3e?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

zombiegleemax

Jun 18, 2003 17:57:19
I know alot of other fansites, like those dedicated to Birthright and Planescape, have been doing their own conversions since wizards is effectivly killing the old settings.

So what are the chances of a 3e mystara?

If there is one coming when will we see it?
#2

samsael

Jun 18, 2003 18:23:46
The thing about Mystara is that it doesn't have many mechanical additions like the other settings do. All Mystara is is a bunch of setting material, which, last I checked, isn't affected by the rules you use.
#3

ranger_reg

Jun 19, 2003 4:07:23
I doubt they're killing the settings. If a legitimate publisher willing to get the license to published a Wizards' campaign setting, then Wizards would profit from it while that publishers do the hard work.

So far, they managed to licensed out Ravenloft, Gamma World, and Dragonlance (Wizards will publish the campaign sourcebook, Sovereign Press will publish DL) support products).

One can hope a publisher who may also be a fan of Mystara/Known World would rise up and take that risky business investment.
#4

samsael

Jun 19, 2003 11:41:46
Actually, the rights to Mystara have already been sold to KenzerCo as the new Hackmaster setting.

I don't know if that's a good thing or not...
#5

ranger_reg

Jun 19, 2003 14:37:59
Then I suggest you consult with Kenzer & Co. for doing right by the true Mystara fans:

Don't turn it into another Hackmaster parody.
#6

zombiegleemax

Jun 19, 2003 16:34:29
The point about them selling the settings is what bothers me. I never Did care for WW and hold them accountable for alot of the problems in my own roleplaying community.


Plus I have read the newRavenloft book and have found it inferior to the old 2e idea. So yes I do believe the term "effectivly killing" fits in this case.
#7

stanles

Jul 01, 2003 14:31:36
Originally posted by Plunderer_of_the_planes
I know alot of other fansites, like those dedicated to Birthright and Planescape, have been doing their own conversions since wizards is effectivly killing the old settings.

So what are the chances of a 3e mystara?

If there is one coming when will we see it?

there's a major, consistent, fan baed effort in that regard at http://mystara3e.starflung.com/home.html
#8

stanles

Jul 01, 2003 14:38:23
Originally posted by Ranger REG
Then I suggest you consult with Kenzer & Co. for doing right by the true Mystara fans:

Don't turn it into another Hackmaster parody.

James Mishler the person who's doing it has been an active member of the Mystara net community for ages, and will hopefully not do too bad a job of things. But as was pointed out in another post earlier a lot of Mystara is about the setting as opposed to the rules so as long as the initial release keeps that in mind and focuses on the setting (and for old hands at the world perhaps even builds on that) then that should hopefully be all good.
#9

zombiegleemax

Jul 04, 2003 14:12:05
Originally posted by samsael
Actually, the rights to Mystara have already been sold to KenzerCo as the new Hackmaster setting.

I don't know if that's a good thing or not...

I think that having them hand over Mystara to Kenzer & co/Hackmaster, was the biggest slight in a long line of WotC slights. WotC knows (better than anyone) K&C's penchant for humor and silliness and to have them "dump" Mystara into the farciful hands of K&C showed an irreverence towards the games past...better it had been left a "dead" setting than turned into a joke.
#10

zombiegleemax

Jul 04, 2003 16:06:43
Well I have taken the time to look at the net 3e conversion and I think they are doing a good job. The work is not close to being finished but I do find it very well done.

The only problem I have is it is like some of the other "unofficial" versions as it is not readily downloadable. Lets just hope th efix that soon.

by the way if you haven't caught it the link is:

http://mystara3e.starflung.com/home.htm



Addendum: so far i have gotten the Mystara info off wotc's site but it is incompleate at best but it is convertable....
#11

zombiegleemax

Jul 04, 2003 16:40:30
Originally posted by skathros
I think that having them hand over Mystara to Kenzer & co/Hackmaster, was the biggest slight in a long line of WotC slights. WotC knows (better than anyone) K&C's penchant for humor and silliness and to have them "dump" Mystara into the farciful hands of K&C showed an irreverence towards the games past...better it had been left a "dead" setting than turned into a joke.

