A big PS game

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

bob_the_efreet

Dec 07, 2003 4:20:01
So, I was thinking about Planescape. And I came to a few conclusions here. First off, I was thinking about the point of a canon setting. And it's so that we're all on the same page. But what good does that really do us, other than if I talk about Mechanus and Rilmani, everyone else knows what I'm talking about? Now, what it would be really good for is if we all (or at least, whoever's interested) agreed that we'd all be playing in the same PS game. As in, we're all running/playing PS with our own gaming group, but all these groups were present in the multiverse together, instead of us each having our own seperate (but mostly identical) multiverses. As a reference for a type of campaign actually being played like this, I present Portals of Midwrathe: http://midwrathe.d20rpg.org/

So... opinions? Other places I should make the proposal?
#2

factol_rhys_dup

Dec 07, 2003 8:48:30
I think it might be cool, but the problem is, the best thing about Planescape is the epic happenings. What about plane-shattering events? In Planescape, you can't confine PC's to one region so DM's have individual control. Every DM would just be in charge of one party and it'd just be updates on a site of "OK, here's what happened in our campaign today so make note of the changes to the multiverse." Then someone else comes by and says "What? Aww, pikin' sod! I needed Asmodeus to still be alive for my next adventure!"
#3

zombiegleemax

Dec 07, 2003 13:51:31
I'm not entirely sure I understand how this would work but from the gist I get, everyone posts the events in their campaign and those events get put into canon? First, I think that'd need moderation. Considerable moderation so some DMs don't go psycho-power-crazy and kill Asmodeus, Demogorgon, the Lady, etc.

I think that if something like this were to be put into effect, it might as well be a PBeM or PBP RPG set in the Multiverse. I think it'd have more clout and less conflict, plus people would be more easily able to see how the events -- be they epic and plane-shattering or simply affecting a localized area -- came to be.
#4

zombiegleemax

Dec 07, 2003 14:43:21
You mean like the Living Greyhawk campaign that the RPGA has been running?
#5

Ornum

Dec 07, 2003 15:11:31
This is of course an obvious statement, but such a thing would be voluntary. You couldn't exactly force anyone to do this. Nice idea, though. I like the idea of a community continium in Planescape, and the sheer scope of the setting allows it. All who agree could post the results of campaigns, and a group of people that are in the know could moderate what is posted, and even tone it down if necessary, to make sure that things pretty much stay the same. If not, the you would get things like "What do you mean the proxy of Zeus is in a coma? We're in a middle of a mission by his request! Shemeska would be one such person to moderate, since involvement in the actual setting has already been established (subject to availability and agreement, cause I'm not volunteering a 'loth to do anything against it's will, especially that one!).
If this were to come to anything, of course, at least three things should happen.
1. All interested parties should state the fact that this is something they would like to be involved with.
2. From the pool of said interested parties, a sort of moderating group should be established.
3. Said interested parties should submit suggestions for a set of guidelines to be used when running adventures, with the mods having final approval.
Do these suggestions sit well with everyone, or is such an idea only a pipe dream? Personally, I would love the chance for us to unify in our love for the setting into a true community, and show the non-believers what group solidarity can accomplish.
#6

bob_the_efreet

Dec 07, 2003 16:46:43
All of your suggestions seem reasonable, Ornum. Although, Rhys brings up a good point (bloody Ciphers). I just assumed I'd need to tone down my epic, far-reaching ideas, but I hadn't thought about that detracting from the general PS feel. And, of course, I meant for it to be voluntary. I wouldn't propose to force campaign conformity on someone's game where it wasn't wanted.
#7

