The Knights, Nekara VS Solminics?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

zombiegleemax

Jan 08, 2005 13:17:25
Ok, I myself was befuddled that the political map in the core book, shows that Palanthas, and the western cost of the Plains of Solamnia are in the control of the Knights of Nekara, when the Knighthood was spread pretty thin during the Age of Mortals, battleing the dragon purge and other things. Palanthas belongs to Solamnia, and always should be, thus I have turned the western cities and Palanthas back over to Solamina (Who took advantage of the situation after the war of souls to drive the thin ranks of Nekara soliders from the lands, and take back their territory). The areas beyond the vingard mountians still are ruled by the Knights of Nekara however, and currently a truce has been called.

Now I never really liked the concept of the Dark Knights. The very aspect of evil is "EVIL TURNS ON ITSELF", this cannot be circumvented by a brutal organization of Lawful Evil Tyrany. Lawful Evil is still EVIL, structured evil but still evil, and Evil turns on itself. The Dark Knights should not have been able to hold onto Palanthas after the War of Souls, their organization beaten on many fronts, losing their Goddess, and losing much of their numbers fighting aginst the Dragon Overlords.

Anyway I've reorganized the political map to return areas which the Solmanic's should control. No longer should Palanthas and the traditional cities of GOOD be ruled by the dark knights. So while the dark knights still hold the East, the Solminics now control many of their formar holdings.
#2

zombiegleemax

Jan 08, 2005 16:58:27
Oh, I am with you on that.

The Knights of Takhisis were a STUPID idea. Seeing them described as honorable and such was pure crap to me. I am sure that HItler's SS troops were loyal and stuff, and that made them more evil then anything we had seen. I don't see the Knights of Takhisis as being any different.
#3

zombiegleemax

Jan 08, 2005 17:41:09
Good point. But.
You really think they could not hold on to Palanthas and much of Solamnia..Think again. Solamnia and solamnic knights are more or less a dead country. thay have been since chaos war..much was destroyd and not much has been rebuild. Think about it. since dark knights recruter all sort of scum in to there ranks since the chaos war, the pure knigts of solamnia did not. On the other hand, knights of neraka have joined with the dragon overlords and provided services, while geting richer, and expanding theere forces. And what did solamnia do? well it suffered from the dragon purge, then it was conquered by Skie the blue, and the dark knights, who at this time nolonger have a Fanatic devotion to Takhissis, but work for them self, and the glory of the order. (think of the samurai legions in feudal japan, they wore organized and devoted completly to there shogun, and they fought and killed without question for 1000 years, call them evil but they managed, and so did Knights of Neraka), now after the war of Souls...mina leads the knights in to battle and many die...sure, but hey..then knights of Solamnia have been exiled from Solanthis!becouse they wore cowards and didnt do much to help solamnia when mina invaded..jes, solamnia is really broken, from 4 MAJORE catastophies in last 4o years!! jesus..the needed atleast 50 years to recover from the chaos war, financialy and military...this is after all the midlle ages. But they didnt. Am not a fan boy of Knights of neraka...but i think they deserve a bit more spot light as evil organized sophisticated villians then you give them...
just a tough...a bit long but hey.

Sorry for spelling..its kinda bad.
#4

Dragonhelm

Jan 08, 2005 19:21:53
Now I never really liked the concept of the Dark Knights. The very aspect of evil is "EVIL TURNS ON ITSELF", this cannot be circumvented by a brutal organization of Lawful Evil Tyrany. Lawful Evil is still EVIL, structured evil but still evil, and Evil turns on itself.

What I like about the Dark Knights, at least the way they were originally presented, is that they were the answer to the question, "What if evil didn't turn upon itself?". Ariakan was smart enough to see what went wrong in the past, and used the lessons of the Knights of Solamnia against them.

As it turns out, evil did turn upon itself when Takhisis herself followed her own law, and turned against the KoT. Imagine what Ariakan could have done had his forces had been able to utilize sorcery and mysticism.

DmJoeSolarte, the SS correlation is a good one, and one I use myself. When I think of the KoT/KoN, I think about how they probably use propaganda, much like Nazi Germany did.

