Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Grummore Nov 25, 2003 16:53:36	Sooo, anything new? :D What about a new update of what's coming up on athas.org page? The emissary? Something else? Tell us what's going on next? Give us some power to create and help you! Muhahahaha ! I know you like this :invasion:
#2 jon_oracle_of_athas Nov 25, 2003 18:53:31	Bah. Go away.
#3 zombiegleemax Nov 26, 2003 1:30:53	If we could, we would. However, I've learned that most of us are under the sway of a very high level compulsion or thrall effect and are not able to leave these boards for fear of serious reprocutions. I'm betting it was Gab myself, the little gremlin icon is just a cover up as to his true nature.
#4 jon_oracle_of_athas Nov 26, 2003 3:34:56	It's the damn shrine I tell you. There's something funny going on at that shrine...
#5 Grummore Nov 27, 2003 21:00:27	I think I killed Flip... :headexplo With this last thread Flip... Where are you?
#6 jon_oracle_of_athas Nov 28, 2003 3:43:00	The Death of Corn spell got him... if not it, the Fiendish Dire Turkey choked him to death.
#7 zombiegleemax Nov 28, 2003 5:05:33	Dire Turkey! Must make up stats and toss it at unsuspecting party . . . (hmmm, mental note to keep mop and bucket handy for I'm sure tossing a dire turkey at any kind of party, unuspecting or otherwise, is sure to make a large mess).
#8 zombiegleemax Nov 28, 2003 8:20:04	Well, since we're all invited to bother Flip, here I come with my piece of contribution. Btw, my post is directed to all Athas.org staff, so nobody will complain about one being prefered... hehehe 1. I would send it as a e-mail to errata at athas.org but I didn't know if it was really an errata, pardon me if this matter was already discussed somewhere else.. (no lightning bolts Jon...) 2. On page 34, the following weapons are stated as ranged, but there's no range defined at Table 6-4: Athasian Weapons: alhulak, Fixed Crusher, Datchi Club, Tkaesali. (although I've seen that the ranges were defined at each one's descriptions, shouldn't they be shown on Table 6-4 too?) 3. Another, why are the Crusher and the Datchi club considered melee weapons if its stated at their description that you cannot use then against an adjacent foe? 4. Shouldn't the throwing sap be considered a ranged instead of a melee weapon?? 5. How come that someone with two alaks joined by a rope 5 foot long (the cahulak description) can strike an opponent 10 foot away... is this a rubber rope?(pag. 35)
#9 Grummore Nov 28, 2003 13:01:10	Fabricio, the problem with your post is... well... It's because it is constructive! :D When do you think Flip will appear here, to flip me on the good side? I am probably on the darkside right now, with my bothering light saber!
#10 Grummore Nov 28, 2003 13:01:16	Argl!
#11 flip Nov 28, 2003 17:23:14	Originally posted by Fabrício Madruga Lopes Well, since we're all invited to bother Flip, here I come with my piece of contribution. *mutter* See, when Grummore decides to pesterme for the sake of pestering me... 1. I would send it as a e-mail to errata at athas.org but I didn't know if it was really an errata, pardon me if this matter was already discussed somewhere else.. (no lightning bolts Jon...) Meh. You can still send. I'm actulaly able to answer these things, even if it's not strictly speaking errata ... even confusion can lead to corrections ... 2. On page 34, the following weapons are stated as ranged, but there's no range defined at Table 6-4: Athasian Weapons: alhulak, Fixed Crusher, Datchi Club, Tkaesali. (although I've seen that the ranges were defined at each one's descriptions, shouldn't they be shown on Table 6-4 too?) No, they're stated as reach. Reach weapons are not ranged weapons. The Range Increment field is for things like bows,and melee weapons you can throw. Range Increment means: Every $increment feet, you subtract 2 from the attack roll. 3. Another, why are the Crusher and the Datchi club considered melee weapons if its stated at their description that you cannot use then against an adjacent foe? Same reason you can't use a longspear against an adjacent foe. "Normal" (that is, stiff) reach weapons can only be used against enemies a certain distance away. Once you close, you've either got to drop the longspear and use a shorter weapon, or back away. 4. Shouldn't the throwing sap be considered a ranged instead of a melee weapon?? You let go of ranged weapons. The throwing sap is really a big bag on the end of a rope that you swing around. 5. How come that someone with two alaks joined by a rope 5 foot long (the cahulak description) can strike an opponent 10 foot away... is this a rubber rope?(pag. 35) This is probably a valid point ... a few of our rope lengths are probably too short. Throwing sap suffers from the same issue.
#12 zombiegleemax Nov 28, 2003 17:42:51	Well... thank you anyway.. so after all it just a big misunderstanding?? Except the throwing sap... :D , yes! One score to me!!!
#13 nytcrawlr Dec 01, 2003 14:23:10	Those damn, silly dire turkeys, always making a mess and taking out the party. Pretty tasty though. So are silly frogs, muwhahahaha.
#14 zombiegleemax Dec 01, 2003 15:55:11	Silly Frogs . . . taste like chicken! Your family will never know you switched! Failed campaign slogan.
#15 Grummore Dec 01, 2003 18:12:01	Originally posted by Mach2.5 Silly Frogs . . . taste like chicken! Your family will never know you switched! Failed campaign slogan. :invasion: Btw you ! the Mach ! Do you look your email sometime??