Ornum

Dec 07, 2003 17:19:47
The more I think about it, the more interested I become, actually. Of course, I believe that maybe this forum wouldn't be appropriate for lengthy discussions of "here's what happened in our last outing in Planescape" because if popularity of the idea of a shared cannon community became overly abundant, those posts coul encompass too much of the board, causing non-members to have to wade through too many threads to find what they are looking for or have their posts with serious questions be rooted off the first page and thus negatively effecting the probability of having their posts answered.
Maybe, if other users of this board decide that such an idea is appealling to them, we could use this board as an initial set up, just to get everything squared away, then move off-site somewhere for the posting of the guidelines and the results of adventures, as well as discussions of how to properly merge the new material with the setting as it exists. Such a site could be something as simple as a newly created Yahoo! Group, where a message board, chat room, and updateable calender for scheduling meetings are included. Or not, depending on your opinion of Yahoo!, but it's just an example of a quick, and more importantly, FREE, community site could be established. Also, the link to said site could be placed in the sigs of members that also post here, just to direct others who might be interested.
Just a few ideas that I'm tossing around, here guys. Are there others interested? If so, I'm sure that you have better ideas on how to establish such a thing.
#8

primemover003

Dec 08, 2003 15:40:57
Our own Living Sigil as it were? I'm in. I'm in.
#9

factol_rhys_dup

Dec 08, 2003 16:07:43
Has anyone here ever tried a forum-based campaign? It seems like there are some great planescapers, and I don't know many around me who know about PS. I've not had much luck with making them interesting, but if anybody thinks they know how to make it work, we could try it out with some of the folks from around the forums...
#10

zombiegleemax

Dec 08, 2003 16:56:04
Personally, I would like to run a forum-based campaign, but if I did so, it would be strictly fluff. Crunch would have little to no actual place in the game. Through message boards, I believe that story-based is far, far easier to manage than numbers and dice. I have tried to run a free-play Planescape game before, where players could adventure where they wanted and do whatever they wanted, but it didn't get off the ground. I've kind of pushed it off to the side for a while until I have the time and opportunity to figure out what I need to do to fix it and make it more appealing.

At any rate, if someone needs a forum, I have several hundred MB of unused webspace that I can offer.
#11

Ornum

Dec 09, 2003 3:33:22
Thanks for the offer, Center of All. If this manages to get off the ground in any way, then I shall contact you to discuss the basics of setting something up. I personally don't have any experience with any form of web design (I need to take a course, so I think I'll try and add that class to next semester's schedule), so I hope that you or someone else that has such experience will choose to become a part of this effort and be willing to help.
Problem is, I don't know if there is enough interest in such a project to even warrant the effort. I, for one, am definitely in. It seems that Primemover003 is in as well, judging by his post. Also, I assume that Bob the Efreet is in since he is the originator of the idea. I'll keep hope alive and push for it, until either it gets off the ground or everyone else tells me to stop.
As for the forum based campaign that you describe, maybe such a thing could be included with our plans. Such a campaign's ongoing results would become automatic cannon for the community's version of the setting. Also, DM's that run paper & pen PS with their own groups would submit results of their individual campaigns that are to be reviewed and, after either being accepted as is or revised as needed, subsequently added into cannon as well.
My question is can these ideas actually work, or is it too broad in scope and ambition to actually get off of the ground?
#12

bob_the_efreet

Dec 09, 2003 6:40:06
The forum-based game could work out. And I like the idea of combining it with the big PS game. We even have a Rilmani offering to run the forum-side game. Should we take the proposal to the PS mailing list? Might get a few more interested parties there.
#13

zombiegleemax

Dec 09, 2003 10:19:19
Currently I don't have a gaming group to play with, so I guess I can't join unfortunately
#14

zombiegleemax

Dec 09, 2003 12:23:55
I don't know how much running I'dbe able to personally do, but I can give you the forum and some web-hosting space for free if you like. I have a bit on my plate right now, including a few other projects I have to work on (plus I'm anxiously anticipating when Planewalker is ready for more help and I can finally sign on with them ;)).

To make a long story short, I don't have the time to moderate such a game, especially not by myself. I'd rather just give you the space, let you moderate, and I'll pop in here and there.
#15

law

Dec 09, 2003 13:22:31
As Center of All knows im starting a PBP game at RoE. Its a good place for an online game if you can get a DM there. As the games still in its stage when its just geting ready to start (dont have any char sheets yet from the plauers). Just so you all know that theres games going on online already.

