Drow of the Underdark

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

bastrak

Feb 20, 2007 14:32:30
The promo cover I have seen for Drow of the Underdark has an "Erelhei-Cinlu revisited" caption next to it.

So there certainly seems to be an update for everyone's favorite City and the chances of other Greyhawk content is looking good. Hopefully the Drow will be based more on EGG's original and less on the FR variant.

Let the speculation begin :D
#2

orodruin

Feb 20, 2007 19:32:39
It's the first time I've heard of it. Looks interesting.

To be honest I was already expecting Erelhei-Cinlu to get some coverage in "Expedition to the Demonweb Pits." If it gets even more exposure in "Drow of the Underdark" it'll be great!

(yep, I've got that GDQ nostalgia thing going.)
#3

ripvanwormer

Feb 20, 2007 20:18:45
From what the author has said, there won't be any substantial information on Erelhei-Cinlu in Expedition, although it is mentioned in an off-hand way. I don't think any part of that adventure takes place on the Material Plane.

Hopefully, the Drow of the Underdark stuff will be based on Fred Weining's material in Dragon Magazine, which I thought was really well done.
#4

zombiegleemax

Mar 13, 2007 17:34:22
The article that was done on the Drow was a great one. It shows how horrendous they really are and how unlikley a "good drow" would be in the their society. I hope that they outline some of the Noble houses and also give some great Prcs!

I just finished pre-ordering it from Amazon, two months to wait!
#5

paladin2019

Mar 13, 2007 20:45:02
D'ri'z'zt? Doesn't that mean, "damned kid I shoulda sacrificed when he was three and he offered his toy to his sister and I detect good on him and I was right and dammit I didn't kill him then I guess I deserve whatever demeaning death Lolth sends my way 'cause I'm such a weak-willed or ignorant so and so"?
#6

zombiegleemax

Mar 14, 2007 11:34:28
I cant stand him either!
#7

Mortepierre

Mar 14, 2007 11:43:42
Eh, don't accuse the hero or the author. The concept of ONE lone good drow was an intriguing one. His first novels were a pleasure to read too.

I suspect that what people dislike about him is what the weak-minded fans have made of him. Suddenly, it was uberkewl to play a two-weapons-wielding drow of G alignment who spent his days crying over his fate. You couldn't play in a MMORPG without tripping over score of Drizzit, Drist, and so forth.

Then again, Luke Skywalker and various other "heroes" have experienced the same problem. It's the fans who are to blame because they have so little imagination that they have to play copycat (and bad copycat at that).

I mean, I love dwarves but I don't go around playing one named Grimli, Gumli, or something similar...
#8

zombiegleemax

Mar 14, 2007 19:32:24
You cant get on WOW and not run into a Drizzt or a Dalamar or even a Raistlin. I once ran into a Raistlina, it was so skeef dumb.
#9

ripvanwormer

Mar 14, 2007 20:46:12
There are lots of female Raistlins out there.
#10

paladin2019

Mar 15, 2007 0:33:34
Two reasons I don't like Drizzt. The first is how unlikely he is in a society that would sacrifice him at the first sign of being not evil (and they can tell:evillaugh) This one isn't bad, it can work with a good author, but I have major suspension of disbelief issues here.

The second is the greater evil, I think. Drizzt was created under the AD&D ruleset. In that, Drow could two weapons without penalty. This ability replaced the normal elven +1 to hit with longswords, short bows and the various non-crossbows. So Drizzt's use of two weapons was fully supported by the rules, no funky exceptions were needed to support this (he had others, this just wasn't one of them.) Then AD&D2E came, along with a backlash against Drow AFAIK. It could just be a pre-LA attempt at balance. Regardless, ALL elves had exactly the same abilities, even if they made no sense. Drow and aquatic elves have bonuses with longswords and bows, even though they aren't traditional weapons, etc. So our hero, the savior of the brand, could not use his signature technique, at least not without a -2 to hit on his off-hand. Well that just won't do. Let's make his signature technique a function of his class, not race. So now rangers can fight with two weapons. Nevermind that THE iconic ranger, the one who gives the class it's name but his own cannot be spoken, as well as the iconics mentioned in the class description, are never mentioned fighting with two weapons. Okay, THE iconic did, once, with two TORCHES to ward away the nasty evil things rather than damage them. Because they feared fire and stuff.

So i don't like Drizzt because I hold the character as the reason changes were made to the ranger, changes I didn't like. What, I don't do +12 damage to giant class monsters anymore? But I can hit one specific monster on that list at +4 to hit and I can use two weapons if I give up my magic banded mail. And i lose my surprise benefits if I don't lose my armor, too? WTF![/rant]
#11

paladin2019

Mar 15, 2007 0:36:11
Sorry about that. I am excited about this, too. And if I may, an intriguing read on the Drow of Erelhei Cinlu's attitudes on the nature of Drow-hood.
#12

zombiegleemax

Mar 17, 2007 13:58:03
I love that city, even if I do not know how to spell it! :P I hope that in the Demon Web module that is going to come out next month there will be a chance to stop by there, even if Lolth was not the major deity there in 1st edition.:P
#13

vormaerin

Mar 17, 2007 15:26:47
Umm, yes she was. The whole storyline of the GDQ series was an attempt by two of the houses, led by Eclavdra Eilservs, to get out from under the dominion of the Great Fane's Lolthian priestesses by turning to the Elder Elemental God and garner wealth/allies from the surface.

