 02, 2006 19:52:52
They are making Expedition books for some of the old campaign settings. Perhaps Dark sun will be one...
#11

pukunui

Oct 02, 2006 20:02:58
Don't forget the third edition conversion at www.athas.org. It's supposedly a separate conversion from the one at Paizo, so the two are incompatible but both are "semi-official" in the eyes of WotC, or so I am told.

I really enjoyed the Dark Sun world, although most of my experience with it was through the old impossible-to-win "Dark Sun: Shattered Lands" PC game. (I did have the 2e campaign setting box set and the Complete Gladiator's Handbook but I never got an opportunity to run a game in the setting).
#12

sumowrestler

Oct 02, 2006 20:07:27
I'm not even sure about that. I'd say it's just that they decided to stick with one setting. All campaign settings besides FR (which for some reason I cannot even begin to fathom seems to sell best) were discontinued. Planescape, e.g. was great, as well.


I would disagree that all of the settings were eliminated. We do have a Dragonlance campaign setting. The reason for FR being out is that it is the most complete world that they have. That may also be the main reason it sold so well.
#13

andreww

Oct 02, 2006 22:48:32
I would disagree that all of the settings were eliminated. We do have a Dragonlance campaign setting. The reason for FR being out is that it is the most complete world that they have. That may also be the main reason it sold so well.

Also there are all the novels for Forgotten Realms which helps it aong.
#14

stormonu

Oct 02, 2006 23:05:31
Athas had novels too (The Prism Pentad), but I don't think more novels could have kept it alive; the world was a bit too faddish - it was popular because it was different, but people quickly lost interest once the novelty wore off. I like Dark Sun, but I think the main reason it hasn't been revived is two-fold: 1st) It's strange. It isn't your standard D&D middle-ages setting 2) It doesn't have a champion like Hickman & Weis.

I think WotC could probably draw a profit if they made a 3E small-print run of Dark Sun, making it well known that beyond the campaign book there would be no support. I think if they did the like for other campaign worlds, they could turn a tidy little sum and make a lot of people of happy - at least for a short while.
#15

the_ubbergeek

Oct 02, 2006 23:07:48
Tsr, Wizards of the Coast, all that, they are corporations; like it or not, it's not an hobby, or more exactly it's also a business. They have to make money. It's the way of the world, fans... No hate there, as far I know.
#16

Mouseferatu

Oct 02, 2006 23:32:32
I really enjoyed the Dark Sun world, although most of my experience with it was through the old impossible-to-win "Dark Sun: Shattered Lands" PC game. (I did have the 2e campaign setting box set and the Complete Gladiator's Handbook but I never got an opportunity to run a game in the setting).

Huh. Not to sidetrack the thread, but I didn't find that game "impossible to win." In fact, it's on the (very short) list of computer games that I ever have played to completion.

It was a blast, though. It, the old Al Qadim game, and the first Ravenloft game all still rank among my favorite PC gaming memories.
#17

todesherr

Oct 03, 2006 0:49:30
There are clear reasons why Forgotten Realms is such a hit...it is a great setting, many, diverse deities to choose from, many different organisations, a huge tract of land steeped in ancient myth and history, arguably the most well developed and interesting NPCs in D&D's history. The list goes on and on...I am not saying that Dark Sun should have been shelved....by no means...it was a great setting and its uniqueness was unrivaled...Planescape is an even sadder tale as it was next to FR my all time favourite setting...boy it kicked arse....I miss it...
#18

timespike

Oct 03, 2006 9:07:13
I wouldn't give up hope on either of them just yet. I'm sure WotC is fully aware of what they're sitting on, and is just trying to figure out a way to make it profitable. (And one thing that some of the people who hate "money grubbing" corporations have to understand is this: US corporations don't just persue profits because they want to, they do it because under US law, they have to. They have a legal obligation to their shareholders.)

