Champion Role Call

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

zombiegleemax

Jul 28, 2004 13:22:29
Could someone please list all the Champions for me, as I am not so smart and loose track easily.

What cities do they live in? What about those two clowns north of Draj? Who was succesful? Do have a favorite?

Thank you to anyone who takes the time to post.
#2

Pennarin

Jul 28, 2004 13:44:39
Go to Board member Grummore's page, The Silt Skimmer, and check out the document he created called The 15 champions of Rajaat.
#3

dawnstealer

Jul 28, 2004 14:15:34
And the Wayans brothers. Don't forget them.
#4

nytcrawlr

Jul 28, 2004 14:34:50
Official List of Champions

As far as my fave? Probably Dregoth.
#5

zombiegleemax

Jul 28, 2004 16:28:14
First would definately be the only SK to define Athasian Big Pimpin: Nibenay. The city of Nibenay was a common starting point for most campaigns (bleh to Tyr) and I grew to love utilizing the Shadow King's efficient manipulations of his city (never could talk anyone into playing a templar of Nibenay though, would have been a great RPing opprotunity). After that would come one of the two nothern 'clowns', Draskinor. I've only taken one party to the city of Eldaarich, and I highly doubt that they will ever forget their trip. None of them ever felt quite sane themselves after they finally made it out of there; even years later they would still be on a paranaoid lookout for some sign of Draskinor seeking retribution or vengence on them.

Oh yeah, what exactly do you mean by "Who was successfull?"
#6

zombiegleemax

Jul 29, 2004 3:43:46
Pff you forget about the amazing Shadow Mage Ka'tor that rules Tyr now, all the other sorcerer kings tremble in fear.
#7

zombiegleemax

Jul 29, 2004 6:43:49
I like them all, I have a respect, for totalatarian, dictators, the only thing better, is an emperial dictator. Rule your people with an iron Fist. So I vote, Ivan the terrible third czar of all russia. Um, I know its cleche, seein he has his own book and all, but Ill go with Hamanu. (Help, I forgot ....Urik, sorry, been reading to much shadowrun, and not enuff, DS)
#8

Sysane

Jul 29, 2004 7:49:23
I'm a fan of Nibnay/Gallard myself. He has interacted with my old party on many occasions. He's helped at time and double crossed them later. It was sort of a love hate relationship.

One of this templars travelled with the party for the longest time but she later switched to become a templar of Oronis.
#9

xlorepdarkhelm_dup

Jul 29, 2004 11:45:11
Originally posted by NytCrawlr
Official List of Champions

As far as my fave? Probably Dregoth.

Heh, same here.
#10

zombiegleemax

Jul 29, 2004 14:17:51
Mach 2.5 that was good, the Shadow King does indeed define SK Big pimping...

My problem, is that I actually haven't played an actual game of DS since I was like 13 or 14 and that was back when the game was invented. Now all these later, I have read the books (almost all the books) and would love to DM a campaign. Unfortunatly, my old AD&D posse is all grown up

I must say, right now I like Hamanu b/c of the book. It is the only king that I have delved into or Kalak or the Shadow King. They have the most stuff written about them. I found the Balic King to be a bit of a clown and well.

By succesful, I meant, did they all dominate their Cleansing Battles? Well except for Aleron (sp) Boris and Dregoth.

Will they ever write anymore DS novels? I sometimes read the fan fiction on the net, but it isn't the same. I read a couple good ones. One was about this crazy Defiler who hunts a dragon and the other was about a Caravan capt. Good stuff... sorry I ramble...

Thanks for the comments.
#11

zombiegleemax

Jul 29, 2004 14:44:39
Silt Skimmer's list is pretty good.

i see Hamanu aced a couple Champions. Does anyone know the story of why he killed Kalid-Ma? and Seilba?

And Abalch-Re killed Dregoth? Did she trick him? I thought Dregoth was one of the more powerful SKs like Boris, Hamanu or Gallard?

I remember earlier on another thread people were saying its a shame there are so few SKs in the game now. I must agree, the SKs are what made Dark Sun and now so many are dead.
#12

zombiegleemax

Jul 29, 2004 16:47:13
And Abalch-Re killed Dregoth? Did she trick him? I thought Dregoth was one of the more powerful SKs like Boris, Hamanu or Gallard?

