Announcement

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

zombiegleemax

Apr 23, 2007 20:25:51
Everyone get onto the Dragonlance.com webpage for an important Dragonlance announcement.
#2

valharic

Apr 23, 2007 21:14:29
Here's the link...

MWP Announcement
#3

theyeti1775

Apr 23, 2007 21:28:06
http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=834968

Here's the thread on the main board.
#4

zombiegleemax

Apr 23, 2007 23:52:54
This news is truly very sad.
#5

wolffenjugend_dup

Apr 24, 2007 5:40:56
Hey! My post got deleted!

Is there any chance we'll still see Dragons of Spring?!?
#6

zombiegleemax

Apr 24, 2007 7:29:20
There is some indication that it will be printed but with MWP track record on prodcuts being late I would not count on it.
#7

zombiegleemax

Apr 24, 2007 7:43:58
According to Ms. Weis 9from the Dragonlance boards @ dragonlance.com:
Originally Posted by Queen of Darkness
I want to assure you that ALL the product we have scheduled to come out in 2007 will come out. We will be allowed to sell off product into 2008.
#8

lancereaver

Apr 24, 2007 8:07:37
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Does this mean, there's no more novels as well? :raincloud
#9

zombiegleemax

Apr 24, 2007 9:11:04
It is my undesrtanding that the novels are solely owned by WotC. So novels will continue, it's just the open gaming licence that has changed here.
#10

zombiegleemax

Apr 24, 2007 11:54:44
I love DL and this is sad news to hear but the company has to make money and they probably won't with them getting away from the core stuff people are going to buy. I plan on completing my collection of DL campaign book sooner rather than later now and hopefully WotC will publish some items for it later or MWP will pick the licence back up in the future.

There has been talk of 4th ed for some time perhaps that is when DL will make its triumphant return to glory. Quite honestly i would have been disappointed to see DL turn into Forgotten Realms where everything is just insane with epic characters everywhere and more broken classes/spells/monsters/ect... than the total put out for other settings.
#11

lordthavian

Apr 24, 2007 13:45:05
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Does this mean, there's no more novels as well? :raincloud

I agree!
Good question about the novel's for they better be continued!
#12

Dragonhelm

Apr 24, 2007 14:02:31
I agree!
Good question about the novel's for they better be continued!

The novels will continue.

I'll reply more later when time permits.
#13

zombiegleemax

Apr 24, 2007 15:29:15
Just another instance of WotC not caring about their customers.

Since they don't care about their customers, I guess I'll just stop caring about whether or not they stay in business or not.

Quite frankly, as long as PCI keeps putting out Arcanis, I could care less about whether or not WOTC stays around.
#14

wolffenjugend_dup

Apr 24, 2007 18:56:29
According to Ms. Weis 9from the Dragonlance boards @ dragonlance.com:
Originally Posted by Queen of Darkness
I want to assure you that ALL the product we have scheduled to come out in 2007 will come out. We will be allowed to sell off product into 2008.

But was Dragons of Winter scheduled for 2007? I haven't seen that anywhere...
#15

valharic

Apr 24, 2007 19:13:47
Cam Banks has mentioned on numerous forums that DoW and DoS will be out before the year is up.
#16

aliothefool

Apr 24, 2007 19:54:21
Surprise, surprise.

First Dragon, and Dungeon magazines don't get their license renewed, now Dragonlance.

You know what Wizards? You just lost another customer. I was going to continue to purchase D&D Minis, but it's really not that great a product to justify me continuing to allow you to screw my favorite companies in the business.

Maybe my dollars don't matter, but the couple grand I've spent over the past couple years are no longer available to you.

Amazing. Truly amazing.
#17

ranger_reg

Apr 24, 2007 20:17:23
It is my undesrtanding that the novels are solely owned by WotC. So novels will continue, it's just the open gaming licence that has changed here.

???

Um, no. It's the exclusive licensing agreement between Wotc and SovPress/MWP that has changed ... or in this case, it's expiring and WotC chose not to renew.

What does the OGL have anything to do with Dragonlance?
#18

zombiegleemax

Apr 24, 2007 22:14:31
The novels, I think, will still continue. They are a major money maker I think, for wotc.
#19

clarkvalentine

Apr 24, 2007 23:45:10
What does the OGL have anything to do with Dragonlance?

