Darth Maul Payne

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

kelsen

Feb 11, 2004 10:28:36
Any info about Darth Maul Payne?

There are some interisting quotes signed by him at the City State of Tyr acessory, but no stats neither relevant info. The only thing I know is that he was one of the most powerful defilers who served Kalak and that after the death of his master (Kalak) he disappered. Any thoughts?
#2

Kamelion

Feb 11, 2004 12:43:53
I had always seen him as mega-powerful too but the Complete Gladiator's Handbook says that he was a minor necromancer in Kalak's service (and spells his last name without the "e"). It had the line about him having gone underground since Kalak's death and that he is rumoured to be hunting for Kalak's body. It adds that Tithian has attempted to debunk these rumours.

I am wondering where I got the idea from that he is a high-rank necromancer? Is his rank mentioned somewhere besides CGH? City State of Tyr mentions him under the entry for the guy who owns the wagon works (Rarvin?) and once helped Mal Payne put a war beetle together. It only calls him "Kalak's necromancer" though.

And didn't I read a post the other day where Mal Payne was referred to as a she? (>goes off to search<)

OK, maybe not - can't find it. Ho hum...
#3

jon_oracle_of_athas

Feb 11, 2004 13:24:54
Darth Maul Payne

Dote Mal Payne
#4

Pennarin

Feb 11, 2004 13:27:16
Originally posted by Kelsen
Any info about Darth Maul Payne?

Dote Mal Payn (Gladiator's Handbook)
Dote Mal Payne (City-State of Tyr)

I'm currently working on him as a Faces of Athas entry.
Kamelion, would you care to send me what you imagined of him (anecdotes, catch phrases) or an actual 3e write-up, if you made one?
At this point the more ideas the better... :D

Edit: Damn, Jon, you're fast on the trigger...
#5

nytcrawlr

Feb 11, 2004 14:47:52
Originally posted by Jon, Oracle of Athas
Dote Mal Payne

Don't you already have a writeup of this guy Jon?

Or was that something else you sent me?

I should throw up my writeup of an Athasian version of Darth Maul, hehe.
#6

dawnstealer

Feb 11, 2004 14:50:51
I believe he was related to Vader.

(Payne. You must confront PAYNE.)

Okay, maybe not. I thought it mentioned in City State of Tyr a little more about this guy. I want to say he was 11-12th level, but of course I beefed him up quite a bit.
#7

Kamelion

Feb 11, 2004 15:24:08
Kamelion, would you care to send me what you imagined of him (anecdotes, catch phrases) or an actual 3e write-up, if you made one?

I did a rough draft of him for a trip into the Golden Tower a few weeks back. Lemme see... ah here we are. A partial writeup (no skills or feats I see, dear oh dear) but I'll bounce him your way...
#8

jon_oracle_of_athas

Feb 11, 2004 16:51:20
Don't you already have a writeup of this guy Jon?

No, I went with an NPC of my own design for my campaign: So Kah Nu.
#9

nytcrawlr

Feb 11, 2004 16:57:29
Originally posted by Jon, Oracle of Athas
No, I went with an NPC of my own design for my campaign: So Kah Nu.

Ok maybe I changed the labeling of the doc then, that could be a possibilty.

:shrug:
#10

jon_oracle_of_athas

Feb 11, 2004 17:46:59
My mind could be pulling a trick on me though. Send the doc my way...
#11

flip

Feb 12, 2004 8:20:42
Originally posted by NytCrawlr

Or was that something else you sent me?

DMP is a major thorn in Brax's campaigns. The necromancer has a tenadancy to crop up from time to time. If anyone's got the good writeup on him, it's Brax.
#12

dawnstealer

Feb 12, 2004 10:39:49
Brax is rare in these parts since he moved to CO. I could shoot him an email.
#13

zombiegleemax

Feb 12, 2004 11:44:00
I had him in Bodach, living under the undead rule of Irikos the Kaisharga
#14

nytcrawlr

Feb 12, 2004 14:20:47
Originally posted by Gr8Scott
I had him in Bodach, living under the undead rule of Irikos the Kaisharga

Blasphemy!