It would be a good idea if we had the people and such that are willing.
#16

zombiegleemax

Dec 09, 2003 14:56:26
Speaking of that game, you still need to get back to me on my Rilmani PC idea =P
#17

zombiegleemax

Dec 09, 2003 15:00:13
What's an RoE? I do hanker for a good PS game.
#18

zombiegleemax

Dec 09, 2003 15:12:10
I personally don't have any experience with any form of web design (I need to take a course, so I think I'll try and add that class to next semester's schedule)

I've got some web design skills (caveat: only works properly on CSS2-compiant browsers) and some time to work on a project like this. I've also got some space left on my hosting service for something like this. I've also got some PHP and perl coding skills, (and I know a passable amount of SQL) so it's possible I could be talked into adding a feature or two to an already existing CMS if need be. We oughta set up an IRC room too, if this is going to get off the ground. Just because all the cool kids have IRC chans.
#19

saurstalk

Dec 09, 2003 15:30:08
Isn't Living Greyhawk set up that it's controlled? I.e., the players are given a campaign to get through and the outcome of the campaign effects the setting. It's not chaotic. From what I understand, you propose that the canon would reflect "whatever the group does." For you scheme to work, some "master" of the multiverse would need to dictate where a campaign can begin and limit the parameters of where that campaign goes ... and what can be done (or can't be done).

Frankly, if we all has some elected leader to pose as the Lady of Pain, this might be fun. But I'm also for a little more freedom in running my campaigns!
#20

sildatorak

Dec 09, 2003 15:50:47
Originally posted by Primus, the One and Prime
What's an RoE? I do hanker for a good PS game.

I would assume that RoE is Realms of Evil but not 100% sure.
#21

law

Dec 09, 2003 17:11:41
Center of All one we can work on it later. I said go with something simple for now. Making a race for 3E is a pain (plus I need some back ground of that one (like how many types there are and such)).

Sildatorak yes that the site its even in my sig. The bone box rattler is a forum that caters only to planescape (they dont get much traffic even his close to 90 people).
#22

Ornum

Dec 10, 2003 20:00:56
To mrgoat:
I'm glad that you have the ability to code for a website, the spare time to do it, and that you are also willing to do it. I don't have any problem with you involvement, I openly welcome it, if fact, so I'll reserve the right to discuss this further with you in the future when and if this proposal gets off the ground, if that suits you.

To Saurstalk:
As I see it, the limits shouldn't be overly ridiculous, just based on common sense. Simple things such as no serious alterations to the planes themselves, and such. These guidelines are more for setting limits to power gamers who like to allow PC's to kill gods at will or otherwise change the multiverse in ways that normal players would consider insane. But on the same note, if posts from this board are any indication, such guidelines would normally be followed in the games that are currently being run by people here. Most all of us understand that you don't change too much when you play PS without an exceptional reason as it totally disrupts the entire concept of the setting.
As for the Lady of Pain analogy that you used, it wouldn't be a single person that had such control, but instead a group of moderators that would work together to decide on any guidelines to be used and also work together in determining what will be "official" cannon for the community. While I'm sure that the moderators would have disagreements from time to time, it seems to me that such a system is better than any one person having absolute control.
There are things to be worked out still, such as who exactly would be moderating in the first place and how would moderators be chosen, but until enough interest in the project is shown, then such generalizations of how such a group campaign would ideally be run is good enough for the moment.

To Sword_Of_Geddon:
I wouldn't want to leave out you or anyone else who doesn't have a gaming group, that is why I'm so interested in find a way for the forum based campaign to work. Besides, at least the posts you have given in reply to some of my statements convince me that you would be a valuable addition.

To Bob the Efreet:
I hope that you don't think that I'm stealing your idea or that I'm stepping on your toes by taking an acitive role in pushing for this. It is your idea, after all. I'm just doing my part to try and get this off of the ground.

To anyone involved in the Planewalker conversion:
I in no way want to ursurp you authority on the subject of Planescape. Our community is solely an option for players to enjoy the game together. Nothing you write will be contradicted or even placed on the site. I would rather link to the rules that you are developing. Your hard work is appreciated, as the cancellation of PS effectively killed my enthusiasm for the game, and your work has brought me back to the game.

