How about bringing back Dark Sun?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

darkfliprush

May 29, 2005 18:03:50
Well I just started playing Dungeons and Dragons a year ago when I decided to DM. Well I have been looking about for a campaign world to run and I looked at several but none of them compared to the world of Dark Sun. Well not to long ago I got my hands on some 2nd edition Dark Sun books and I have been trying to convert them into 3rd edition and I was thinking that this would be so much easier if Wizards had done this. But thinking about...how many of you actually use this type of campaign. So that's what I'm trying to find out.
#2

captainswift

May 29, 2005 21:48:44
athas.org (no www) has done a lot of this work. They are the official fan site for the Dark Sun setting, recognized and authorized by WotC. They have a download that converts all the important stuff to 3e.

I liked this setting a lot, too, personally.
#3

elven_doritos

May 29, 2005 21:50:46
Dungeon magazine as well as its sister mag, Dragon, did updates for 3.5 of Dark Sun recently. Try checking out Paizo.com for ordering info.
#4

drmorganes

May 29, 2005 23:12:49
Dragon #319 has a boatload of 3.x updates for Dark Sun, particularly with the PC races.

Edit: Dungeon #110 has the rest of the Dark Sun updates.
#5

kvantum

May 30, 2005 0:15:29
Although those "updates" in Dragon aren't really a close conversion. They (Paizo) made a bunch of changes to the author's orginal article, trying to make Dark Sun more "availible" to your average players, like rules for Paladins. This of course is missing the whole damn point of Dark Sun, in that it *isn't* standard, typical fantasy.

So in other words, the Dragon updates are of questionable value. the folks at athas.org are doing pretty good work, though. (Not perfect though. I have quibbles here and there about their conversions, too.)
#6

the_shapeless_one

May 30, 2005 16:39:20
yeah I would also love to see this done.
#7

zombiegleemax

May 30, 2005 20:39:54
I'd be surprised if Wizards would consider this. I think they're sold on the Forgotten Realms, and is really trying to push Eberron. You never hear about Greyhawk any longer, which was supposed to be THE campaign world for 3E when it first came out (Living Greyhawk, that kind of thing).

So while I think this would be very cool, I don't see it happening unless Eberron falls flat.

Dungeon Master
http://dungeonsdragonsdmblog.blogspot.com
#8

Shemeska_the_Marauder

May 30, 2005 21:12:25
I doubt they would considering that one of the reasons TSR went belly up was due to market dilution (caused by having so many competing campaign settings/product lines).

Although, that said, I find it amusing that WotC started up Eberron after cancelling earlier settings because they had too many of them.

Frankly, if Ghostwalk had enough of a market to justify getting published, some of the older campaign settings I could easily see getting a single, one off hardcover to handle them. Darksun would work for that, Ravenloft is already handled by a 3rd party, and Planescape is the core planes and I wouldn't trust the current team to write up unless they got the Planescape design team to write it (and conversion is already being done by Planewalker )
#9

manyfist

May 30, 2005 21:26:50
So while I think this would be very cool, I don't see it happening unless Eberron falls flat.

That will never happen, Eberron is actually a Great Campaign.


On the other note. Darksun is just on the Athas.Org, WOTC isn't going to bring it back.
#10

zombiegleemax

Jun 01, 2005 9:33:28
Although, that said, I find it amusing that WotC started up Eberron after cancelling earlier settings because they had too many of them.

2e had way too many settings. 3e has had very, very few, and only two that were supported beyond the core, one being Eberron.

Frankly, if Ghostwalk had enough of a market to justify getting published,

How, exactly, did Ghostwalk have a market BEFORE it was published? Ghostwalk seemed more of a 'feeler' for campaign material; one that also failed horribly as far as I can see. My local gaming store has about 10 copies in the half-off bin, and has had them there for quite some time.

Personally, I think it was a pet project of Monte Cook's that WotC decided to try before he left.

As for Dark Sun itself, I wouldn't mind seeing a hard cover campaign setting, like Oriental Adventures or Dragonlance, but I'm not screaming for it. Even if it is a fairly popular setting, it simply will not sell enough to really warrant being a profitable item for WotC. WotC is a company out for money, afterall, and unless we fans pay for what we want, we ain't gonna git it. I don't see why WotC should effectively lose money just to placate a small percentage of fans who might not even buy for their product to begin with.
#11

ranger_reg

Jun 01, 2005 20:30:47
I don't want to see it revived.

I mean, what has Dark Sun fans ever done for me?
#12

darkfliprush

Jun 01, 2005 21:46:24
I didn't know that I would get this much feedback...thanks for the athas.org site. It was very helpful but it still lacks what a full hardbound rulebook would have.
This campaign may not have done anything for you in the present but look at the past and at how many people have played it and really enjoyed it. I haven't started playing this yet but setting up the campaign was just so exciting.
I was going to run an Eberron campaign but it's 3.5 more than 3.0 which is what I'm running.
About the magazines, I've read them and they didn't help a whole lot except in the characteristics of the races.
Thanks for the feedback.!
#13

amethal

Jun 02, 2005 3:14:18
I didn't know that I would get this much feedback...thanks for the athas.org site. It was very helpful but it still lacks what a full hardbound rulebook would have.
This campaign may not have done anything for you in the present but look at the past and at how many people have played it and really enjoyed it. I haven't started playing this yet but setting up the campaign was just so exciting.
I was going to run an Eberron campaign but it's 3.5 more than 3.0 which is what I'm running.
About the magazines, I've read them and they didn't help a whole lot except in the characteristics of the races.
Thanks for the feedback.!