The original Greyhawk material said that the drow worshipped various demonlords, of whom Lolth was far and away the most influential. Graz'zt features in some material as having drow followers. No doubt there are others.
#14

zombiegleemax

Mar 17, 2007 15:28:14
In the Epic Handbook IIRC it states that she turns from the Elder Elemental God and becomes a cleric of Lolth.
#15

samwise

Mar 17, 2007 19:12:04
The original Greyhawk material said that the drow worshipped various demonlords, of whom Lolth was far and away the most influential. Graz'zt features in some material as having drow followers. No doubt there are others.

No, it says Lolth was just the best known, specifically because of the events of the GDQ series. It didn't assign any supremacy to Lolth outside of the Vault.
#16

zombiegleemax

Mar 19, 2007 11:12:09
But you have to remember that she was only a demon queen back then and not a full fledged goddess.
#17

vormaerin

Mar 19, 2007 15:14:04
Well, yes and no. All the demonlords were the equivalent of gods back then. Leastwise, the really big name ones. That's why you find Lolth and Yeenoghu in the Dieties and Demigods book. But, yeah, in the FR she became a goddess who lived in the Abyss (not even in the Abyss now) rather than a demoness with a large cult. Of course, that's just one change. Another is that you won't see any "Lareth the Beautiful" types in the FR. Human male clerics of Lolth? Not quite...
#18

zombiegleemax

Mar 19, 2007 16:15:48
No Lareth the Beautiful, but "good drow" and a goddess of "good" drow!
#19

vormaerin

Mar 19, 2007 22:26:54
Not to rain on anyone's anti Drizzt parade, but there was a good drow in Vault of the Drow. Nilonim. He was NG or maybe TN(G), one or the other. Of course, he was a prisoner after his rebellion against the noble houses failed. But still....
#20

zombiegleemax

Mar 19, 2007 22:33:56
So he got what was coming to him?
#21

vormaerin

Mar 19, 2007 22:35:11
Nah, cuz its likely the PCs rescue him unless they are the sort that just kill the bad guys' prisoners out of hand.
#22

zombiegleemax

Mar 20, 2007 9:33:01
I will have to look at my copy again for that.
#23

Monteblanco

Mar 21, 2007 9:31:13
[...]So i don't like Drizzt because I hold the character as the reason changes were made to the ranger, changes I didn't like. What, I don't do +12 damage to giant class monsters anymore? But I can hit one specific monster on that list at +4 to hit and I can use two weapons if I give up my magic banded mail. And i lose my surprise benefits if I don't lose my armor, too? WTF![/rant]

According to Monte Cook at the ENWorld message boards, when Salvatore created the ranger, he consulted with Zeb Cook at TSR who was writing the 2nd edition AD&D at the time. Zeb Cook decided to give the ranger the two-weapon fighting ability by himself. Salvatore just liked and incorporated it to his character.

I used to blame Drizzt for this one too but don't worry, the fact that the books are poorly written is a far more compelling reason.
#24

zombiegleemax

Mar 21, 2007 10:11:31
:heehee
#25

paladin2019

Mar 24, 2007 13:48:44
According to Monte Cook at the ENWorld message boards, when Salvatore created the ranger, he consulted with Zeb Cook at TSR who was writing the 2nd edition AD&D at the time. Zeb Cook decided to give the ranger the two-weapon fighting ability by himself. Salvatore just liked and incorporated it to his character.

I used to blame Drizzt for this one too but don't worry, the fact that the books are poorly written is a far more compelling reason.

Drizzt was a AD&D character. Acording to Hall of Heroes (a pre AD&D2E product) he is a 10th level Drow ranger. Drow, in AD&D, may fight with two weapons without penalty but have no to hit bonuses with swords or bows. Thus, with AD&D2E's attempt to equalize all elves, the ability had to move from a racial to a class ability to maintain Drizzt's legality. I blame Drizzt. EDIT: and his alter-ego:D
#26

elberethsilverleaf

Mar 26, 2007 20:33:25
Then again, Luke Skywalker and various other "heroes" have experienced the same problem. It's the fans who are to blame because they have so little imagination that they have to play copycat (and bad copycat at that).