No one may writeup Irikos but me! LOL

Actually will probably do that soon, using Xlorep's dragon rules since *cough* athas.org hasn't even touched on them yet, at least to my knowledge.

:D
#15

zombiegleemax

Feb 12, 2004 16:35:13
are you going to make him a champion... cause you know that he was assigned to destroy the same race of creatures as Uyness... right?

yeah i'm being obtuse... but when are things going to become consistent

sure he existed, thats cannon, but he wasn't a champion. All of the champions are listed in the WC

just praying that the few involved in writing new info "keep it real"
#16

nytcrawlr

Feb 12, 2004 16:39:01
Originally posted by kefka
are you going to make him a champion... cause you know that he was assigned to destroy the same race of creatures as Uyness... right?

yeah i'm being obtuse... but when are things going to become consistent

sure he existed, thats cannon, but he wasn't a champion. All of the champions are listed in the WC

just praying that the few involved in writing new info "keep it real"

I've got an article coming up that will show my side of things and those that want to use it as canon in their campaigns can.

Don't worry, I will make sure I cover everything, or damn well try.

;)
#17

jihun-nish

Feb 12, 2004 18:33:02
Originally posted by kefka
are you going to make him a champion... cause you know that he was assigned to destroy the same race of creatures as Uyness... right?

you might be right on this......


yeah i'm being obtuse... but when are things going to become consistent

so what


sure he existed, thats cannon, but he wasn't a champion. All of the champions are listed in the WC

not true: the champion named in WC are the remaining ones, not the only ones that were. (some of them were killed, fled--why should Oronis be the only one to have redeemed--, or simply vanished from the face of Athas.)

just praying that the few involved in writing new info "keep it real"

I'll second that statement.
#18

nytcrawlr

Feb 12, 2004 18:43:00
Originally posted by kefka
just praying that the few involved in writing new info "keep it real"

Please keep in mind that just because I write something, doesn't mean it automatically becomes official.

There is a process involved in something becoming official, and I'm sure me writing up Irikos, as a champion, will fail said process miserably. ;)

Also note that crimsonsun.org is *my* website and is not neccessarily affiliated with athas.org. Just because alot of things on there have or will become official doesn't mean everything up there will.



Just FYI.
#19

Pennarin

Feb 12, 2004 19:15:51
Originally posted by NytCrawlr
Please keep in mind that just because I write something, doesn't mean it automatically becomes official.

Ok everyone, so from now its official that we have to keep in mind that just because Nyt writes something, doesn't mean it automatically becomes official.

Everyone wrote that down?!
#20

nytcrawlr

Feb 12, 2004 19:32:25
Originally posted by Pennarin
Ok everyone, so from now its official that we have to keep in mind that just because Nyt writes something, doesn't mean it automatically becomes official.

Everyone wrote that down?!

LOL You hush. :P

Just trying to make sure there isn't any confusion in that department, it seemed to be with Jihun's and Kefka's post.

I could be wrong, but it is covered now regardless.

:D
#21

jon_oracle_of_athas

Feb 13, 2004 7:31:07
Ok everyone, so from now its official that we have to keep in mind that just because Nyt writes something, doesn't mean it automatically becomes official.

Actually, Nyte does not have authority to make official statements on behalf of athas.org. This is an official statement that the unofficial statement regarding officiality(unofficiality) of content Nyt produces conforms with official policy. Gotta love the templarate! :D
#22

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 9:02:44
i understand that what nyt writes is not law... he isn't the president, but he works with the president

"not true: the champion named in WC are the remaining ones, not the only ones that were. (some of them were killed, fled--why should Oronis be the only one to have redeemed--, or simply vanished from the face of Athas.)"
-Jihun the Rhul

actually WC does say "All of them are mentioned below" J. Why would you want to make more?