I love the Knights of Neraka, but I think my devotion is to them in their prime, during the Chaos War. After that, they just degenerated into the latest group of thugs and bullies.
#5

myriddian

Jan 09, 2005 0:34:12
What I like about the Dark Knights, at least the way they were originally presented, is that they were the answer to the question, "What if evil didn't turn upon itself?". Ariakan was smart enough to see what went wrong in the past, and used the lessons of the Knights of Solamnia against them.

As it turns out, evil did turn upon itself when Takhisis herself followed her own law, and turned against the KoT. Imagine what Ariakan could have done had his forces had been able to utilize sorcery and mysticism.

DmJoeSolarte, the SS correlation is a good one, and one I use myself. When I think of the KoT/KoN, I think about how they probably use propaganda, much like Nazi Germany did.

I love the Knights of Neraka, but I think my devotion is to them in their prime, during the Chaos War. After that, they just degenerated into the latest group of thugs and bullies.

Even at their best, the WoS I think that the only thing keeping nearly all the Darknights from turning on one another was the the vision Takhisis provided. It was a leash that was needed, a form of geas spell maybe. Ariakan and a few others may have been honourable but even at their prime the organisation was doomed. Not just because Takhisis would undoubtedly betray them when she saw fit but because of their flawed evil membership.
#6

zombiegleemax

Jan 09, 2005 23:10:39
Even at their best, the WoS I think that the only thing keeping nearly all the Darknights from turning on one another was the the vision Takhisis provided. It was a leash that was needed, a form of geas spell maybe. Ariakan and a few others may have been honourable but even at their prime the organisation was doomed. Not just because Takhisis would undoubtedly betray them when she saw fit but because of their flawed evil membership.

DUring World War 2, Heinrich Himler and the rest of the SS were very, very devoted to their Fuhrer and State and they operated on the belief that what they were doing was Good. I am sure in their own world they were somehow "honorable" amongst German Troops. By their standards honorable and noble, but pure evil in our real life.


Which is why I was so aghast at the mention of the Knights Takhisis and the way STeel Brightblade was. It was so freaking stupid it was an abomination and by the time I got done with SUMMERS FLAME.....

Put it this way, the more I read in the DLCS about what happened after SUMMER FLAME< it seems like it gets worser and worser for the "post-SUMMER FLAME" chronology.
#7

cam_banks

Jan 09, 2005 23:22:16
Which is why I was so aghast at the mention of the Knights Takhisis and the way STeel Brightblade was. It was so freaking stupid it was an abomination and by the time I got done with SUMMERS FLAME.....

So, you can't stand it because it's exactly modeled after fascist thought, or you can't stand it because it presents itself as objectively honorable even though the knights are evil?

I think the knights of Takhisis/Neraka have been handled very well indeed, even their current highly-factioned state. They're the perfect foil for heroes in any era. I make use of them a lot.

Cheers,
Cam
#8

greylord

Jan 09, 2005 23:38:13
Personally I don't think they should be able to hold onto Palanthas either. Most of the Knights should have started to realize how corrupt their leadership is...and with Mina tossed in with the death of their Goddess...they are RIPE for a civil war within their own organization.

Truthfully, because of the loss of purpose, there should be a change in the organization, a civil war of types in which they'd lose ground, but the end result would be to give them a new purpose and from the chaos...forge a stronger blade...so to say. So yes, then they'd probably be pushed back as they have their civil war, but in the end, emerge from it stronger then ever.
#9

Nived

Jan 10, 2005 6:28:36
Considering the "Rise of Solamnia" series on the horizon I suspect the political situation in Palanthas will be changing. With the correct amount of drama and what not.

As for the KoN I think they're a great foil, be it the (very few) truely Lawful Evil 'honorable' evil trying desperatly to hold their organization to some standard most of whom eventually betray their evil ideals in the end... think about it, Steel, Marshal Medan, Huzzad (Kang's Regiment), Valian (Rose and the Skull). All 'evil' knights that in the end choose honor above evil and paid for it with their lives, well accept Valian... he survived... I wonder what happened to that Dark Elf rogue Knight of the Lily, exile twice over... I should use him as an NPC sometime. On the flip side you have the degeneracy of the Knighthood into little more than a band of thugs.