Nothing at all - it's just the license MWP had to produce gaming material. The OGL is irrevocable, as I understand it.

Races of Ansalon, Dragons of Krynn, the Map Pouches, and the Dragons of Winter/Spring products are still scheduled to be completed. So hopefully there's still lots of DL goodness left to come.
#20

clarkvalentine

Apr 24, 2007 23:46:24
You, yes YOU Wizards, KILLED MY DRAGONLANCE.

Yes, but reversing it is just a 5th level spell. ;)
#21

darthsylver

Apr 25, 2007 6:02:26
Well I guess we just go back to posting ideas on the nexus.
#22

alakar

Apr 25, 2007 10:27:23
The news is very saddening. I have read and played Dragonlance since I was in High School. I know this might not be the end, but it is definitely a hard medicine to swallow. If WOTC decides to release DL products, I will give them a chance, and dare to hope that they do not kill world that was nurtured for so long. I am not a doomsayer, and do not claim the end is coming, but when I read this news I must admit, a little bit of the gamer in me has died.......
#23

silvanthalas

Apr 25, 2007 14:01:51
I don't game, but I buy the Dragonlance game products nonetheless.

And so this decision by WotC can only lead me to say things that should only be muttered by sailors.

WotC doesn't know how to run a business, so they make sure to ruin everybody else's business too. Thanks for nothing.
#24

zombiegleemax

Apr 25, 2007 15:51:24
I don't game, but I buy the Dragonlance game products nonetheless.

And so this decision by WotC can only lead me to say things that should only be muttered by sailors.

WotC doesn't know how to run a business, so they make sure to ruin everybody else's business too. Thanks for nothing.

Yeah, WotC and business sense don't seem to belong in the same sentence, do they?

I just hope that after WotC folds up D&D because nobody wants to deal with them anymore (kinda like TSR) some company that actually cares about its customers will buy the license.

It'd be a nice change from the WotC greed machine.
#25

draco_paladine

Apr 25, 2007 19:12:48
does this mean that we wont be able to talk on these message boards anymore or what?
#26

zombiegleemax

Apr 25, 2007 20:15:44
I dont think that they will close these boards.
#27

lancereaver

Apr 26, 2007 14:10:41
I sure hope not.
#28

clarkvalentine

Apr 26, 2007 22:30:56
They'd be silly to close them. There are lots of games a lot deader than DL that still have boards here.
#29

zombiegleemax

Apr 26, 2007 22:36:29
Tee hee. Tee hee.
#30

alakar

Apr 27, 2007 11:21:53
This was snipped from a WOTC interview here.

http://boards1.wizards.com/leaving.php?destination=http://www.enworld.org/



This is the question that was posed on the dragonlance license and the reply.



Is the non-renewal of Margaret Weis’ DRAGONLANCE license connected to this or is it just a coincidence?

Scott: No decisions have been made regarding the Dragonlance license, and we don’t discuss the details of ongoing negotiations.


What to make of this, is it possible that DL might continue with MW? Or is this just a smoke screen?
#31

protonik_dup

Apr 27, 2007 18:22:23
It is my undesrtanding that the novels are solely owned by WotC. So novels will continue, it's just the open gaming licence that has changed here.

The OGL hasn't changed at all. What changed was the IP license and who has to right to publish Dragonlance products.
#32

zombiegleemax

Apr 27, 2007 20:58:54
Perhaps WOTC is re-claiming their property so that we can get DL products in a timely fashion?
#33

protonik_dup

Apr 27, 2007 22:07:49
I think it is more a case of lost revenue than anything.
#34

cam_banks

Apr 27, 2007 23:20:11
Perhaps WOTC is re-claiming their property so that we can get DL products in a timely fashion?

That's going to be on your headstone, you know.

"When will it be out?"

Cheers,
Cam
#35

Dragonhelm

Apr 28, 2007 0:12:36
That's going to be on your headstone, you know.

"When will it be out?"

The only good thing about the license not being renewed is that we don't have to hear that any more. :P
#36

zombiegleemax

Apr 28, 2007 1:33:02
If I have said anything that is untrue then demonstrate it.
#37

aliothefool

Apr 28, 2007 6:47:51
That's going to be on your headstone, you know.

"When will it be out?"

Cheers,
Cam



The only good thing about the license not being renewed is that we don't have to hear that any more. :P



If I have said anything that is untrue then demonstrate it.