With the Ravenloft adventure releasing this month, it's becoming apparent that WotC is beginning to see the old settings as profitable again. And I have a feeling that as long as they make the Dark Sun books crunchy enough, probably even non-Dark Sun-playing GMs and players will buy them; some good psionic classes here, a few nifty special materials there, some good monsters on the side and boom, you've got sales.
#19

cnahumck

Oct 03, 2006 19:00:36
Dark sun is much better the way it is now: FREE. And it is fantastic.
#20

kalthandrix

Oct 03, 2006 22:33:07
After seeing the material that came out in the Dragon and Dungeon mags (not specifically Jon and flips material - they worked with what they had) but I am glad that Wizards has decided to basically sit on their hands with this setting - trying to fit DS into the "core world" concept is criminal and it would be like...well...I do not have a good example on hand, but it would be plain wrong because I said so :P (my argument skilz and reasoning ability has deserted me to go to sleep and I think I will follow them!!!)
#21

eric_anondson

Oct 03, 2006 22:50:18
Dark Sun was mostly done away with because TSR went bankrupt. It wasn't revived because those who bought TSR (WotC) came up with a different business plan that didn't involve scores of settings that fractured the customer base, picking the most popular to maintain.
#22

woobyluv

Oct 04, 2006 2:22:42
Really all WotC has to do to endorse a campaign setting is publish the Main Campaign book and let the other companies out there develop materials on their own, with WotC signing off on the projects. This way, WotC can jump in if they suddenly become profitable or let them die should sales not meet expectations. However, I prefer to have those Dark Sun purists, such as www.athas.org continue to develop materials for the new edition of the game. IMHO only those that truly understand the setting and care for its continued prosperity should have a hand in making a future for the setting.

But that may just be me
#23

redkank_dup

Oct 04, 2006 3:40:27
Yah, totally. WotC would just screw it up with cross-marketing garbage. The Burnt World of Athas guys seem to know their stuff. Let them keep developing it, I say.
#24

flip

Oct 04, 2006 9:45:24
Really all WotC has to do to endorse a campaign setting is publish the Main Campaign book and let the other companies out there develop materials on their own, with WotC signing off on the projects. This way, WotC can jump in if they suddenly become profitable or let them die should sales not meet expectations.

They actually tried this business model in the past -- couple of years ago. Not with Dark Sun, but with one of the other old campaign settings, though I can't recall which one. Basically, none of the third party publishers would bite. Core setting books sell by one or two orders of magnitude better than the followon supplementals.

As for why DS was canceled, way back in '95? TSR was a mess, and steadily circiling the drain. They were in financial trouble, and DS -- and several other niche settings -- just weren't making them any money. They felt they had to discontinue the non-profitables. It costs them quite a bit of money to do a print run, pay authors, copy editors, etc ... Making a new product is an investment, and if it doesn't sell well, then they loose money on it. TSR was busy doing that hand over fist.

Of the "dead" campaign settings -- Weise and Hickman have reclaimed Dragonlance, and WotC published a corebook in '03. ArtHaus/White Wolf/Sword and Sorcery picked up Ravenloft in '02 or '03, but it's now out of print.

Near as I know, Birthright, Planescape, Spelljammer and Mystara still primarily exist through the fan sites, much as Athas.org does. that is, there's been some minor treatment in Dragon, but otherwise it's up to the site.

http://www.amazon.com/Dragonlance-Campaign-Dungeon-Dragons-Roleplaying/dp/0786930861
http://www.white-wolf.com/ravenloft/

As for WotC making use of the DS property? There have been rumors over the years, everywhere from Troy Denning getting the property back, to an animated cartoon. Nothing has ever come of it.
#25

redkank_dup

Oct 04, 2006 10:19:55
Of the "dead" campaign settings -- Weise and Hickman have reclaimed Dragonlance, and WotC published a corebook in '03. ArtHaus/White Wolf/Sword and Sorcery picked up Ravenloft in '02 or '03, but it's now out of print.

Yah, and not just out of print, but the rights to Ravenloft reverted back to WotC. Oh, and look what we have from them this month: Expedition to Castle Ravenloft. WotC know what side their bread is buttered on, and no mistake. Dragonlance seems to be doing a roaring trade, though. They have a thriving product line, fans post at the WotC DL boards less and less, choosing the official DL forums instead. They're doing pretty well. DS might be so lucky if it could get the original designers back into the mix, but they have pretty much moved on afaik. Athas is in good hands right now, seems to me.
#26

delerak

Oct 04, 2006 15:35:23
It's too bad. I have a lot of the old DS material and campaign stuff.