Tecs dead... it mentions him
Kalid-Ma... Goner... it mentions him
Inenek(?) and Pennarin(?)... dosent mention them... but oronis and daskinor arn't named in RaFoaDK (confusion)

And this just puts me right back on the Irikos thing
#23

Pennarin

Feb 13, 2004 10:14:59
kefka, you're taking it too much by the letter

Daskinor and Oronis are not mentionned in RaFoaDK because the author had not neen made aware by the gaming department of their future presence in the new boxed set....

Same for Irikos: the entry from the Book of Artifacts, a non-DS product, was consistently ignored or forgotten by the game designers...

Inenek is just another name for one of the existing champions: we can assume many have alternative names and actual birth names that are not their champion names...

The absence of Pennarin from the list is because the new Boxed Set did not draw from the novel RaFoaDK. Another failing of communication between gaming and writing depatments...

"All of them are mentioned below", yet Irikos is official, so there goes that statement, neh!?...

A couple of the champions listed are replacements for earlier versions that had been killed, not all of it is mentionned...

Troy Denning once said there were other champions he never mentionned. Perhaps farther north, south and east beyond the silt sea, we'll find them...
#24

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 10:37:24
hey pen... be nice

if people want to throw around text and quotes and such...

tell me where it says that there are more champions and where does it say that irikos was a champ (right hand = champ?)

o righteous one have mercy, you talk out of both mouths

perhaps I am confusing you by using Champion and Monarch interchangibly

Iriikos was a champ who was also assigned to kill the same race as Unyss (I am guessing because she was fairly incompitent), it is said that Rajaat made tons of champions... just be clear that only the ones that lived through the battle with Rajaat became (what I was refering to as champs but meant monarch) linked with the lens by Borys

so neh!? back
#25

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 10:42:54
btw pen...Troy also wrote that the far side of the sea had never been traversed... but some people swear that is where borys's city is... hmmmm?

neh?!
#26

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 12:06:38
The Champions are a story building/plot device. If you need a few more of them in order to tell your story (i.e. have a great campaign), by all means take the statement that these 13 Champions are all that are left and toss it out the window. In the original box we only knew of 9 Champions and thought there weren't any others. Now were up to 13. What's a few more really going to hurt?
#27

Pennarin

Feb 13, 2004 13:42:05
Ok.
First of all this very post I'm writing is not a put down or whatever the english expression is for that.
I was sincerly surprised that you perceived my post that way, kefka. Serious.
I thought I had made myself informative. As in "Spock-like".
Well it seems not just the klingons did find Spock insulting afterall... (and thats a joke, just in case!)

Originally posted by kefka
so neh!? back

That "neh!? " expression I wrote? Its intention was not insulting in the least. See I'm french-speaking and what I wanted to write was the expression "hein!?". I should have put out a ;) instead...
Thats language barriers for you ;)

Originally posted by kefka
where does it say that irikos was a champ (right hand = champ?)

The concepts of SKs and Champions are pretty interchangeable, since most if not all among the first belong to that last category.
You already know that.
I'm saying that because, when the entry for Irikos was written, there were no champions others than the SKs (it was during the Prism Pentad). The people who wrote that section on Irikos knew that also. The only big badies during the cleansing wars were the badies Troy developped in the novels. So I presume that Irikos, written at the same time, was one of those badies.

Originally posted by kefka
o righteous one have mercy, you talk out of both mouths

I'll leave you that one.

Originally posted by kefka
tell me where it says that there are more champions

This is not in any official document.
If I like the aliens Xeelee created by Stephen Baxter and the author in an email or a SF convention tells me or a whole bunch of people that yes!, the mysterious Xeelee are in fact humanoids, even though its not written anywhere, well I'm going to believe it.
Wouldn't you??

Homebrew Dark Sun cosmologie, by me:
God :D-> Denning & Abbey -> TSR staff -> fans
True with most fans I met, explaining why they are ready to ignore some of the things written in the accessories for what's in the novels.