:OMG!


I just love it when a posting allows me to use multiple smilies to say what I want without words.

Come on Trey, just let it go. We all know how hard MWP/SP and the members of the Whitestone Council have worked over the years to keep Krynn alive. We're all laying down roses and you're throwing rocks. They deserve more than that, don't they? It's not like the products ever just not came out.

Consider WotC always makes their deadlines, and the vast majority of the books is nothing more than page filler, I'd rather purchase products from these guys and gals, who you can tell put all of their heart and soul into making a quality publication.
#38

zombiegleemax

Apr 28, 2007 7:35:29
I have not said that they do not work hard or hardly work, as the case may be and have never said that their products are not quality. I simply said that they have a perpetual habit of being late.

People get hurt and offended when this is mentioned but again they are not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, they do get paid for their work. In my profession we have deadlines. If we do not make the deadlines then we at least have to tell our supervisior that we are going to be late in the project.

In a fanbased system the fans should be told that the product is going to be released and an expected time for release should happen. Months and in some cases years pass in this case and little or no information is forthcoming as to when the product will be relased. If they have no idea then say so. Some information is better than none.
#39

darthsylver

Apr 28, 2007 16:29:25
Personally I would just take the sucker's way out and not tell that a product is going to be released on a certain date until I know that the product is at the printers. Then I would spring it on you at the last minute. But then I would probably have to hear "Are there any new books coming out?" And I would just sit there all nice and quiet.
#40

Dragonhelm

Apr 28, 2007 22:00:23
That's going to be on your headstone, you know.

"When will it be out?"

His nine-month pregnant wife killed him for asking the same question.

Seriously, though, it's understandable when someone is upset over delays. It's just when the individual harps on the issue to the point of annoyance that it becomes a problem.

So the best way to handle it is to ask once (expressing your opinion in a polite manner), wait for your answer, and go on. Just realize that the answer may differ from what you want to hear and don't let it consume you.
#41

ranger_reg

Apr 29, 2007 0:52:49
The only good thing about the license not being renewed is that we don't have to hear that any more. :P

RE: BSG RPG

"When will it be out?" :evillaugh
#42

wolffenjugend_dup

Apr 29, 2007 9:33:26
Seriously, though, it's understandable when someone is upset over delays. It's just when the individual harps on the issue to the point of annoyance that it becomes a problem.

So the best way to handle it is to ask once (expressing your opinion in a polite manner), wait for your answer, and go on. Just realize that the answer may differ from what you want to hear and don't let it consume you.

Quoted for Truth.
#43

zombiegleemax

Apr 29, 2007 11:28:50
However, professionally an answer needs to be given then.
#44

zombiegleemax

Apr 29, 2007 11:39:44
I do not see how asking that products be released when they say they are going to be released or that more information be given about it is a negative thing. Is it a positive thing? No. It simply is and perhaps people should stop seeing them as a personal attack.

Also, I find it odd that when anyone of the employees insults other people there are very few people who protest THAT.
#45

wolffenjugend_dup

Apr 29, 2007 12:03:53
I do not see how asking that products be released when they say they are going to be released or that more information be given about it is a negative thing.

It's not. But when you ask over and over and over again, ad nauseum, it becomes very annoying and borderline trolling.

Yes, we know you don't like it when products are delayed. Now get over it b/c we don't want to hear your whining anymore.
#46

visaudiokin

Apr 30, 2007 1:16:02
It's not. But when you ask over and over and over again, ad nauseum, it becomes very annoying and borderline trolling.

Yes, we know you don't like it when products are delayed. Now get over it b/c we don't want to hear your whining anymore.

For better or for worse, welcome to the age of the internet. People don't wait quietly for next month's magazine to come in on the off chance it will contain information about the movie or game or book they're interested in. People are getting used to being able to get the information they want when they want it.

Which means people like having projected release dates very early in the game . . . but it also means people like frequent updates that reassure them that products are on target for said projected release dates. And if products are going to be delayed, people are gonna want to know that. They'll also want to know the new release dates. Better yet, they'd prefer to know why the products are being delayed.