Wanderers Journal forever!
#27

nicomacheus

Oct 04, 2006 16:03:32
If you want to spend a lot of money on a campaign world try Eberron.

If you want to start a Dark Sun campaign Athas.org is a fantastic website. There is more than enough material there to get things moving.

If you're going to play anything short of a home-brewed campaign, put in a little effort reading some novels and a couple of supplements. It will enhance your experience of any game world whether player or DM.
#28

zombiegleemax

Oct 04, 2006 23:42:20
You DS people don't know how lucky you are.
As an SJ fan, we have a 3.x conversion process that moves... well reasonably slowly (ok so it's our fault... meh). I haven't looked over athas.org for a while, but from what i remember, it was an Amazing site!

I'd been wondering lately whether there was more than met teh eye about Ravenloft reverting to WotC ... looks like maybe i was right...
#29

lastard

Oct 05, 2006 6:21:25
I have to say they've got a cool logo. It looks good on the stuff they've got in their merchandise section. That's the fashion designer speaking...

Has there ever been any DS merchandise? Just curious how that looked like. Just thinking to do a spoof DS collection. But then I've almost started doing that when I was at fashion college...

IMAGE(http://www.geocities.com/lastard/warrior.JPG)IMAGE(http://www.geocities.com/lastard/priest.JPG)

(1999)

... although I somehow don't think that people would wear this kind of stuff for a stroll through their local town centre... maybe I should do a wearable collection after all ;)

Lastard >8)
#30

redkank_dup

Oct 05, 2006 6:39:10
I have to say they've got a cool logo. It looks good on the stuff they've got in their merchandise section. That's the fashion designer speaking...

Has there ever been any DS merchandise? Just curious how that looked like. Just thinking to do a spoof DS collection. But then I've almost started doing that when I was at fashion college...

IMAGE(http://www.geocities.com/lastard/warrior.JPG)IMAGE(http://www.geocities.com/lastard/priest.JPG)

(1999)

... although I somehow don't think that people would wear this kind of stuff for a stroll through their local town centre... maybe I should do a wearable collection after all ;)

Lastard >8)

Lastard, those are awesome pictures. Do you have more of that kind of DS-themed clothing to view? I use handouts and images in my games all the time, and that would work really well as something to show players.
#31

lastard

Oct 05, 2006 7:08:50
unfortunately not. i drew some kind of millinery based collection (our theatre costume tutor left and i ended up in the the millinery elective, but the stuff was still pretty theatre-design influenced) and stuck everything onto huge boards with are now somewhere in my parents attic. these are the only two hats i've got pictures of. after 5 years of doing fashion (i've been told i'm an anomaly in the rpg world) i now study human geography so i just occasionally make clothes, costumes, mutant toy animals or drawings for fun! i occasionally post those on my website in various sections...

lastard >8)
#32

jon_oracle_of_athas

Oct 06, 2006 14:26:54
Maybe we could use those for illustrations in DS projects or articles, Lastard?
#33

lastard

Oct 06, 2006 14:54:26
Yes, you can if you think they work with the Dark Sun styling (the fashion person speaking again, haha) ! I currently have some illustrations in the gallery section

http://www.geocities.com/lastard/gallery.htm

and some other drawings in other sections (Monsters, Artefacts, NPCs and People & Places). Hopefully after my exams this month I will be able to do some more drawings... Anything specific you are looking for?

Lastard >8)
#34

lastard

Oct 08, 2006 14:46:21
ARgh! Just noticed my first comment was supposed to be for a different thread!! The Intellectual Property one... it does not make any sense here! Maybe it ended up here coz when I posted it there was some maintenance action and some downtime occurred! Sorry, folks!!

Lastard >8)
#35

Pennarin

Oct 08, 2006 22:15:58
What's the point of this thread? WizOs bump it to this board...so that, what...we speculate on what we already know? That thread belongs on the general boards, not here.

And btw, what's also the point of answering the people who first wrote in this thread if they can't find it again to look up the answers?

