Sir Liam Ehrling and the Inquisitor PrC

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

mula

Sep 23, 2003 4:04:26
The lord of Castle uth Wistan (sp?) Sir Liam Ehrling is, according to AoM, a 21st-level character. This really isn't the case, is it?

And the Inquisitor: the first level class feature which allows you to use your ranks in Concentration to get a skill bonus is senseless - the class doesn't even require ranks in Concentration! Why such a useless ability?
#2

cam_banks

Sep 23, 2003 8:09:38
Originally posted by Mula
The lord of Castle uth Wistan (sp?) Sir Liam Ehrling is, according to AoM, a 21st-level character. This really isn't the case, is it?

Yes, it really is the case.

And the Inquisitor: the first level class feature which allows you to use your ranks in Concentration to get a skill bonus is senseless - the class doesn't even require ranks in Concentration! Why such a useless ability?

It's not useless! Not requiring ranks in Concentration doesn't make it any less a valid class feature. Many of the characters which would take this class - clerics, wizards, etc - already have ranks in Concentration. Thus, it's very suitable. It would be a simple matter to add "4 ranks in Concentration" if you were concerned about its absence as a requirement but it really isn't necessary.

Cheers,
Cam
#3

mula

Sep 24, 2003 1:07:17
But you know, I can become a better Inquisitor just by taking rogue levels... more skills are the key. The Inquisitor's class features that supposedly make him good at solving crimes etc are pretty useless. Too bad, I really like the concept.