That's just how I think it tends to work these days. A lot of people don't tend to think that if new information hasn't been released in a few weeks it's because there's nothing new to tell - just that it's being withheld. Consumers are less patient with being kept in the dark these days. Doesn't mean they don't expect to be kept in the dark most of the time - the opposite is true, I think - but it does mean they don't like it.
#47

wolffenjugend_dup

Apr 30, 2007 5:44:20
You can very easily go to the official Dragonlance website and find out when things will be released. Or you can ask politely on this forum. Or you could even send a PM to one of the DL staff.

But to constantly be asking,

Is it out yet?

Is it out yet?

Is it out yet?

Why isn't it our yet?

Is it out yet?

Is just plain annoying and should be stopped by the moderators, IMHO. At some point it moves from being truly a question to being an underhanded way of attacking the publisher.
#48

zombiegleemax

Apr 30, 2007 7:14:43
If the Dragonlance webpage were accurate then that would be a place to go.

Wolfenguard, if you dont like it you dont have to respond.
#49

cam_banks

Apr 30, 2007 8:51:53
Believe it or not, I don't have a problem with folks complaining about things like delays in product releases, or the way stats were taken care of in a specific book, etc.

It's the manner in which it's delivered that makes all the difference.

You can ask about when a book is being released as often as you like, but if you frame the questions as sarcastic statements or snarky digs at the company and/or its employees, then overall the reaction isn't going to be positive.

Cheers,
Cam
#50

gerrin

Apr 30, 2007 11:17:16
If the Dragonlance webpage were accurate then that would be a place to go.

Wolfenguard, if you dont like it you dont have to respond.

This isn't a huge deal, books get delayed all the time. Movies get delayed all the time. I know that sometimes it seems that things are being delayed, but maybe there is another side to the coin. Perhaps the reasoning for the delays, is because these folks are ambitious and try to release things as quick as humanly possible. Sometimes things don't go right, and they have to move the date back. It's part of the entertainment industry.
#51

zombiegleemax

Apr 30, 2007 20:17:56
Get the products out on time or at least give a heads up and people wouldnt be as upset when they dont come out.
#52

zombiegleemax

Apr 30, 2007 23:55:17
I agree with Trey 100%...
#53

true_atlantean

May 01, 2007 7:30:32
Have a listen to the Dragonlance Canticle Episode 4. I believe that they set the right tone, gave some good answers and were the clear head at the moment.

I think that raging at WotC isn't the right thing to do. Sensible discourse is fine, and I understand your aggression to WotC. I love DL, it was the first campaign setting I ran and the first ed setting still has pride of place on my shelf, with all my DL novels. However, does WotC announcing the non-renewal of the license mean I can't play anymore. Certainly not!
It is irritating, it does defy belief and I have been collecting the MWP books and have seen how much attention and quality was poured into them. All the writers/illustrators over there need to be told they have done a damn fine job.

Do I believe that WotC can put the same quality into their releases (if any?)? I seriously don't know because I haven't seen them yet. I'll reserve judgement until then.

I'll agree with Trampas that it doens't mean that DL is dead and that this is a good chance for the fans to rally and keep it alive.
I'm going to keep on playing, no matter who or what is publishing, because I'm happy with what I've got on the shelf and in my head.

I'm not having a go at anyone here - I certainly don't want to be aggressive or demeaning - that is not my style. We can look back fondly, we can experience the uncertainty of the moment now - but we can keep playing.

See you all somewhere on Ansalon.
#54

zombiegleemax

May 01, 2007 8:02:57
Well spoken True Altatean

Thanks Bandit.
#55

darthsylver

May 01, 2007 8:36:43
I just find this whole DL license funny. They outsourced th eproduction of DL products because they could not aford to produce them anymore and decided to center its efforts on a couple of old settings (Greyhawk and FR) and to make a completely new and unknown setting hoping this would generate the revenue they wanted. Now for reasons of their own they apparantly are not allowing the DL seting tobe outsourced anymore which leaves very few conclusions:

1. Wizards is not making as much as they would like so they are taking back their license hoping to get the revenue from it. Hope they can be just as diligent in creating interesting and accurate information about DL as SP.

2. SP Press was making too much money from a product that Wizards felt was dead in the water. Now that somebody else has put the effort into revitializing the setting they want their toy back.

3. Wizards is concerned that DL may be drawing too many consumers away from traditional D&D and therefore intend to kill DL so they may force these consumers to buy D&D.