K&C have often stated that they have a "license" to use the old stuff - they do not own them. I'm sure if someone approached WotC with enough cash and/or a good idea, they'd gladly loan out Mystara for a 3rd edition conversion, like they did with White WOlf and Ravenloft.

-Oz
#12

stanles

Jul 04, 2003 17:20:32
Originally posted by skathros
I think that having them hand over Mystara to Kenzer & co/Hackmaster, was the biggest slight in a long line of WotC slights. WotC knows (better than anyone) K&C's penchant for humor and silliness and to have them "dump" Mystara into the farciful hands of K&C showed an irreverence towards the games past...better it had been left a "dead" setting than turned into a joke.

I don't know any of the particulars of what's coming out but I have enough confidence in James's work over the years that I pre-ordered Mystaros. Hopefully I won't be too dissapointed.
#13

zombiegleemax

Jul 05, 2003 11:18:35
If anyone's curious as to the sort of work to expect from Mischler, you could always check out some of the things he has posted at Stan's site

www.dnd.starflung.com

At the search engine, enter "Mischler" and plenty of things will come up.

Personally, I'm not always impressed with his take on things (I'm completely underwhelmed by his list of Thyatian Emperors, to take one example), but that's a matter of preferences and aesthetics. I will say that if you're afraid that he lacks affection for the setting or will be inappropriately silly (Now, guys, c'mon: there was some silliness in some of the old D&D Mystara products, you know; remember "Top Ballista"?), I don't think you should worry too much.

I would expect that anything he has a hand in writing will be lighthearted only where Mystara fans expect lightheartedness, and serious in areas where seriousness is called for.

As for TSR slights, in many ways the best thing they can do for "old" fans such as myself and such as it seems Skathros is, is leave a world alone. By this point, we've all developed our own particular impressions of a gameworld and anything that might be done would "ruin" it in that sense.

(Even worse than doing nothing with a world tends to be leaving it in the hands of fans, I've come to believe. In order to avoid sensitivities I'll take a non-Mystara example; the 3E BR rules written by fans have numerous interesting and creative things, but also major howlers, stuff stuffed in by interest groups the *ahem* elves-above-all-faction; and galleons and caravels and the like were given rams, which is an absurdity of naval architecture. So I have a sudden newfound respect for actual game designers that I lacked before).

However, all of us with settled (crochety) views of what Mystara is like will probably have to eat a couple things we don't like in anything published for it now (that's whether it's done by Kenzer, by fans, or by TSR itself - er, Wizadz itself). The only way to keep the world vital, appeal to a fresh audience, and even maintain a community of Mystaraphiles is new stuff.

Anyhow, I'm babbling; the main point of my post here is that I would encourage folks to go check out the stuff that Mischler has posted up at www.dnd.starflung.com before concluding that he's going to turn the setting into a joke or want to slight it.
#14

zombiegleemax

Jul 06, 2003 8:17:24
I've bantered with Mishler here and there and comes of as someone who knows and genuinly loves the Known Word/Mystara...i have no reservations about the man doing the work. I think he'll do as good a job as the HM rules will allow him to do. Can anyone picture Stefan Karameikos doing the Manu Weasle Dance?
#15

zombiegleemax

Jul 06, 2003 12:18:12
I'm not so sure that HM having Mystara is as comfortable as you think. I was on Kenzer&co's website yesterday and saw the whole Robinloft crap. These guys have no taste.
#16

ranger_reg

Jul 06, 2003 15:00:07
Originally posted by Plunderer_of_the_planes

These guys have no taste.

Well, they have a taste in parody.