Originally posted by kefka
Iriikos was a champ who was also assigned to kill the same race as Unyss (I am guessing because she was fairly incompitent)

I would say that's from TSR staff writers incompetence. ;)
#28

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 14:21:49
quote:

"All of them are mentioned below", yet Irikos is official, so there goes that statement, neh!?...

-- the question i am asking is "officially what" where does it say he's a champ? And in order to include him (because look at how two mentions of another champion have us quibbling over the details) i pose the question "what is a champion?"

sorry pen, i took Neh?! as a Monty Python "knights who say neh" reference, so i just said neh back

neh?!

lynn abbey wrote that kalak wasn't a champion, that sacha and wyan granted spells to his templars for him...lynn must be a like me to come up with that type of idea... or is troy wrong and kalak wasn't a champ?
#29

Pennarin

Feb 13, 2004 15:01:06
And in order to include him [...] i pose the question "what is a champion?"

Pfouu...
-take hat off and scratch head-

Champion:
1- Generals during the Cleansing Wars
2- Those that have been ordained by Rajaat to annihilate a race
3- People with the Champion template

The first two definitions do not put the same people in the champion category as the third one.
I would say a Champion is anyone who fought in the Cleansing Wars, at the head of an army, and who received from Rajaat the title of Champion of Rajaat, preceded by a number, and a slap on the buttom with a go for annihilation.
I believe not all who received the title fell in the third category.

sorry pen, i took Neh?! as a Monty Python "knights who say neh" reference, so i just said neh back

That's not alright, kefka, me and my knights will be appeased only if you bring us a schrubbery! :D

lynn abbey wrote that kalak wasn't a champion, that sacha and wyan granted spells to his templars for him...lynn must be a like me to come up with that type of idea... or is troy wrong and kalak wasn't a champ?

Umm...you take us right back into the crux of an old discussion, kefka.
Go read this thread if you want to read some opinions.

The boards community is divided in two concerning the championhood of Kalak, as you can see in reading the thread.
I stand my ground in believing that Kalak could have received the title of Champion without having the template, and that Irikos probably had the Champion template since I wouldn't see Rajaat intrusting the Silencer to anyone else.
#30

Kamelion

Feb 13, 2004 15:05:15
The write-up on the Scorcher in the 2e Psionic Artifacts of Athas states that Rajaat made three swords (Silencer, Scourge and Scorcher) for his "most favoured champions" and lists these as Borys, Myron and Irikos. Myron and Irikos are named as his "right-hand" and "left-hand". 2e Book of Artifacts states that it was Irikos' ancient duty to destroy the race of orcs and implies that he was the one that did this.

(Edit to fix stupid mistakes )
#31

nytcrawlr

Feb 13, 2004 15:28:13
Originally posted by kefka
where does it say that irikos was a champ (right hand = champ?)

PAoA in the Scorcher entry.

It also calls many of the champions "warlord" in said entry.



My article coming up will tie the whole thing together. ;)

Be patient.
#32

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 16:37:52
yup... i saw that post

and i am siding with flip cuz he's da firestarter

irikos was a puppet
#33

nytcrawlr

Feb 13, 2004 16:42:38
Originally posted by kefka
yup... i saw that post

and i am siding with flip cuz he's da firestarter

irikos was a puppet

Bah, flip is ignorant, history was manipulated I say!



Pretty sure he believes Braveheart was a true story too. :D

/me runs
#34

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 16:45:11
umm... yeah... nyt... I've seen william wallaces crypt...

please say you were kidding
#35

nytcrawlr

Feb 13, 2004 16:50:48
I was kidding overall, yes.

Braveheart, while based on a true story, was horribly inaccurate.

I meant flip believed it anyway, not me.
#36

Pennarin

Feb 13, 2004 17:15:16
Originally posted by NytCrawlr
Bah, flip is ignorant, history was manipulated I say!