To everyone else:
Man, I'm long-winded. Just wanted to state that I am of the opinion that anything we choose to be cannon for the group should be fluff, without too much crunch. I don't think that what we all need is more rules upon rules upon rules. I guess that some amount of rules may be needed if we create a new site or two, but I don't want an insane amount. Of course, this is my opinion and what we include would be based on what the majority of users wants, not on my personal beliefs on the subject.
Two things that I would choose for the guidelines, for example, would be (A) No stats for the gods would be used. They are too powerful to be defeated, so quantifying their abilities is a moot points. Only their domain, alignment, plane of residence, beliefs and divine rank will be used. (B) No epic levels. Don't like 'em, don't want to use 'em. Others may disagree, so if the majority wants it different, then so be it. My word is not law. I'm merely an instrument to get this thing going, nothing more. I'm not even interested in being a mod, as there are others out there that are WAY more knowledgeable than I about the subject of PS and therefore they need to moderate. I'll help in the initial construction, but after that, I'm a member, nothing more.
#23

primemover003

Dec 10, 2003 21:30:44
Well even though I'm no programmer, just about EVERY supplement of PS is at my beck and call and feel I'm a pretty competant DM in general. Been one for 10 years, 6 of those exclusively in PS. I read every book put out as if it were a Novel in the FR line. I'm also an adherent of the status quo (ala Rilmani or Mordenkainen's Circle of Eight). I'd be happy to take on some of the duties of moderator.

I think any of my fellow diehards here on the PS and MotP boards would probably agree that I'm something of a greybeard and almost always on... Anyone may dissent (my Natural armor bonus is high) Also my take on the Ridiculous levels is well... well you know my take.:devil
#24

zombiegleemax

Dec 10, 2003 23:03:23
I think any of the graybeards around here owuld be awesome DMs. I think all of you know it alls (Primemover, Incenjucar, Shemeska, and a host of others) oughta come over to RoE and start games. COME! I command it!
#25

bob_the_efreet

Dec 10, 2003 23:20:05
Ornum: Not a problem at all. I actually like that someone's showing this much enthusiasm for the idea.

I also agree that a small council of moderators would work better than one person holding the reigns. As for ridiculous-level characters... I don't mind character level >20, I do mind the Ridiculous Level Handbook. Although if other people want to have epic characters in their games, so long as they don't walk around causing all kinds of disruption to the status quo we'd like to maintain, I don't really see why we should try to stop them.
#26

zombiegleemax

Dec 10, 2003 23:21:19
I believe this is a good idea. So what is this council going to do? Is it going to review plots BEFOREHAND? Or will people post little summaries of their plots so far and the council will create a great tapestry and post it to make sure everyone knows what's going on?
#27

zombiegleemax

Dec 10, 2003 23:23:18
Another thing that may be needed. A common calender. As long as we have a calender, and people pick when their games start then we can create a proper timeline of events.
#28

Ornum

Dec 10, 2003 23:35:21
Primus, my opinion on the subject (however far that goes) is that anyone wishing to participate would use a set of guidelines to run their campaign within. I think that the guidelines should limit as little possible, but something should be in place to keep the insanity down to a minimum. From there, invididual DM's run their individual campaigns and then submit the results to the site, where the mods decide what to include in the continuity, hopefully keeping the majority, if not all, in tact.
Also, the forum based campaign idea would be ran by (hopefull) one or more of the mods and be considered automatic cannon for the community.
Of course, this is all only speculation on my part and how things are actually going to be ran are dependant on the ideas of others who wish to participate.
Good idea on the calendar, too. As such, what is the "offical" Planescape timeline format? FR uses Dale Reckoning, so what is the Planescape equivalent?
#29

xanxost_the_slaadi_dup

Dec 11, 2003 0:04:26
Xanxost would love to participate.

However Xanxost has no gaming group right now, so sad. And even if he did, all of Xanxost's Planescape books are in another state right now.

