Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 mula Sep 23, 2003 4:04:26	The lord of Castle uth Wistan (sp?) Sir Liam Ehrling is, according to AoM, a 21st-level character. This really isn't the case, is it? And the Inquisitor: the first level class feature which allows you to use your ranks in Concentration to get a skill bonus is senseless - the class doesn't even require ranks in Concentration! Why such a useless ability?
#2 cam_banks Sep 23, 2003 8:09:38	Originally posted by Mula The lord of Castle uth Wistan (sp?) Sir Liam Ehrling is, according to AoM, a 21st-level character. This really isn't the case, is it? Yes, it really is the case. And the Inquisitor: the first level class feature which allows you to use your ranks in Concentration to get a skill bonus is senseless - the class doesn't even require ranks in Concentration! Why such a useless ability? It's not useless! Not requiring ranks in Concentration doesn't make it any less a valid class feature. Many of the characters which would take this class - clerics, wizards, etc - already have ranks in Concentration. Thus, it's very suitable. It would be a simple matter to add "4 ranks in Concentration" if you were concerned about its absence as a requirement but it really isn't necessary. Cheers, Cam
#3 mula Sep 24, 2003 1:07:17	But you know, I can become a better Inquisitor just by taking rogue levels... more skills are the key. The Inquisitor's class features that supposedly make him good at solving crimes etc are pretty useless. Too bad, I really like the concept.