Targonne for his faults and love of coin, held the kighthood together rather well, then you had Mina who really made them a solid force for the first time in 40 years. In the aftermath I really see the Kngihthood fractionalizing splintering into independant groups... possibly different ideologies... but I hope they don't fade.

Above all else I like the idea of the Knights of the Thorn as a force against the Wizards of High Sorcery... and I'd be sad to see that go.
#10

zombiegleemax

Jan 10, 2005 8:34:16
True the KoT/KoN have always been evil, but they were also honorable (lawful). There's nothing that prevents someone from being sadistic as well as obedient. Look at it this way. The evil knights have, in reality, two incarnations. The first is the honorable lawful evil Knights of Takhisis. The second being the neutral/chaotic evil Knights of Neraka. They're not even remotely the same organization after the Chaos War. They degenerated into a buch of thugs working for the dragon overlords. The reason they were able to hold onto Palanthas is that Skie choose that region as his domain and used the dark knights to keep order and collect his taxes.

Also the KoS did indeed change the way they inducted people into their knighthood. They began accepting women and people from neighboring lands, such as Tanin and Sturm Majere and later Linsha Majere. They were able to increase their numbers during the end of the Age of Despair and beginning of the Age of Mortals, but nowhere near the numbers of the KoT/KoN. That is the other reason why they weren't able to dislodge them KoN from Palanthas. Also remember that the KoS poured almost all their resources into breaking the seige of Sanction, and failed. So now they need to rebuild, yet once again, before any sort of assualt on Palanthas takes place.

Hopefully we'll see things turn around, now that most of the dragon overlords are dead and the gods have returned. I would think that the KoS should be able to dislodge teh KoN from Palanthas, but I don't think that the Palanthians are going to want any knighthoods running their cities or lands anytime soon. So it may be a bittersweet victory for the KoS, but we may yet see it under the protection of the KoS.
#11

zombiegleemax

Jan 10, 2005 8:35:04
I loved the Knights of Takhisis in there original form. I believe they suceeded because Ariakan did a decent job of eliminating those particular traits that cause evil to turn in upon itself. Traits such as selfish ambition, disloyalty, impiety, etc... He was able to do this while retaining evils ruthlessness and lack of compassion.

Also, I think if you look at the cosmology and mythology of Krynn, you can see that Law is nearly as important as Good in opposing evil. The leader of the Good Pantheon was Lawful Good, the original cosmic war was between Order (represented by the High God), and Chaos (represented by Ionthas).
#12

zombiegleemax

Jan 10, 2005 11:10:36
In my game this has already happened. The game is based in the summer of the year 424. The Solminics (The Knights and the general army) fought a one year campaign and liberated Palanthas and the western cities from the occupying forces. In the end the Solminics fought a series of battles, and retook lots of territory. The Knights of Nekara have withdrawn from palanthas and areas west of there for several reasons. First their ranks were spread thin ruling over such a territiory and were facing a determined army. Secondly they were finding difficulties contoling a hostile population with sizeable citizenry (After all Palanthas is one of the largest cities in the world). Finally the Knights of Nekara also still have some problems with their organization, thus making it harder to make a united front on a land that was not truely their own. So while the Knights of Nekara are not beaten (and probably won't be), as the Solmanics ceased their assult once Palanthas fell, and began to dig in on the defensive. The Dark Knights still control their traditional lands in the east, as well as the lands east of the Vingard mountians, as their forces are no longer as thinly spread, and does not face the oppositions to their rule that occured in Palanthas and other cities in the west. Currently a "Truce" has been called, and each side is mustering their forces, setting up border defences. Vingard Keep is a major Knights of Nekara stronghold, and a staging point for their activties. The Knights of Nekara, so want to continue their deeds, but are still attempting to rebuild their vision, and purpose, unlike the Knights of solminia who now have their Gods back.
#13

shugi

Jan 10, 2005 20:47:45
To add my two cents, Evil doesn't have a deadline to Turn Upon Itself. The Knights of Takhisis lasted longer than most other evil organizations, but it did turn upon itself in the end. A few times, actually.
#14

zombiegleemax

Jan 10, 2005 23:34:38
Yeah. You see Lord Auric (sp?), the now current death knight of DL, betraying Ariakan by posioning his dragon mount before the battle with the Chaos armies at the High Clerists Tower. Then the fall of from grace after the gods departed. Then a fall from grace again after Mina left. It seems to be a constant theme that eveil will turn against itself unless a strong-willed, ironfisted, charismatic leader leads them. Which is generally true of any big evil machine, the former Soviet Union, WWII Germany, Aparteid South Africa, etc.
#15

darthsylver

Jan 11, 2005 7:00:40
Originally posted by Bel-Marduk
I believe they suceeded because Ariakan did a decent job of eliminating those particular traits that cause evil to turn in upon itself.

