There are, of course, mistakes expected in every piece of work for D20 and DnD rules and such. I was wondering what, no matter how many or few, errors have been found (and corrected), in the module Spectre of Sorrows? Whether fan corrected and Cam (or another reliable source) affirmed or whatnot, I'd just like to be aware of them. Reading the book so many times can only help so much.
For example, I noticed that a few of the CRs in the back of the book for statistics seem to be inaccurate. A kender vampire's CR is equal to his levels, a few NPC CR's are lower than their levels while others are equal (that could be attesting to the rule in the DMG though concerning NPCs having lower CRs then PCs of equivelent levels, for obvious reasons though). Anyhow, if anyone could put forth some 'errata' they have found, or in the event I missed it, link me to a thread that already has, I'd be very appreciative.
There are a few errors in the book, almost all of which are simple errors in matching up text with stat blocks or in stat blocks that were altered after they were written in order to adjust the encounters a little. For the most part (I would say 99%) the adventure is playable as it's written, which given the size of it is pretty good.
Stat blocks are a devilish thing to monkey with. I've been doing them for years and I still occasionally miss a point or two.
Cheers,
Cam