But Xanxost would like to help primemover moderate, or at least brainstorm. There are lots of storms on Limbo.
#30

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 0:15:51
Xanxost, much of the gaming would be online. Online gaming is easier than face-to-face gaming, though it is far more transient. That's the tradeoff. You can always get your online DnD game going, but once its started its easy to just drift away. Face to face DnD is hard to get started, but when it starts its hard to just stop. If you'd like to check out online gaming come to RoE and play!

I actually JUST joined RoE and I don't want to be an RoE , I just want good people to come and game! GAME!!!!
#31

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 0:16:53
wow, it self censors. That was an accident but that's kind of interesting. Censored smilies...
#32

Ornum

Dec 11, 2003 0:19:50
Xanxost, I would love to have your help. And as for moderating, I don't see a problem with you and primemover003 being two of them. I think that a vote should be conducted by the initial interested parties to determine who the mods will be, and I would much rather have it ran by people that are continious contributors to this board people that know what Planescape is all about.
Besides, I wouldn't dream of leaving out your, um......unique perspective on things.
#33

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 0:25:24
I will also throw my hat in the ring, as it were. The dangers of a Slaad on the council with noone to "Balance" (damnable Rilmani) him out would be pure unmitigated chaos. Beside,s this seems like something I could help out with.

Sigil has a calender system, its defined in "Cycles". There is also an Outlands calendar on the Mimir that could be used.
#34

law

Dec 11, 2003 0:32:24
As im still learning about PS. I do know just what I need of it to run a game. Plus it does help that I read the PS part of RoE and here you can get lots of good ideas. Some times you can hint about your games and know one will know. My game over there is about two/three people strong. It looks like ill need to bring in a NPC or two.

So I have only realy ben doing a PS games for 6th mounths (and finding lots of info as well in that time). Since im starting to realy get into the swing now things are going to get fun in my new game ;) .


So in short is that place gets off the ground im willing to be an online DM if need be.
#35

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 0:33:36
I'm no good at DMing, but I like being a player.
#36

Ornum

Dec 11, 2003 0:33:56
Thanks for the info on the calendar, Primus, I'll take a look to get familiar with it. Looks like I'm going into the information gathering stage of the project.
I'll also add your name to the mod candidate list. Glad to have you on board.
#37

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 0:37:56
I still get to play as a Mod correct?
#38

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 0:41:02
Of course, we could always go by the Regulan Tiem keeping system, its quite simple.

You see, each rotation of the main cog is 1 cycle. 17 revolutions is a Great Cycle. A minute is defined by the time it takes for the smaller two cogs, 115 and 4321, to come into alignment 14 times, though a slight adjustment is made every third minute due to interactions with gear 11116. A day is one tick of the main cog modified by the rotation of piston ADFEZ. A week is denoted as....

::4 hours later::

Simple!
#39

Ornum

Dec 11, 2003 0:42:07
Originally posted by Primus, the One and Prime
I still get to play as a Mod correct?

Sure, I don't see why not. I wouldn't want mods to just be there to edit and approve what is and isn't cannon. I would want mods to be acitve participants in the game as well, whether it be as a DM or a player.
#40

korimyr_the_rat

Dec 11, 2003 1:44:19
My current game is mangling canon-- the epic, planar events are a certainty, but I don't think it would be possible or desirable for the events therein to be added to canon.

I'm more or less intimately linking Sigil to the Orion Arm of the Milky Way (Star*Drive), with repercussions including a drastic technological shift in Sigil and an overall modernization of the city and its inhabitants. I'm going to be running the Incursion campaign from Dungeon/Dragon as a part of this, which has far-reaching consequences for the whole multiverse.

On the other hand, I love this idea. I would like to see something along the lines of Living Sigil put in place.
#41

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 1:47:42
Well, the problem with "Living Anything" is that the beauracracy begins to become overbearing and heavy handed. We have to try not to do that if we do attempt this.
#42

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 8:14:47
*throws a rock at the side of Primus's box* If you ever go into that kind of detail again, I'll send a Slaad Lord to eat you.