Do you know there is a Dark Sun forum on these message boards?
#14

soel_griffin

Jun 02, 2005 7:22:55
it simply will not sell enough to really warrant being a profitable item for WotC. WotC is a company out for money, afterall, and unless we fans pay for what we want, we ain't gonna git it. I don't see why WotC should effectively lose money just to placate a small percentage of fans who might not even buy for their product to begin with.

They made the Environmental series of books, which were niche products, and targeted to dm's mostly. We're also getting a DMG 2. A single book, ala Ghostwalk, for Dark Sun or any other setting shouldn't be technically unfeasible.

Ghostwalk's failure, I would bet, falls largely on the fact that a dm would have to completely, radically alter his campaign, and many bolted in ideas about d&d to use the book. Dark Sun, or any other such book could be marketed as one-shot books that are self contained (Ghostwalk had a self-contained setting, but was marketed as a campaign expansion book) could be done, and might surprise wotc.
#15

zombiegleemax

Jun 02, 2005 15:08:18
They made the Environmental series of books, which were niche products, and targeted to dm's mostly. We're also getting a DMG 2. A single book, ala Ghostwalk, for Dark Sun or any other setting shouldn't be technically unfeasible.

I understand what you're saying, but the entire point of the policy is countermanded if small, one shot books pop up everywhere. Putting out one book that appeals to few draws audience away from Eberron, FR, and core, which is what their putting real money into. Just because something was published doesn't mean its feasible. The fact that we haven't seen core modules or campaign world conversions is evidence that they aren't feasible at all. DMG 2 is a special case in that while it applies to a small audience, that audience (DMs; read: hardcore D&D nerds) is the most likely to buy books and it has appeal no mater what style of game you run.
#16

zombiegleemax

Jun 03, 2005 2:55:23
I absolutely love being able to make a fun campaign out of the three core books.
Campaign settings are really fun sometimes, but I think creating a homebrew game is the funnest part of DMing. Its a pity that most DM's don't have enough time to do this.

I wish wotc would publish more material on creating your own worlds. But I know it would never really happen.
#17

soel_griffin

Jun 03, 2005 3:04:34
Core modules are happening. I think they just became feasible again. I bet WOTC would be surprised at the amount of folks who would buy this sort of book.

DMG 2 appeals to dms. It's very release goes against the arguments WotC once offered about niche products. Same goes for the Environment books ( although they have some player use as well, but much less than a dm will get.)

Ghostwalk was the tryout book for such a thing as what I talked about above, but its marketing made it seem like something different. If marketing was changed, then results could be very different than GW's.

I don't think WotC thinks so much in terms of taking away from the other settings' sales. If they did, then we would not see many other books. Of course, what do I know?

I just think they might start looking at their old properties again, and see what they can do with them. I did read that Birthright got licensed, so maybe they will offer the other old settings again...
#18

ruhl-than_sage

Jun 04, 2005 3:22:33
I just think they might start looking at their old properties again, and see what they can do with them. I did read that Birthright got licensed, so maybe they will offer the other old settings again...

What the hell! they're bring back birthright! :hoppingma
Dark Sun and Planescape both have a much larger fan base!

They better be putting some serious work into the regency system, because that was the whole point of the setting. I couldn't believe it when they decided to stop developing that aspect of the setting.

I quess I should admit that it was my third favorite setting.
#19

dracochapel

Jun 04, 2005 3:49:31
Yeah birthright was a really good setting in my opinion too. along with dark sun of course. any setting where elves are evil bastards is good in my mind (and one reason why 3rd ed FR has become appealing. those sun elves can be bad - much better than the drows 'were evil cause we are okay')
#20

Shemeska_the_Marauder

Jun 04, 2005 4:41:07
What the hell! they're bring back birthright! :hoppingma
Dark Sun and Planescape both have a much larger fan base!

But WotC is technically mining Planescape for monsters, concepts and all of the core planes. So they're still using it even if it's not getting tons of stuff on its own. Technically there's more stuff on it in 3e than Greyhawk. And when it was being offered to anyone, the Planescape license was "prohibitively expensive" from what I've been told by people who made offers for it.

The Birthright license, if it was actually sold, would be a hell of a lot cheaper likely considering its level of sales never approached that of Dark Sun, let alone Planescape (which did very well, but the printing cost was much higher for the entire line and so comparatively it didn't make as much cash despite good sales).
#21

ivid

Jun 04, 2005 6:56:18
What the hell! they're bring back birthright!