Actually I've got it on good account that flip is only a front to Jon, an avatar to bounce ideas off.
Seriously. Scout's honor.

-me scurrying away after seeding chaos and dissention -
#37

zombiegleemax

Feb 13, 2004 20:40:42
I believe not all who received the title fell in the third category.

I like the idea, but it has some flaws. The highest ranking generals of each genocidal army would almost have to be of the 'Champion' template for the simple sake of immortality. The war was a few thousand years long. No army is going to stay cohesive for that kind of duration if its leaders are constantly being replaced every few dozen years. Hence, both 2 and 3 on your list would almost always be the same.
#38

Pennarin

Feb 13, 2004 22:10:27
Someone like Kalak, with his 25/25 levels in 2e, would be the kind of mortal that could cut himself a piece of the cake that was the wars, and consistently mentain his position through some form of rejuvination (9th level spell, simple) to keep going for the couple of centuries necessary to wage war over a numerous people disperssed over a large territory.

I don't know what levels he should have in 3e, probably more of Wiz and less of Psi, but still epic and kick ass.

Kalak IMHO never become immortal, but stayed a mortal man, rejuvenating periodically, since before the cleansing wars.
I really can't believe Kalak was nothing other than the old man he appears to be, from those colorful descriptions by Tithian, as opposed to same descriptions of Nibenay, obviously wrapped down to his heels in glamours.

Make him Wiz 30/Psi(telepath)20. He's older than most living SKs after all...
#39

nytcrawlr

Feb 13, 2004 23:06:18
When I wrote my article of Kalak vs. Irikos I took that into consideration and described it as an immortal spell or something similar that he found out about once he was already old and used that to make it to where he didn't age after that.

Hence, he still looks old and has an old body, but hasn't aged anymore since the casting of that spell.

Don't need the champion template for that, heh.
#40

Pennarin

Feb 13, 2004 23:17:53
I quite agree on the concept, if not the detail.

I figure there's two ways of keeping livin' a loonnggg time:
- you find a process to make yourself immortal, like Dregoth did, and used later on his templar (it may or may not bring the person back to middle age, since City by the Silt Sea wasen't too specific)
- you're powerful enough to cast 8th or 9th-level spells and have the kind of lifestyle and personnal power that allows you to periodically spend 3000XP (Protection from Time) or drain dangerously powerful individuals you'd have to subdue (Vampiric Youthfulness)
#41

flip

Feb 16, 2004 8:33:24
Originally posted by Pennarin
Actually I've got it on good account that flip is only a front to Jon, an avatar to bounce ideas off.
Seriously. Scout's honor.

-me scurrying away after seeding chaos and dissention -



I realize that I'm only managing to log on to the boards once a week these days (busy busy busy at work) ... but.

Come-on.

Everyone should know that Jon is an avatar of me. I've been around longer. :D
#42

flip

Feb 16, 2004 8:34:40
Originally posted by NytCrawlr
Bah, flip is ignorant, history was manipulated I say!

... Right.

/me pats nyt on the head.

It doesn't count as falling victim to historical manipulation when I'm the one doing the manipulating. Next!
#43

nytcrawlr

Feb 16, 2004 15:06:24
Originally posted by flip
... Right.

/me pats nyt on the head.

It doesn't count as falling victim to historical manipulation when I'm the one doing the manipulating. Next!

Where's my cookie?

I want my cookie dammit!

:D
#44

zombiegleemax

Feb 16, 2004 16:02:42
Hence, he still looks old and has an old body, but hasn't aged anymore since the casting of that spell.