I just don't want Mystara to turn into a HM parody of D&D/Rolemaster game.
#17

zombiegleemax

Jul 06, 2003 18:29:55
Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus


However, all of us with settled (crochety) views of what Mystara is like will probably have to eat a couple things we don't like in anything published for it now (that's whether it's done by Kenzer, by fans, or by TSR itself - er, Wizadz itself). The only way to keep the world vital, appeal to a fresh audience, and even maintain a community of Mystaraphiles is new stuff.

.

Oh, and i agree with you 100%. I dont mind change in a setting...even one i've been a fan of for so long. It's the HM aspect that makes me nervouse. Although the books and most of the rules in HM fill me with that "old school" feel, the silliness does not. I'm just cautious and protective of my fav. setting, i suppose. Hey, on the bright side, if Mishler/K&C mess up with Mystara...i still have my complete Gaz collection:D
#18

samsael

Jul 07, 2003 0:55:41
(Now, guys, c'mon: there was some silliness in some of the old D&D Mystara products, you know; remember "Top Ballista

And, after all these years, I just now got the pun behind that title.
#19

zombiegleemax

Jul 07, 2003 1:18:30
Something here I found interestin and is kinda Mystara related.

Dave Arneson is doing a D20 Blackmoor setting.

And as I always try to.....LINK!!!!: http://www.jovianclouds.com/blackmoor/



It also has the original map with the pdf of the original supplement.
#20

agathokles

Jul 07, 2003 2:44:07
Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus
... be inappropriately silly (Now, guys, c'mon: there was some silliness in some of the old D&D Mystara products, you know; remember "Top Ballista"?), I don't think you should worry too much.

OTOH, there is a big difference between Mystara's and K&Co's silliness. Mystaran stuff like Top Ballista were usually parodies of widespread RW clichès (from history, cinema, comics and tv), while K&Co strikes me as mostly devoted to parodies of gaming habits, campaign settings, and other stuff that is directly linked to the gaming community.

As for fan works resulting in lower quality, well, it would have been weird is the opposite were true. Yet, even in the Birthright case there are a few high points (e.g., I think the classes were well done). Of course, much depends on which fans are working on the setting, and what they are doing, as the Ravenloft example shows.

GP
#21

zombiegleemax

Jul 07, 2003 2:56:32
And Agathokles comment was?
#22

agathokles

Jul 07, 2003 3:14:13
Originally posted by Plunderer_of_the_planes
And Agathokles comment was?

Sorry, editing problems ;)
#23

zombiegleemax

Jul 07, 2003 10:34:12
Originally posted by Agathokles
OTOH, there is a big difference between Mystara's and K&Co's silliness. Mystaran stuff like Top Ballista were usually parodies of widespread RW clichès (from history, cinema, comics and tv), while K&Co strikes me as mostly devoted to parodies of gaming habits, campaign settings, and other stuff that is directly linked to the gaming community.

I suppose. OtoH, tons of people like the Thar Gaz, but the included gamelet is silliness personified, and Thar's military handbook (name escapes me at the moment) isn't really serious; IMO that's mostly gamer-oriented. Modules like "The Best of Intentions", likewise.

Anyhow, I suppose my main point is that we can wait and see what is produced; there will still be plenty of time for the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments then.

It doesn't affect any of us who don't want to be affected by it (as dude pointed out, we still have all our old junk; K &Co aren't going to drive up in a black van and cart it all away in the dead of night). I'm speaking as someone who's probably not going to be too keen on it, myself, but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

I'm sort of curious as to the "when" they'll be setting it; will it be taking off from where the Almanacs left off, or in the AC 1000 era (which is quite possibly the period most of the remaining Mystara gamers still play in. "Longest Year On Record" - j/k). I'm pretty sure that a lot of what Michler writes will be so different from my take as to be unusable to me, but other stuff could very well be cool. We're also assuming that it will be sillied-up-the-wazzo, which might not be the case (we'll have to see, and one could always try to write the guy and ask, see what he says. The one constructive method of expressing a worry at this point, which takes advantage of the fact that nothing's been published yet, is to write the people behind the project expressing whatever concerns you have, and they might take them into account, at least to some extent. Who knows? They won't beat you with iron rods for trying, at least I don't think they will. Not since that last time).