You want to see REALLY bad copycats, just go to any Trek convention and look at all of the outta shape pot-bellied klingons running around. lol
#27

zombiegleemax

Mar 28, 2007 6:25:22
IIRC in 3.0 or 3.5 Drizzt is like an epic laevel character with levels in everything.
#28

ripvanwormer

Mar 28, 2007 21:45:26
He's a Fighter 10/Barbarian 1/Ranger 5.
#29

zombiegleemax

Mar 28, 2007 22:35:34
ECL 18 still?
#30

yakman

Mar 29, 2007 15:38:00
Drizzt was a fascinating character in the beginning. That's why he went from being one of four characters in the Icewind Dale trilogy to becoming the largest seller of D&D books of all time.

However, I think the quality of the books has diminished significantly since the Dark Elf trilogy, although Starless Night was excellent.
#31

zombiegleemax

Mar 29, 2007 22:49:45
He who taketh down and entire house by himselk? AAH PHOOEY
1
#32

zombiegleemax

Apr 05, 2007 7:24:12
In about two weeks the Demonweb Pits will be re-explored and in about a month the DROW shall again raid the surface realms.
#33

mikayla_dup

Apr 05, 2007 19:26:25
Its nice to see the new books coming out - but I have to admit some trepidation. Every time WotC releases a game book or novel about the drow I fear for Lolth. Yes, Lolth. As a girl I think the only reason I stuck with D&D in the early days (read, late 70s) was because at least girl drow kicked butt! Since then, well, I've been a drow fan girl (as a previous poster, Vorm, can testify too). So, as long as Lolth lives and Her priestesses go on distributing her special brand of grrl-powered spidery evilness, all will be right in the world. And below it.

;)
#34

zombiegleemax

Apr 06, 2007 11:27:02
Long live the Spider Queen!!
#35

zombiegleemax

Apr 12, 2007 20:55:24
A preview is up!!
#36

bastrak

Apr 13, 2007 14:35:25
From the April preview there is a whole chapter about Erelhei-Cinlu :D

I'll certainly be getting this as soon as it appears.
#37

zombiegleemax

Apr 13, 2007 20:35:48
Mine is already on order.
#38

xammer99

Apr 17, 2007 15:19:36
Where can you find a preview? I looked on wizards and must be missin it.

Thanks!
#39

zombiegleemax

Apr 17, 2007 22:43:01
The preview is now on.
#40

protonik_dup

Apr 27, 2007 17:42:08
The promo cover I have seen for Drow of the Underdark has an "Erelhei-Cinlu revisited" caption next to it.

So there certainly seems to be an update for everyone's favorite City and the chances of other Greyhawk content is looking good. Hopefully the Drow will be based more on EGG's original and less on the FR variant.

Let the speculation begin :D

If I may ask, I haven't noticed yet, but how are the two different?
#41

protonik_dup

Apr 27, 2007 17:57:49
Let's make his signature technique a function of his class, not race. So now rangers can fight with two weapons.
So i don't like Drizzt because I hold the character as the reason changes were made to the ranger, changes I didn't like. [/rant]

Sooooooooooooooo not true. When Dave Cook was designing 2e he was debating on the change in rangers to make them more interesting to play and Salvatore liked it and had Driz'zt use that feature in the books. Driz'zt was never a PC and wasn't written with the game rules in mind but with the interest of telling a story. I believe that story was told in Dragon magazine but it may have been the FR list but it was an article or post dealing with the changes to ranger in 2e and that Driz'zt was the reason. No, he wasn't. But a lot of the rules changes later were designed so that players could pull off things like Driz'zt would do and other characters as well like Cadderly, the chic from Azure Bonds etc. So it isn't like he is the only one that they made changes to allow for and it actually HELPED to open up AD&D to allow for many more concepts and ideas and not make the game so rigid or punish you for wanting to pull off interesting things.
#42

ripvanwormer

Apr 27, 2007 21:32:11
If I may ask, I haven't noticed yet, but how are the two different?

Originally, drow were said to worship demon lords. Lolth was one of them, but not by any means the only one they worshipped. So instead of pantheon of gods, they were originally supposed to worship the Lords of the Abyss. Some of them also worshipped the Elder Elemental God.

Lolth as the primary goddess of the drow is pretty well established now, in the Monster Manual and elsewhere, so I don't see that changing. I'd like to see some drow worshippers of Orcus, Baphomet, Graz'zt, Malcanthet and others, though, just for variety.
#43

protonik_dup

Apr 27, 2007 22:04:55
Originally, drow were said to worship demon lords. Lolth was one of them, but not by any means the only one they worshipped. So instead of pantheon of gods, they were originally supposed to worship the Lords of the Abyss. Some of them also worshipped the Elder Elemental God.

Lolth as the primary goddess of the drow is pretty well established now, in the Monster Manual and elsewhere, so I don't see that changing. I'd like to see some drow worshippers of Orcus, Baphomet, Graz'zt, Malcanthet and others, though, just for variety.

Ah, thanks for the information. I have a large 1e collection but the drow stuff has always alluded me. This makes them much cooler and more interesting if you ask me. I hope the new book covers that stuff as well!