Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1scoti_garbidisJun 02, 2004 17:23:18 | I would like to use Blipdoolpoolp in one of my campaigns. I am slowly picking up the older Greyhawk materials but cannot afford to buy them all. Other than the generic info provided on the Living Greyhawk page, is there anywhere else i can find some more extensive info on Blipdoolpoolp online. Thanks for all your help. :D |
#2MortepierreJun 03, 2004 2:25:24 | Here, and it will only cost you $4.95 |
#3ElendurJun 03, 2004 10:32:55 | Damn you, another 5 bucks lost to RPGnow. It's just too easy. 3 clicks and another PDF added to my hoard. Posting commercial links is against the CoC by the way, I think to protect me from spending all my money as I'm reading the boards. |
#4max_writerJun 03, 2004 11:25:07 | Blibdoolpoolp? ... What are you up to? Sincerely, Falstaff Company of the Copper Card |
#5zombiegleemaxJun 03, 2004 11:29:33 | Originally posted by Elendur Not when WoTC makes a profit on it, which they do from svgames and rpgnow. |
#6MortepierreJun 03, 2004 12:04:35 | Originally posted by Elendur Muahahahaha! |
#7ElendurJun 03, 2004 13:39:00 | Originally posted by abysslin Interestingly the CoC makes no such distinction, though it must be implied, since then they wouldn't be able to link to their own site. So having a link to a Malhavok pdf hosted on rpgnow would be in violation of the CoC, but a link to the same site pointed to a WotC pdf wouldn't? Interesting. Here's the link to the CoC: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=community/coc Although of course I'm technically violating the CoC by linking to it Greyhawk pdf's rock! |
#8zombiegleemaxJun 03, 2004 14:42:39 | You must've been the victim of a j-walking ticket at one point in time! ;) |
#9zombiegleemaxJun 03, 2004 15:34:45 | It ain't like you're posting on the Forgotten Realms Message Board. The WizO's lock just about every thread over there, the poor bastards. Unless Faraer rats you out don't worry about it. CoC be damned. |
#10cwslyclghJun 03, 2004 15:53:31 | Interestingly the CoC makes no such distinction, though it must be implied, since then they wouldn't be able to link to their own site. actually it is not a CoC violation to link to sites that don't sell stuff (or are not porn sites etc.) since WotC no longer sells anything on thier site, and since they do not pedal porn etc. linkng to their site isn't a CoC violation. |
#11scoti_garbidisJun 03, 2004 15:59:40 | Originally posted by Max_Writer You always have to watch out when your players might be reading the same threads you ask questions in. But no big deal because he also DMs a game I play. Guess I will just have to keep my eyes peeled. What do you think about that Max Writer? |
#12zombiegleemaxJun 03, 2004 16:02:50 | Originally posted by Valkaun_Dain What has Worse odds: 1. Smarty Jones at the Belmont (currently 2:5) or 2. That Valkaun_Dain Plays Chaotic characters? Just thinking aloud. |
#13zombiegleemaxJun 04, 2004 9:53:17 | You hit the nail on the head. I almost added to my post before I sent it: "I'd like to think of myself as Chaotic Good." And what do you know, the thread I started re: Dragon and Dungeon Magazines was locked because it wasn't specific to Greyhawk. I guess I should have said: "This ad I saw in the recent Dragon (you know, the magazine that occasionally has Greyhawk content in it) said that..." BTW, I'm currently playing a Neutral Good Sentinel (Paladin variant from DRAGON MAGAZINE) who hails from the County of Urnst so I'm not a one trick pony. I've been trying to keep the group in line and it ain't easy. |
#14zombiegleemaxJun 08, 2004 18:57:23 | I've been trying to keep the group in line and it ain't easy. You could use a pincer staff... :D |