Yet, even in the Birthright case there are a few high points (e.g., I think the classes were well done).

The classes are solid. Some of the rules modifications/tweeks are very good. It's a bit uneaven, though, and some of the things that were tossed in (such as making Sources "virtual guilds") are dubious at best. And the Great Ramming Galleon is right out bizzare.

I didn't know you were into BR, though, Ag, or I'd have sent you this link to Solmyr's current BR PBEM, if you're interested (heavy rules mods of his own to balance things better):

http://enothril.topcities.com/AOS/

I keep trying to nag him into doing another MBr. One of these days. . .
#24

zombiegleemax

Jul 07, 2003 11:17:48
Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus
I didn't know you were into BR, though, Ag,

Actually, upon further reflection, I did know, I had just forgotten.
#25

jonesy

Jul 07, 2003 11:40:51
Now, guys, c'mon: there was some silliness in some of the old D&D Mystara products, you know; remember "Top Ballista"?

OtoH, tons of people like the Thar Gaz, but the included gamelet is silliness personified, and Thar's military handbook (name escapes me at the moment) isn't really serious; IMO that's mostly gamer-oriented. Modules like "The Best of Intentions", likewise.

Ah yes, Top Ballista, The Orcs of Thar and The Best of Intentions. *takes a trip down memory lane* (not that long a trip really, since we are still playing the same Mystara campaign we started with OD&D). Those three were, and are, the best of Mystara. They are also rather silly which isn't really a bad thing when done as well as in those three (read that again). Do you still remember what you had to do to become a shaman of Bagni Gullymaw?
#26

agathokles

Jul 09, 2003 2:43:00
Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus
Actually, upon further reflection, I did know, I had just forgotten.

IIRC, we even played in the same Savage Coast / BR PbeM game for a short while.
#27

agathokles

Jul 09, 2003 2:54:07
Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus
Anyhow, I suppose my main point is that we can wait and see what is produced; there will still be plenty of time for the gnashing of teeth and rending of garments then.

It doesn't affect any of us who don't want to be affected by it (as dude pointed out, we still have all our old junk; K &Co aren't going to drive up in a black van and cart it all away in the dead of night). I'm speaking as someone who's probably not going to be too keen on it, myself, but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

Indeed, at worst it can result in a botched attempt that will hurt no one, at best, it will add a little (too many space constraints for such a big setting) to the setting.

Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus
The classes are solid. Some of the rules modifications/tweeks are very good. It's a bit uneaven, though, and some of the things that were tossed in (such as making Sources "virtual guilds") are dubious at best. And the Great Ramming Galleon is right out bizzare.

Actually, I've only seen classes and races up to now--I'm not into 3e that much, so I've just scanned through the pdf to see what the BR people were up to. But yes, the ramming galleon has serious problems.

Originally posted by Porphyrogenitus
I didn't know you were into BR, though, Ag, or I'd have sent you this link to Solmyr's current BR PBEM, if you're interested (heavy rules mods of his own to balance things better):

Too many PbeM campaigns right now, I fear...

Bye,
GP
#28

stanles

Jul 09, 2003 22:01:46
Originally posted by samsael
And, after all these years, I just now got the pun behind that title.

Egad, what was tyhe pun behind Top Ballista, I don't think I've got it.
#29

zombiegleemax

Jul 09, 2003 22:12:10
It was a TOP GUN knockoff right?
#30

stanles

Jul 09, 2003 22:31:02
Originally posted by Plunderer_of_the_planes
It was a TOP GUN knockoff right?

oh yeah ... that makes sense
#31

zombiegleemax

Jul 10, 2003 4:09:20
James Mishler has answered some fan's questions about what the Hacklopedia is going to contain and about his take on Mystara on the Vaults of Pandius site - I think there are links to his replies from the VoP title page.