/frustrated about other things, just venting out
#36

Zardnaar

Oct 08, 2006 23:13:18
lLack of sales. DS was always a niche product. Psionics didn't help it either. To be blunt 2nd ed was a mish mash disaster. DS the world was great. DS the game was awful mechanics wise.
#37

zombiegleemax

Oct 09, 2006 2:19:25
lLack of sales. DS was always a niche product. Psionics didn't help it either. To be blunt 2nd ed was a mish mash disaster. DS the world was great. DS the game was awful mechanics wise.

Mechanics-wise, 2nd ed was awful in general...

Although I still like running Dark Sun in 2nd ed. For some reason, it's the easiest setting for me to run in 2nd ed.

What's the point of this thread? WizOs bump it to this board...so that, what...we speculate on what we already know? That thread belongs on the general boards, not here.

And btw, what's also the point of answering the people who first wrote in this thread if they can't find it again to look up the answers?

/frustrated about other things, just venting out

And thus does Dark Sun stay in obscurity. (Sigh) At least the old fans still stick around.
#38

Zardnaar

Oct 09, 2006 2:26:01
Yeah the mechanics in 2nd ed were awful. DS had its on share of contradictions, rules loopholes and general bleah factor that could have been left out of it IMHO.
#39

dzauku

Oct 15, 2006 13:23:19
Well If I remember correctly in the 30 years of DnD book ( or however long it has been ) they say that Dark SUn was one of the best selling campaign settings they ever produced. The real reason that DS went under was the " revised and Expanded " version, my apologie sto the authors and those who loved this expansion but it just did not jive one single bit with the setting as it had been up to that point. TSR's lack of support for the setting did not help either. More books based in the world would have pushed sales.

The Mechanics were a mess but then again most people I ever played with just used house rules anyway so I do not see that being much of the cuase for the setting's demise. though truly had they left out Psionics all together i think the setting would have been just fine, if not better off.


If we really want WotC to revisist Athas then we need to drum up interest in the setting OUTSIDE of the established fan base. A few really good short stories and articles in Dragon and Dungeon would go a long way to help this, but starting here in the forums would help out a lot too.

But alas I do not think that WotC is going to be even considering supporting another setting until Eberron has run it's course or Forgotten realms dies all together. :evillaugh
#40

eric_anondson

Oct 15, 2006 21:15:38
The real reason that DS went under was the " revised and Expanded " version, my apologie sto the authors and those who loved this expansion but it just did not jive one single bit with the setting as it had been up to that point.

It is far from the real reason why the setting went was done away with.
#41

zombiegleemax

Oct 15, 2006 22:13:02
It is far from the real reason why the setting went was done away with.

What was the real reason?

-J
#42

redkank_dup

Oct 16, 2006 4:51:27
The real reason? Space halflings. And ninjas. But mostly space halflings.
#43

zombiegleemax

Oct 16, 2006 9:23:04
The real reason? Space halflings. And ninjas. But mostly space halflings.

I hate Ninjas. Those guys are everywhere.

-J
#44

Sysane

Oct 16, 2006 9:38:01
I'm sure that the dolphins had their evil little fins in it as well.
#45

kalthandrix

Oct 16, 2006 11:16:27
I hate Ninjas. Those guys are everywhere.

-J

Ninja's are cool - and it says why here -

http://www.realultimatepower.net/index4.htm

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g28/Kalthandrix/poster-ninja.jpg

I'm sure that the dolphins had their evil little fins in it as well.

For those of you who do not believe - phear!

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g28/Kalthandrix/motivator72eefc0fd54206e063df0c4441.jpg
#46

jon_oracle_of_athas

Oct 16, 2006 12:35:36
When are the designers of Terrors of Athas going to wake up and change the alignment of the dolphin to Lawful Evil. It was obviously a 2E error that they were Lawful Good. ;)
#47

Oninotaki

Oct 17, 2006 6:46:48
1st of all every campaign setting was done away with aside from forgotten realms, and greyhawk(which only got a tiny bit of token refrences in the PHB and other supplments).