All of your plans seem to be unfolding nicely, but the question remains: Do you still need the rilmani's webspace? If so, it is readily available.

If you are wanting to use it, let me know ASAP and I'll get a forum established very quickly, give you a collective FTP account, and train you on how to use the forum's administrative controls.

Please try to give me a heads up sometime before this weekend is over so I can get everything ready I'll be going out of town, without internet access from Dec 19 until New Year's Eve, so I'd like to get it at least set up before I leave.
#43

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 11:44:26
Game? I'm all for a game, if you need players. Anyway, all the experenced posters around here need SOMEONE to explain things to.
#44

Ornum

Dec 11, 2003 12:26:51
Yeah, Center of All, go ahead and set up the forum, if you would. I see that there is some interest in the idea. Let us know when you are finished.
#45

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 14:46:06
(hey law, can i get in on your game?)

online gaming works well, as do "living games" i have experience with both, but in a different system (legend of the five rings).

they take a little work, and some more suspension of disbeleif that ususal
#46

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 15:20:31
The old d10 L5R game system, I am guessing? That one was a fun system, very innovative and easy to use. At the same time, it made for very difficult adventures because of how much easier it was to die.

I'll have the FTP account and the board set up hopefully by this evening. If you are a party who is interested in moderating or whatnot, please send me a PM that tells me how to get ahold of you. I use Yahoo, ICQ and AIM.
#47

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 15:29:46
I'm glad that you have the ability to code for a website, the spare time to do it, and that you are also willing to do it. I don't have any problem with you involvement, I openly welcome it, if fact, so I'll reserve the right to discuss this further with you in the future when and if this proposal gets off the ground, if that suits you.

Sure. Drop an email to [email]mrgoat@goat-net.org[/email] when/if you want me to do some work for you. I've seen online rpging projects either be virtually unusable or outright fail because no one was willing/able to do the dirty work, so I figured I'd offer, since I'd definitely enjoy this one.

Oh yeah, I'd like to play too.
#48

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 16:13:12
I know this could pose some issues, but what about setting up like 12 adventures or so a year, and depending on reported results of the majority, the timeline would advance and the results would be posted. This is very similar to RPGA, but without the whole nasty parts of what is and is not allowed and all that fun stuff. That way everyone is playing along in cannon, and there is very little chance for uber snafu's plot wise.

If we had enough people we could even set up adventures in certian areas of the planes, so players could pick where they wanted to be 'stationed' so to speak. Of course then, who wouldn't want to be in Sigil?

Just tossing some ideas around.

-Greyjoy
#49

law

Dec 11, 2003 16:14:01
For all thos that want to play in the game im going to be starting please get a log in at RoE and use the rules. When that bord goes up and that game keeps running I might start another there other wise I will post updates and such.
#50

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 16:29:08
yes the d10 system, called "living rokugan." due to issues wth the rpga, we arent with them anymore.
#51

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 16:29:30
#52

law

Dec 11, 2003 16:37:17
I have a few ideas for the parts of the place.

ok here it comes.

A place to post new stuff (homade and such). (like the womb at RoE)

A place to put new locals and such (look at RoE PS forum and youll see what I mean).

A place for the games to be put up (for other games then the ones that are up).

A place for OOC talk.

A place to run the games.



Thats it for now.
#53

sirjoekcb

Dec 11, 2003 18:08:00
I've been toying around with the idea of setting up a wiki that addresses most of law's points above. In fact I've already started a personal wiki as a convenient place to store local copies of the excellent material that's posted at RoE.

If anyone else is interested, let me know and we can start figuring out how to make it a reality.
#54

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 18:27:41
Forgive me if I'm not up on all of the internet terminology.

Wiki?
#55

Ornum

Dec 11, 2003 18:50:45
Now that the project has advanced to the point that Center of All is establishing a forum, there are a few things that need to be discussed and decided upon in an effort to clear up any and all confusion before we go any further.