It was a combined effort on the part of most if not all of the SKs, but Abalach-Re was said to have been the 'leader' in this single instance. Its not always a matter of levels or D&D based statistics. Technically, Dergoth could wipe the floor with The Hoe Queen without breaking much of a sweat. Perhaps it was trickery, deceit, or cunning rather than raw power. I don't have any books with me, so perhaps there is something in canon that supports, contradicts, or details this a little better.

I remember earlier on another thread people were saying its a shame there are so few SKs in the game now. I must agree, the SKs are what made Dark Sun and now so many are dead.

Its a two sided coin. On one hand, its a case of nostalgia of the original, lightly detailed DS box set and all its flavorful yummie-ness. But it was pretty static in that regard. "Oh, its another city, ruled by yet another SK. He's another diabolical tyrant, just like the last five we've come across, right?" I would hear this, or something similar to it more times than I would care to remember. Even though the individual cities were nicely detailed and unique in culture, they were still all pretty much the same. There wasn't alot of overall variety, which didn't really seem so bad at the time, but in hindsight, it was very limiting (in coming up with creative adventures). Its certainly no shame to me without the few SKs who died since its opened up avenues of adventures that I probably wouldn't have been able to come up with before. And I've yet to hear a newly introduced DS player have the same problems keeping track of the city-states or their respective rulers, they're different enough from one another in general. While I can't say I like how each of them has turned out, they still work out quite well at the game table, where it counts the most.
#13

dawnstealer

Jul 29, 2004 17:45:38
In my opinion, the GMs who have PCs that regularly meet, or butt heads with, the SKs are doing something wrong. The SKs should have their own personalities, but those personalities should be ingrained and reflected in their cities. They should be mysterious, dangerous, and frighteningly powerful. After 4-6,000 years, their interest in mortals is very small, and they would not likely "come down to that level" to talk to a few rebellious "adventurers." If the players hit 20th level or so, sure, they might get an audience. Before then, they simply are not important enough to worry about.
#14

zombiegleemax

Jul 30, 2004 7:26:53
It is a shame that freedom rang in 2nd ed revised. Thats why I went back to the first box set, And incorparated the other stuff.... I swear though, I still want the achillies look, and fighting style and I want to be sent to athas when I die... PLEASE GOD, PLEASE!!!


YOu know what when/if I ever conquer africa, we should turn the sahara into our own athas
#15

Sysane

Jul 30, 2004 7:43:18
And Abalch-Re killed Dregoth?

Its beleived that she orchestrated the betrayal of Dregoth and rounded up the other SK's to help.

In Dregoth's final moments Re dug her claws into his throat saying "you've become to powerful for OUR own good" or something along those lines. Basically gloating to the Dread King just before he died.

Just part of the reason why Dregoth hold a grudge against her.
#16

Sysane

Jul 30, 2004 8:01:52
In my opinion, the GMs who have PCs that regularly meet, or butt heads with, the SKs are doing something wrong. The SKs should have their own personalities, but those personalities should be ingrained and reflected in their cities. They should be mysterious, dangerous, and frighteningly powerful. After 4-6,000 years, their interest in mortals is very small, and they would not likely "come down to that level" to talk to a few rebellious "adventurers." If the players hit 20th level or so, sure, they might get an audience. Before then, they simply are not important enough to worry about.

I only partly agree with this. I don't feel that a SK should be inviting the characters to brunch every Sunday, but would meet them once or twice especially if the party brings attention to themselves.

As I stated before, my party didn't start interacting with Nibnay on a sort of regular basis untill the events from Marauders Nibnay Adventure played out. A short time later the Shadow King summoned the characters. Charging them with the task of going to the northern lands to find allies in the war against Dregoth.

SKs used in a similar way is expectable IMO, but I feel that they would never be "chummy" with the party (except for maybe Oronis).
#17

zombiegleemax

Jul 30, 2004 8:37:22
Originally posted by Dragi
i see Hamanu aced a couple Champions. Does anyone know the story of why he killed Kalid-Ma? and Seilba?


The books only say that Sielba mustered her army and attacked Urik. Hamanu slaughtered her army, killed her himself and razed the town to the ground. With those riches, he bribed Borys (because the dragon would have one less city to draw slaves from), and Borys used the wealth to build Ur-Draxa.

Kalid-Ma was about to transform into a full-blown dragon in one strike (that's where Kalak got the idea), and when Kalak's spies noticed that, Kalak warned Borys, and together with Hamanu they went down to Kalidnay to kill Kalid-Ma.
#18

zombiegleemax

Jul 30, 2004 9:14:18
Originally posted by columbob
The books only say that Sielba mustered her army and attacked Urik. Hamanu slaughtered her army, killed her himself and razed the town to the ground. With those riches, he bribed Borys (because the dragon would have one less city to draw slaves from), and Borys used the wealth to build Ur-Draxa.

In Black Flames it says Sielba and the Merchant houses of Yaramuke were going to ruin Urik with high prices and trade embargoes so they could gain control of the obsidian mines in the Smoking Crown.

Kalid-Ma was about to transform into a full-blown dragon in one strike (that's where Kalak got the idea), and when Kalak's spies noticed that, Kalak warned Borys, and together with Hamanu they went down to Kalidnay to kill Kalid-Ma.

I've seen that one, too, but can't pin it down...where did you read it, columbob?
#19

zombiegleemax

Jul 30, 2004 12:49:08
In my opinion, the GMs who have PCs that regularly meet, or butt heads with, the SKs are doing something wrong

Haha, don't take me so literaly. With the exception of Draskinor (who's paranoia of outsiders in his city, in my eyes, perfectly justifies him taking more direct interest in any group of PCs wandering about his city), few parties I've run have ever actually met a champion, and none have ever actually challenged one of the SKs directly. But the PCs regularly found themselves caught up in the many plots and plans of the SKs. Even then, they were rarely in a position to actually thwart those plans if they had wanted to; woe to them should they have actually tried to.
#20

Sysane

Jul 30, 2004 13:09:42
few parties I've run have ever actually met a champion, and none have ever actually challenged one of the SKs directly.

Closest the party has come to fighting SK was when the PC's in my old 2e campaign were thrown back in time at the begining of the Cleansing Wars. They tried to stop Dregoth (a then low level dragon) from slaying Taraskir. They barely scratched him before he threw a "time stop" which allowed him ample time to finish of the Lion King.
#21

zombiegleemax

Jul 30, 2004 14:01:06
Originally posted by Ablamar
[b]In Black Flames it says Sielba and the Merchant houses of Yaramuke were going to ruin Urik with high prices and trade embargoes so they could gain control of the obsidian mines in the Smoking Crown.



I've seen that one, too, but can't pin it down...where did you read it, columbob?

I think that's in the Official DS timeline, which is available on a few DS web sites.
#22

xlorepdarkhelm_dup

Jul 30, 2004 14:11:26
Originally posted by Dawnstealer
In my opinion, the GMs who have PCs that regularly meet, or butt heads with, the SKs are doing something wrong. The SKs should have their own personalities, but those personalities should be ingrained and reflected in their cities. They should be mysterious, dangerous, and frighteningly powerful. After 4-6,000 years, their interest in mortals is very small, and they would not likely "come down to that level" to talk to a few rebellious "adventurers." If the players hit 20th level or so, sure, they might get an audience. Before then, they simply are not important enough to worry about.

I have 2 exceptions to this rule:

1. a group of Adventurers under the employ of a Sorcerer-King, could potentially meet that Sorcerer-King a bit more frequently than those that don't. I do love to run those "evil" campaigns that so few DM's seem to like...

2. It's a great way to wipe the slate clean, and start over with a fresh adventuring group. Especially since, basically, adventuring parties end up very dead when they encounter any of the remaining Sorcerer-Kings and try to butt heads.
#23

Sysane

Jul 30, 2004 14:24:07
a group of Adventurers under the employ of a Sorcerer-King, could potentially meet that Sorcerer-King a bit more frequently than those that don't. I do love to run those "evil" campaigns that so few DM's seem to like...

Which I pretty much did with Nibnay in my campaign but the character weren't evil. Hows the saying go "The enemy of my enemy is my ally"?
#24

dawnstealer

Jul 30, 2004 18:00:00
Actually, I guess I should amend my earlier statement. My players helped in the "slaying" of Kalak (only to later find out that they had just triggered a contingency spell and he came back - go fig). They got cocky, though (they always do), and tried to do the same to Hamanu.

Baaaaaaaaaad idea.