2nd I firmly believe that the reason we havent seen Darksun liscended out is because it was such a big seller back in the day. I know that dragonlance was also a big seller but come on, Darksun had its only MMO for christ sake. Not only that but the original Dragonlance authors are the one who wanted to liscence it out and their fans would follow them anywhere and listen to anything they say. So if they didnt get the liscence all they would have to say is WOTC is evil and wont give us our Dragonlance world, please dont buy anymore DL product and that would be the end of all DL product. On top of that the one other Campaign setting that they did liscence out was a total flop(Ravenloft)

Sorry about all the grammer and spelling errors its like the butt crack of dawn here lol

To sum it up I dont think it was malicous, and it obviously didnt happen to just Darksun. Darksun is just to prophitable(stupid hooked on Phonics) to be given away, and its not the time for WOTC to release old settings yet.
#48

dracochapel

Oct 17, 2006 7:17:31
Id be surprised if DS was a big seller.
I think unlike FR it was a fairly complete game world with only a minimal number of supplements required to play. and the novels didnt help by alienating/confusing so many of the fans.
Gimme the 2nd edition boxed set, complete gladiators, defilers and preservers and the will and the way and i had all i needed.
The revised version tried to fix this, by establishing the mythos and expanding the game world, but unsuccessfully.
FR is the marvel universe, a lot of heroes, a massive number of plotlines, and more stories than you can throw a stick at (or you could call it the WWE if you want).
Dark Sun limited itself in scope, then threw in this history that didnt match, and killed off half the major NPC's. Dont get me wrong. i love the setting, and i liked the novels (whyd Rajaat kill Tec! he kicked ass!) but to dream of some day when DS will return like a phoenix?
Be grateful for athas.org. Cause i bet thats all we'll ever get of the world under the Dark Sun.
#49

brun01

Oct 17, 2006 12:39:45
I think the problem really was that DS sold poorly compared to other settings, and I don't think it has anything to do with rules, mechanics, or the setting.
DS is way too different from the average d&d world. This means it is really hard to explain it to newcomers and to adapt supplements to it. There isn't a single 3.5 product that can be used "as is" with DS, but you can use 99% of them with FR and Eberron. This is the main reason.

Also, space hamsters and dwelfs. :P
#50

jon_oracle_of_athas

Oct 18, 2006 13:26:52
A lot of speculation in this thread. I would be more interested in facts. :P
#51

brun01

Oct 18, 2006 13:30:19
An oracle interested in facts? That makes no sense! ;)
#52

kalthandrix

Oct 18, 2006 14:35:16
A lot of speculation in this thread. I would be more interested in facts. :P

I agree - there is enough reaching here to stretch out a runty halfling (not that a good stretching would not do some of those buggers some good) but unsupported "facts" seem to be running a bit rampant!!!
#53

kalthandrix

Oct 18, 2006 15:12:24
Here is some fact and speculation!

http://www.atlasofadventure.com/Archive/TSR1997Buyout.asp

http://www.highprogrammer.com/alan/rants/tsr.html
#54

kalthandrix

Oct 19, 2006 11:42:58
I think I killed this thread!!! :evillaugh
#55

cnahumck

Oct 19, 2006 13:16:08
no, just a sobering experience reading that. though you'd think that they would pay more attention to the complaints of the psionic forums, lots of good ideas and suggestions, and they seem to be ignored.

regardless. Athas is in good hands now.

let's keep it free.
#56

Oninotaki

Oct 20, 2006 0:44:48
no, just a sobering experience reading that. though you'd think that they would pay more attention to the complaints of the psionic forums, lots of good ideas and suggestions, and they seem to be ignored.

regardless. Athas is in good hands now.

let's keep it free.

I think that would be the best way to fulfill the dreams of all of athasians, lets keep them free
#57

zombiegleemax

Oct 20, 2006 13:19:25
Those were great links. So now that TSR is basically gone a WotC is running the show, Dark Sun is in a completely different place, liscensing-wise. I hope it stays free too. But COULD it be for sale?
#58

jon_oracle_of_athas

Oct 20, 2006 13:45:28
I donĀ“t think anyone currently at WotC with veto rights has high personal stakes in DS, so basically if anyone makes a good enough offer, the license should be theirs, commercially speaking. Any billionaire DS fans out there?
#59

zombiegleemax

Oct 20, 2006 17:27:51
What's the price? in euros, please.:D
#60

jon_oracle_of_athas

Oct 21, 2006 6:16:05
You would would have to ask WotC that question. How much you got to spend?
#61

zombiegleemax

Oct 26, 2006 8:50:48
3,000 cp and 10% of the sales :d