First, the exact number of moderators and who those mods will be need to be determined. I was thinking that only 4 or 5 people need to become mods. This way, there are enough to fully discuss submissions as to their validity and balance in our continium and address any problems found, but not too many that nothing truly gets accomplished. I know that Xanxost, Primus, and primemover003 have expressed interest in the mod positions, and I assume that Bob the Efreet would want to be a mod as well since this whole idea was his, but are there any other interested parties? Also, I feel that full mod capabilities be given to Center of All as well. I know that he has previously stated that he might not have the time for an active role in the project, but we would be using his webspace and his perspective could help if any difficulties arise. (Subject to him agreeing to this, of course.) The role of the mod should also be clearly defined, as well.

Second, guidlines must be established for the community after the mods are selected. Everyone who wants to be involved should post their ideas of what is and is not acceptable for use in our community. Things such as whether epic levels should be used, and if so, then what limits should be placed on them, and things of that nature that could possibly disrupt the shared campaign. The mods would then take these suggestions and then come up with our official set of guidelines.

Third, exactly what should be included on the website should also be discussed and decided upon. The forum based campaign has already been touched upon, and the submission of adventure outcomes by users for possible inclusion in campaign cannon has been discussed (and may need to be clarified), but what else needs to be included. Both Adrian Greyjoy and law have posted possible inclusions, but does anything else need to be added? Everyone keep in mind that we are using webspace provided by Center of All, and the amount that he is willing to let us use is purely at his discretion, so we need to pretend that we have very little space to work with when determining what we can and can't include.

Finally, anything else that needs to be clarified or discussed should be brought out into the open. As with all things, I'm sure there are going to be some pitfalls along the way, and the more we square away before going into this at full speed, the easier things will be when all of this gets started. I would also like to state that I can in no way give any official answers. I only offer suggestions to how I feel things should be and anything that I say is not law. When the mods are decided upon, their word will then become law (or chaos, in the case of Xanxost).
#56

sirjoekcb

Dec 11, 2003 18:51:38
Whoops, that's a good point. A wiki is basically a website that anyone can add content to. One of the higher-profile wikis is http://en.wikipedia.org/ which is a project to create a community based encyclopedia.

edit: I just searched for planescape, and found it! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planescape
#57

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 19:02:04
are there any other interested parties?

I'm interested in being a mod. I don't know how much people trust my judgement, but there you have it.
#58

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 19:38:33
Well, we should break the gaming section into two different groups. Freeform and DnD. DnD is actual games with actual Online Dice Rolls, etc... Freeform games are much looser and have not as many rigid rules.

We should have a list of various important NPCs and create a quick write-up of stats or at least levels, for them. Any plans to slay/alter/etc. one of the main NPCs as part of a story should be brought up BEFORE hand.

We should have some main gaming guidelines. "Do not kill the Lady. Do not explain the Lady. etc."

We should also have a system for big updates. Like, "Attention on 4/5/1004 the layer of Pellion drifted onto the Gray Wastes of Hades! Watch out!"
#59

xanxost_the_slaadi_dup

Dec 11, 2003 20:11:53
Hmmm...Xanxost as a moderator, Primus, and Center-of-All. That makes Chaos, Law, and Balance...

...then Primemover and Bob the Efreet would represent the Prime and Inner planes...

Strange how that works out.
#60

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 20:14:10
*smiles warmly* Do you think I'd really allow it to be unbalanced at my domain?
#61

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 20:17:10
Indeed.
#62

zombiegleemax

Dec 11, 2003 20:49:03
All right, the board and the FTP accounts are both established. Please PM me with the appropriate contact information and I can tell you what you need to know to get access.
#63

law

Dec 11, 2003 23:20:21
well I sent you my stuff for the second time Center just so you know.
#64

bob_the_efreet

Dec 12, 2003 6:48:51
Wow, things have been moving along nicely. Yes, I'll accept a position as moderator, to make sure the inner planes get represented. (Or because it was my idea, you know, whatever.)
#65

primemover003

Dec 12, 2003 15:35:40
And all the Variety of the Prime shall be integrated into the campaign as well... Good eye Xanxost.
#66

law

Dec 12, 2003 16:14:30
yes things are starting to move now.