It wasn't that Ariakan eliminated these traits it was that every knight had to take the test. In which they were tested by Takhisis and she was the one who killed those who did not pass her test (sorta like the test of magic, funny that way ain't it). After she left a few knights were admitted before mysticism was discovered and after that the knights were tested by Targonne, who essentially killed a potential knight if the knight portrayed traits that posed a threat to to Targonne. Which is why Targonne was able to hold onto the knighthood for so long. Now that the gods are are back I could see the gods of evil jockeying for the knights devotion if they could somehow get them away from mysticism. As they have demonstrated in the past the knights are very adaptable, at least in comparison to the Solamnic Knights.

What woudl the knights of Neraka be like if they did devote themselves to one of the current Knights of Evil.

Sargonnas - Honor, Evil, Strength, Vengeance - I could see a knighthood for sargonnas.
Chemosh - Death, - Nah.
Hiddukel - Lies, Deceit, Selfishness - Sorta like the knights are now.
Zeboim - Water, - Knights in armor and water, drop like a rock.
Morgion - Disease - Nah.
Nuitari - Magic - Nuitari has already demonstrated that he is willing to deceive his fellows about magic stuff, why not a whole knighthood.
#16

zombiegleemax

Jan 11, 2005 8:01:36
Should the KoN turn to Sagonnas it would be very bad indeed for the KoS, and for that matter the rest of Krynn. Could you imagine a combined force of KoN and Minotaurs acting in a unified manner. They'd have to be kept as two seperate armies, as I doubt the Minotaurs would willing accept the yoke from what they consider an inferior race. It's a good thing he's too involved with his Minotaurs to wrest control of the kinghthood. Otherwise it would be very bad, very bad indeed. As it stands though, eventually the knighthood and the minotaurs are going to come into conflict due the expansionistic nature of both organizations, and unless the KoN get their collective act together and unify they will be relegated to a mediocrity like the LoS.

The Solamnics face a similar relegation if they don't get their act together. Redoing the Measure, while a very good thing, is just one step in a long process to return them to glory and power. Unfortunately, they just really didn't do much during the beginning of the Age of Mortals, besides hole up in their territories and lick their wounds. Towards the end they tried to help out, especially at Sanction. Then they suffered a series of crippling defeats during the WoS, so now they're in a hurt locker at the moment as far as manpower and prestige goes. So rebuilding their knighthood won't be very easy. They need to get a few victories under their belts in this new age before the people will throng to them once again.
#17

ferratus

Jan 11, 2005 13:28:37
Personally, I like the idea of the Knights of Nereka taking over the Tamun Basuk and very little else. I don't like them as the rent-a-thugs for evil plots, as I feel there should be a great diversity of villanous power groups making their moves. For example, you could have made Chemosh recruit the Knights of Nereka by making them all Beloved... but isn't it cooler to have both Beloved and Knights of Nereka?

For their ethos, I would prefer to have them still follow their dead queen. Just because a diety is dead, doesn't mean that they can't still be worthy of veneration (In Takhisis' case it actually helps). Especially since she has left them with comparable sources of power to match the clerics of the unworthy living gods, namely Mysticism and Sorcery.

I'm all for the two Knighthoods to splinter to create more, especially on ideological lines. I've already done the same for Solamnics, dividing them based on class, nationality, and ethos. So I have a half-dozen minor knighthoods running around.

Can the same thing be done for the Knights of Nereka? Sure. Heck, just get a few of the more ambitious chromatics to ressurect the old WotL dragonarmy symbols and regalia. Primary colors and scale mail are back in fashion again baby!