And fans on Kenzer's forums have asked him how serious/silly it will be. He said it will be relatively serious, for a Hackmaster product. I think Kenzer realise that the fan base for this product is Mystara fans rather than Knights of the Dinner Table fans - also they have had complaints from HM fans about recent over-the-top silliness that prompted them to change one of the modules they are working on to make it more serious.

Having said that, if you read what James has to say, you'll see it won't be the same as the Mystara portrayed in the Gazetteers (it will be set in AC 1000 though). I don't mind that. My own Mystata is pretty different from the Gazetteer Mystara - the Atraughin Clans are celtic in my world, for example; basically I've relocated the Thyatian Hinterlands there (it never made sense to me to have American Indians in between Sind and Darokin, and Irish celts living in a tropical jungle).

I think it's a good thing that there's no single, tidy, official version of Mystara - it means the DM can choose whichever take on a particular place he prefers, and the the players will find it more difficult to use out-of-game knowledge about the game world. I'll be buying the Hackmaster product and I'm hoping I'll find lots of good stuff in it but I sure won't use it exactly as written.
#32

ranger_reg

Jul 10, 2003 4:31:02
I don't know. I would like a MCSB, with thick realm books like Thyatis and Karameikos, similar to FR's Silver Marches and Unapproachable East.
#33

rotipher

Jul 14, 2003 6:53:37
Well, just remember that there'd never really been *one* "official" Mystara, in the first place! The setting's history changed with every Gazetteer, back in the Golden Age (remember all those spinoff variants of the shadow elves' origins?), plus there's the VPA vs RS conflict over the Savage Coast and the previous conversions of Karameikos and Glantri to AD&D. If you don't like Mystaros' work when you see it, you can just chalk it up to one of those "parallel universe" things...
#34

zombiegleemax

Jul 26, 2003 5:02:12
First of all I'll confess that I am a HackMaster fan. It is simply a version of AD&D and fun to play. That is all that matters IMHO.

Now, I played AD&D before I played HM and before I played AD&D I played D&D and I have fond memories of the Known world. It was the first world I ever adventured in after all.

But I have to speak up for Kenzer & Co and also hopefully allay some fears re the HM Mystara. K&C put out some very good products and deal well with their customers. For this alone they deserve some respect. As to the HM Mystara simply because HM are doing it it does not preclude anyone else from doing it.

K&C have a licence to use all pre-3e material to create and support HM but I do not believe it is exclusive. Why not? Because one can buy Robinloft for HM but one can also buy the Ravenloft campaign setting for 3e put out by Sword & Sorcery Studios (IIRC).

So if you don't like HM don't but the Mystara HM setting. Lobby WotC and other d20 companies to put out a Mystara 3e setting. If you demonstrate there is enough interest in it they may do it. And failing that just play BECM D&D in the Known World. It's a pretty good game.
#35

zombiegleemax

Jul 26, 2003 10:09:37
ok kenzer put out good products....hmmm kingdoms of kalamar was ok then we get Gawds and demigawds....i thunk I'll pass
#36

kesh

Jul 26, 2003 13:22:07
There's only a couple products I know of that would take a lot of effort to convert:

1) Mystara Monstrous Compendium - This is the AD&D 2e monster compilation, and it's rather large. Lots 'n lots of critters in here to convert. you might just want to pick 'n choose the ones you need instead.

2) Red Steel - Gah. I'm working on converting this setting, and let me tell you, it ain't gonna get published. If I followed Wizard's guidelines, the results would be completely unbalanced (*cough* swasbuckling style rules *cough*). Some things need edited down, while others just need cut or completely re-written. The only way I could publish such a thing would be to become an official campaign setting site, which I don't have the time to devote to, really. Or, if someone liscenced the setting.