Just so every one knows when we get things ina good order one of us will post a link.
#67

zombiegleemax

Dec 14, 2003 16:26:04
I'm definitly very interested in joining this little outing. I absolutely adore planescape, but I also do not currently have a gaming group (I'm out of the country for a year).
I'm willing to be a mod if we need anymore, and I'd also like to be a player. Like Primemover I also have access to almost all of the planescape stuff (either in pdf or book form). But yeah, I definitly want to get in on this action
And even though my sig suggests otherwise, I'm really not trying to drastically alter anything accepted as canon
#68

law

Dec 15, 2003 19:58:56
For all thos that are in my game at RoE its starting please go over and post. Its kick off time.
#69

zombiegleemax

Dec 16, 2003 4:09:07
I will play in a Living campaign, even though the PC's haven't left the Prime Material yet.
#70

bonemage

Jan 13, 2004 16:42:03
This thread seems to have been forgotten but what is the continued interest in doing some sort of a forum based Planescape Game? Also I wonder what kind of legal rights we have to post maps of Sigil and such... I know to some extent we have creative license when doing something like describing the wards as long as we don't cut and paste them from the Boxed Set(s). But anyway I wouldn't be willing to spearhead but I would certainly join a group of people wanting to work on such a project and moderate/participate in a forum based campaign. I have been involved in many of the sort for just various fantasy and science fiction topics.
#71

zombiegleemax

Jan 13, 2004 16:44:58
:D This thread went unnoticed because preliminary work has already begun.
#72

bonemage

Jan 13, 2004 16:56:07
Where at and based around the forum aspect and/or the multiple groups living campaign idea?
#73

zombiegleemax

Jan 13, 2004 16:58:56
Currently, we're not taking applicants and have not opened for business. THe jist is it is a forum based play area where all events that are deemed acceptable (No killing the Lady, etc.) end up becoming part of one cohesive timeline. If you left Sigil and in your absence someone blows up the Civic Festhall, you'll hear about it when you get back.
#74

bonemage

Jan 13, 2004 23:24:47
Hmm not exactly what I was thinking but interesting neverless, keep me posted and I am sure you will post it here when it's ready to go.
#75

zombiegleemax

Jan 17, 2004 21:29:43
I'm interested, at the very least to see where this is heading precisely.
#76

zombiegleemax

Jan 17, 2004 23:58:57
Originally posted by Bonemage
This thread seems to have been forgotten but what is the continued interest in doing some sort of a forum based Planescape Game? Also I wonder what kind of legal rights we have to post maps of Sigil and such... I know to some extent we have creative license when doing something like describing the wards as long as we don't cut and paste them from the Boxed Set(s). But anyway I wouldn't be willing to spearhead but I would certainly join a group of people wanting to work on such a project and moderate/participate in a forum based campaign. I have been involved in many of the sort for just various fantasy and science fiction topics.

I believe we have license to post our own drawings of planar maps and our own writing on the information provided by Planescape.

However, as you said, we are not allowed to post images copied directly from the books.

If you are still interested in participating, I think we have a few more spots open and some new blood might be refreshing to the development side. Things have been a bit slow over there lately. Send me a PM if you're interested and I will give you the site information.
#77

zombiegleemax

Jan 24, 2004 17:42:14
In some long-forgotten past i laid down a holy oath to never post on the Wizards forums. After 4 years of lurking, the silence is broken. May the Powers forgive me...

Anyway, i would love have a part in something that is bigger than my own humble little setting...

Presently i am DM'ing a group of bashers green to the planes making their first steps in Sigil Dark & Uncaring, where you can't even trust Time itself...
I have been playing PS for about 4 years now, completed 2 campaigns and recently started DM'ing another one, this time with new players, not D&D, just story-driven as PS lends itself excellent for this.

Would love to play in, moderate or just give my own influx of ideas to this project. I have all the books, know the chant and love the Lady with all my heart...
#78

zombiegleemax

Jan 26, 2004 0:05:34
Just be careful not to worship her, then, berk.
*grins* The more the merrier.