THis of course is just the conclusions I have come too. If you have others, or more info please say so.
#56

zombiegleemax

May 01, 2007 13:50:02
It is kind of like the old question about how many licks does it take to get to the center of a Tootsie pop. The answer is, "the world may never know".

We will probably never hear why WOTC decided to take back THEIR property.
#57

leowar

May 01, 2007 13:58:32
Every story has a ending and Wotc want to end it.
DL may end but the world and adventures we know will live on in ours hearts and will never end. We will not allow it to end, DRAGONLANCE RULES!!!!

Time is only a illusion.
#58

cam_banks

May 01, 2007 14:46:02
Get the products out on time or at least give a heads up and people wouldnt be as upset when they dont come out.

Again, it's not that people are upset that is at issue here for me, personally. It's how that's expressed.

Cheers,
Cam
#59

visaudiokin

May 01, 2007 15:42:09
Again, it's not that people are upset that is at issue here for me, personally. It's how that's expressed.

Cheers,
Cam

That is the part that I can never understand. I get that people like being regularly updated and kept up to date on what's happening with a release they're looking forward to. I don't see a problem with "are we there yet" type questions as a whole; as a matter of fact, while they may become repetitive for those who read them, that type of impatient anticipation is probably a good thing. And I can certainly understand that missed deadlines can upset people.

It's the rudeness that's inexcusable. I don't get that part at all. I don't know what it's meant to accomplish - it seems entirely counterintuitive. And the me-against-them mentality, where people almost seem to think that the product is late because the producer secretly hates its customers, is highly irrational.
#60

zombiegleemax

May 01, 2007 20:11:06
I have never said that it was an us against them mentality.
#61

visaudiokin

May 01, 2007 20:41:19
I have never said that it was an us against them mentality.

Never said you did I'm just saying there's a tendency for people to freak out a bit too much and start getting rude, acting almost as if there's some sinister ulterior motive for delays and the like. I really wasn't speaking of you specifically. Honestly, at the very least I agree with you wholeheartedly that delays should always be accompanied by as immediate notification as is reasonable.
#62

true_atlantean

May 02, 2007 5:58:05
Well spoken True Altatean

Thanks Bandit.

Many thanks, Trey.

One point that was brought up in the cast was that a new (?) initiative has risen, something with Solomnia in the title, dedicated to new resources.

Does anyone have any leads on the page they were talking about?
Any help would be most gratefully recieved.
#63

zombiegleemax

May 02, 2007 7:53:51
I have not heard about this. If more info is forthcoming please let us know.
#64

true_atlantean

May 03, 2007 5:51:15
I'll check it out tomorrow. Unfortunately, the player program that my computer uses to listen to the 'cast doesn't allow me to fast forward through the show.
However, I certainly don't mind istening to it again. I'll post tomorrow night as soon as I have some more information, then.

Thanks anyway.
#65

zombiegleemax

May 03, 2007 7:31:31
We wait in joyful hope.
#66

valharic

May 05, 2007 11:03:07
I have not heard about this. If more info is forthcoming please let us know.

It's a fan based resource book used in conjucntion with KOoA and the Rise of Solamnia novels to be used for a campaign based inthe region. Dragonhelm and Ravenmantle were the idea men and RM is the lead man putting it together. Here's a quote from him on what they are working on.

What we have so far is we've determined the chapters we want in the book which goes something like this:

Chapter One – Solamnia Rising
Chapter Two – Palanthas
Chapter Three – Solanthus, Thelgaard, and Caergoth
Chapter Four – Other Regions of Solamnia
Chapter Five – Factions of Solamnia
Chapter Six – Playing in a Solamnia Rising Campaign
Appendix One – Game Mechanics
Appendix Two – NPCs

Then we've determined a layout for the cities which is based on the layout used in Mysteries of the Moonsea only with even more detail.

As for the graphic design of the sourcebook, I'm still working on that. But it'll definitely be printer-friendly.

Ravenmantle

Once it's completed it'll be available out on the DLNexus. It's still early in the process, and no release date has been set.
#67

zombiegleemax

May 05, 2007 13:48:55
:D Thanks for keeping us all in the loop Valaharic!!
#68

true_atlantean

May 10, 2007 6:25:37
Thanks, Valaharic.

I've been a little busy in the last week so I wasn't able to get on and post. however, I certainly wouldn't have been able to provide the same level of detail.