While I don't recall there ever actually being a specific spell for it, I'm sure that if you've got the mojo to sling out a couple of 'extend your life a few hundred generations', you've probably also a means to remake your self to look like a Nubian god. Kalak's physical appearance was likely more a matter of either preference or indifference. Kalak was nuts, but still not stupid (kinda like Dregoth in that regard). His form as a frail old man was probably adopted for its psychological benefit. You appear weak and frail to lure your enemies into under estimating you. Those in the know, however, see the frailty mixed with massive power and are in far more awe from the contradiction than they would have been if you 'appeared' powerful. Serves a dual purpose for both enemies and allies. 'Course, this assumes that Kalak really cared about it and made it a conscious decision. He may very well have considered his appearance and the upkeep of such to be beneath him. 'Pretty is for the petty and only the weak are fooled by deceptive appearances' could also have been his moto.
#45

nytcrawlr

Feb 16, 2004 16:22:08
Originally posted by Mach2.5
While I don't recall there ever actually being a specific spell for it, I'm sure that if you've got the mojo to sling out a couple of 'extend your life a few hundred generations', you've probably also a means to remake your self to look like a Nubian god. Kalak's physical appearance was likely more a matter of either preference or indifference. Kalak was nuts, but still not stupid (kinda like Dregoth in that regard). [snip]

Understandable, I was just trying to find a reason to explain why he still looked old but yet was immortal.
#46

zombiegleemax

Feb 16, 2004 16:34:14
Umm, you snipped the part where I gave two explanations Not they they're that great or anything. Just trying a different logic angle.
#47

nytcrawlr

Feb 16, 2004 16:44:23
Originally posted by Mach2.5
Umm, you snipped the part where I gave two explanations Not they they're that great or anything. Just trying a different logic angle.

Yeah, didn't quite understand the reasoning you gave for such if there was one, sorry.

Just trying to explain why he looked old but yet was immortal.

I assume yours was saying that he was immortal but had a spell going to make him look old for obvious reasons.

/me shrugs
#48

zombiegleemax

Feb 17, 2004 9:06:50
ok guys think about highlander ( best immortal material out there )

you stop aging when you become immortal ( or as in the show, when you learn you are immortal )

so if rajaat didn't make kalak immortal until he was, well, he looks to be about three hundred, that is how he would appear ( but this apearance was glamour anyway because he would have had scales and, um dragon parts...?)

/cringing awaiting slap
#49

zombiegleemax

Feb 17, 2004 20:50:55
Umm, sorry to disappoint you Kefka, but I don't think that pointing out the painfully obvious to us in our moment of short-sightedness deserves any kind of biatch slapping at all. In fact, thanks. You just proved the point that I was failing at making: that Kalak chose how he appeared as a human. I think we all were forgetting that Kalak's true form (and the point of discussion) was that of a half dragon half man.
#50

zombiegleemax

Feb 17, 2004 21:13:05
oh my god, oh my god... did i finally say something worth listening to...

can i have a cookie... pleeeaaase?
#51

nytcrawlr

Feb 17, 2004 21:17:47
No but you can have a sword up your....er nevermind.


:fight!:
#52

zombiegleemax

Feb 17, 2004 21:18:16
oh yeah... and sorry... i didn't know was a taboo word... in the slappy sense...

/cast finger of death on nyt
#53

nytcrawlr

Feb 17, 2004 21:19:43
kinda like ewe is taboo too?

/me runs
#54

zombiegleemax

Feb 17, 2004 21:56:04
for Kefka.

And Nyte's just mad cause he forgot about it too, but that's okay. We still :inlove: him, even if he's and sometimes throws a when we don't give him the that he thinks he deserves when he's on or playing at being of the world. You just gotta take the with the sometimes.
#55

nytcrawlr

Feb 17, 2004 22:06:27







"I'm king of the world!"

"You're a looney."

Actually I could care less if it was an illusion or not, I just like the idea that he was old when he gained immortality, hence locking said frail body into the state of what it was in.

Didn't mean he couldn't kick a little butt because of said frail body. :D

Dragon magic is a powerful thing baybee.
#56

nytcrawlr

Feb 18, 2004 4:49:06
Originally posted by Jon, Oracle of Athas
No, I went with an NPC of my own design for my campaign: So Kah Nu.

Actualy I was refering to Daar Eht Payne, but I think that guy was for your FR campaign, so nevermind, heh.