Go check the BR boards. That news were just a rumour. Although there's some tinkering on a BR 3.5 book there...
#22

ruhl-than_sage

Jun 04, 2005 10:48:16
Thanks
#23

darkfliprush

Jun 04, 2005 18:14:35
Wizards has all these different campaign settings that they could bring back to life. But I doubt they will because they do have all the statistics that TSR had. That gives them a good idea on what to bring out and what to leave in the past. Dark Sun does seem to a more popular one along with Greyhawk and Birthright. But Wizards strategy seems to be make up new campaigns and expand the current books that they have instead of using an existing campaign. It was nice, once again, for them to bring back Ravenloft...but why did they wait until 3.5?
#24

xlorepdarkhelm_dup

Jun 04, 2005 19:34:09
Wizards has all these different campaign settings that they could bring back to life. But I doubt they will because they do have all the statistics that TSR had. That gives them a good idea on what to bring out and what to leave in the past. Dark Sun does seem to a more popular one along with Greyhawk and Birthright. But Wizards strategy seems to be make up new campaigns and expand the current books that they have instead of using an existing campaign. It was nice, once again, for them to bring back Ravenloft...but why did they wait until 3.5?

  • Wizards doesn't need to bring out Greyhawk - that setting exists already, it is intertwined into the Core rulebooks, and the assumed setting. They just haven't provided much else other than that. Note how in the MM3, there is the "normal" info for a creature, and then specifics for Faerun and Eberron, which modify information from the standard, ie: Greyhawk.
  • Wizards did not bring back Ravenloft. Sword & Sorcery did (White-Wolf). Further, Ravenloft was brought back early in the 3.0 times, and then updated to 3.5 several months after that edition came out.
    Note: Wizards did not bring back Dragonlance, in the same way they didn't bring back Ravenloft. Sovereign Press (Margaret Weis' company) did. Wizards did release the first book, because they realized the money that could be made by doing that.


Technically, they could do similar things for each of the settings - however they have been reluctant to (read: completely blocking any) provide such an option to other groups. People have tried to do such a thing with Dark Sun, and WotC has denied them. People with money, and a rather sizeable amount to offer in order to do this have been shut down.
#25

zombiegleemax

Jun 06, 2005 0:22:27
Technically, they could do similar things for each of the settings - however they have been reluctant to (read: completely blocking any) provide such an option to other groups. People have tried to do such a thing with Dark Sun, and WotC has denied them. People with money, and a rather sizeable amount to offer in order to do this have been shut down.

Which makes it entirely likely that they are planning to do something with it in the future.
#26

dracochapel

Jun 06, 2005 0:59:39
or dark sun is a victim of been a popular setting and wotc dont want it coming back and grabbing a slice of the market under a 3rd party publisher.
I would think if they were going to release it themselves they wouldnt have allowed the Paizo conversion.
#27

ivid

Jun 06, 2005 4:06:08
Thanks

Welcome any time!
#28

xlorepdarkhelm_dup

Jun 06, 2005 12:53:04
Which makes it entirely likely that they are planning to do something with it in the future.

Actually, if I remember correctly, the big hang-up was they were considering a TV series, or a movie, or something, and wanted to hold onto the full rights of the setting without another complany publishing the product. But that was a while ago.
#29

ruhl-than_sage

Jun 06, 2005 16:30:38
Actually, if I remember correctly, the big hang-up was they were considering a TV series, or a movie, or something, and wanted to hold onto the full rights of the setting without another complany publishing the product. But that was a while ago.

Wow, that would be really wierd. 'Dark Sun, the Movie' a tale of way too much to explain to an attention deficet audience in an hour and a half or even two hours.

"I am the Sorcerer-King.. Kalak. I have tons of power and am evil and tyrranical, which I why I named my city: Tyr."

:hoppingma
"What the hell is going on Kalak is insane, we, the people of Tyr are upset and on the brink of revolt."

:fight!:
"Never fear I will save in a very unbelieveable fashion by thrown this spear at the all powerful king."


"Oh no!, he's a dragon"
#30

ruhl-than_sage

Jun 06, 2005 16:31:56
It wouldn't let me do what I actually wanted to, said there were too many images in the post.
#31

zombiegleemax

Jun 07, 2005 3:16:02
or dark sun is a victim of been a popular setting and wotc dont want it coming back and grabbing a slice of the market under a 3rd party publisher.
I would think if they were going to release it themselves they wouldnt have allowed the Paizo conversion.

True, but WotC's done pelenty dumb things before (Ghostwalk, Book of Exalted Deeds, etc.). I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to put it on hold indefinitely then come back in a year or two when they run out of ideas for new books and restart the Dark Sun line (probablely using the Paizo stuff as a basis if they follow their pattern).
#32

zombiegleemax

Jun 07, 2005 3:18:43
Actually, if I remember correctly, the big hang-up was they were considering a TV series, or a movie, or something, and wanted to hold onto the full rights of the setting without another complany publishing the product. But that was a while ago.

:whimper: