Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 zombiegleemax Sep 02, 2004 14:26:52	Hi The Shadow Dragon Frightful Presence progression (AoM p. 214) seems a bit skewiff. Am I right in thinking the progression should be 23, 24, 26, 29, 32, 34, 37, 39? Thanks Simon Collins
#2 brimstone Sep 02, 2004 14:34:52	Hi The Shadow Dragon Frightful Presence progression (AoM p. 214) seems a bit skewiff. Am I right in thinking the progression should be 23, 24, 26, 29, 32, 34, 37, 39? Just follow what's in the Draconomicon. Some of the numbers in the AoM for the Shadow Dragon were off a bit. (typos, I'd assume)
#3 cam_banks Sep 02, 2004 14:37:59	Just follow what's in the Draconomicon. Some of the numbers in the AoM for the Shadow Dragon were off a bit. (typos, I'd assume) Right. Believe it or not, AoM was the first product to have a 3.5 version of the shadow dragon, and at the time we didn't have the absolute, complete, 100% finalized version of the 3.5 rules. But yeah, that's got nothing to do with the fact that those should be 2s and not 3s. Cheers, Cam
#4 brimstone Sep 02, 2004 14:47:59	Right. Believe it or not, AoM was the first product to have a 3.5 version of the shadow dragon, and at the time we didn't have the absolute, complete, 100% finalized version of the 3.5 rules. But yeah, that's got nothing to do with the fact that those should be 2s and not 3s. Beyond that...I think it was pretty close. I'd have to check my errata at home (I don't have it here) because I compared the two. There may have been one other difference, but I can't remember what it was...
#5 zombiegleemax Sep 02, 2004 16:29:49	Uh... I have to admit I don't own the Draconomicon :embarrass So, can someone tell me if its purely a case of swapping the 3's for 2's or should the numbers be different? Thanks Simon Collins