Aurak errata

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

michael_tree_dup

Sep 18, 2003 20:06:28
In the Aurak's shapechanging ability (whose actual name I can't check because I don't have the book handy) it says first that they can only change into animals, then it says that it works like polymorph except it can only be used to change into humanoids, and then in the next sentence it mentions animals again. Well, which is it?
#2

zombiegleemax

Sep 18, 2003 22:19:02
Well, given a choice between the two i would go with humanoids... I mean, it has already been confirmed by the novels...
#3

zombiegleemax

Sep 19, 2003 8:10:02
Originally posted by Apocalyp$e
Well, given a choice between the two i would go with humanoids... I mean, it has already been confirmed by the novels...

Sure that's Auraks you're thinking of, not Silvaks (the ones you always see impersonating humans)? I'd go with the animals one, as it's mentioned more often. Then again, i don't know much bout auraks other than they're insanely powerful.
#4

Granakrs

Sep 19, 2003 14:11:17
I think what's happening is a confusion with Disguise Self, which is Humanoid only, and Alternate Form, which is the Animal form they can take. The books themselves, does say alternate form or disguise self, only that the aurak takes a form, either humanoid or animal.

In my mind, keep disguise as purely humanoid, and Alternate form as animal.