Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1squidfur-Jan 01, 2006 1:40:19 | yeah, so happy new year to all youz!!! half-elf, half-gith....never mind the crazy backgroung. what would be the racial traits? have a few ideas, but want to see yours. wanting to make a half-elf, half-gith female assassin in the employ of the shadow king. figured i better have the stats first though |
#2PennarinJan 01, 2006 2:01:21 | This is nitpicking but I read in one of the short stories that gith lay eggs...kinda difficult to mate with such a creature then. I'd say pairing a Rebirth race with a gith doesn't work. Pairing a gith with a nikaal or other coldblooded lizard-like creature could work. |
#3kalthandrixJan 01, 2006 2:23:28 | This is nitpicking but I read in one of the short stories that gith lay eggs...kinda difficult to mate with such a creature then. I'd say pairing a Rebirth race with a gith doesn't work. If you follow with the adventure Black Spine, then the gith are not a rebirth race (unless you meant elves) as they are the degenerated off-spring of the Githyanki. As for a half gith/elf - I would say +4 Dex, -4 Cha (maybe -2 Con), no natural armor, +5 racial to jump, speed 30', +2 racial bonus to listen, search, perform, hide, move silently, and spot, natural resistance to extreme temps, low-light vision, natural weapon (claws) 1d3. LA+1 |
#4PennarinJan 01, 2006 3:15:55 | I would like to see a elf-tarek hybrid, like the one seen in the Prism Pentad. They should have a pretty amazing mix of features. Kal, I just meant that one of the adventures has a short story that reveals biological info on the gith which precludes them from mating with a mammalian. |
#5jon_oracle_of_athasJan 01, 2006 6:44:45 | I don't think elf and gith can produce offspring together unless magically bonded. As was mentioned, gith lay eggs. |
#6SysaneJan 01, 2006 12:56:18 | That’s odd that they lay eggs. If they're descendants of the githyanki that would make them mammalian. The last time I checked githyanki weren’t hatched. Maybe its possible that the githyanki that were left near mindless due to the mindbomb wandered from Yathizor to the vicinity of the Pristine Tower and were transformed into the gith. |
#7PennarinJan 01, 2006 16:11:43 | That’s odd that they lay eggs. If they're descendants of the githyanki that would make them mammalian. The last time I checked githyanki weren’t hatched. Oh my...could you possibly have...no, impossible...wow, yes, I think you found one! An inconsistency! Wow, they're so rare! :P |
#8SysaneJan 01, 2006 16:38:03 | Oh my...could you possibly have...no, impossible...wow, yes, I think you found one! An inconsistency! Wow, they're so rare! Yeah I know. I think the best explination was the Pristine Tower theory. Black Spine is relatively near it after all. |
#9kalindrenJan 01, 2006 17:48:34 | Ermm, Githyanki have always been egg laying. They were altered from a human race by the illithids millennia past before Gith led her people against their mind flayer masters and shattered the Illithid Empire. They are mammals but lay eggs to reproduce. I don't have access to most of my 2nd Ed studff at the moment but reference to egg laying can certainly be found in Dungeon 100 and some other 3rd Ed resources. |
#10SysaneJan 01, 2006 18:11:44 | Ermm, Githyanki have always been egg laying. They were altered from a human race by the illithids millennia past before Gith led her people against their mind flayer masters and shattered the Illithid Empire. They are mammals but lay eggs to reproduce. Is that a fact? I never seen any reference to the egg laying and I have most info on the Githyanki. I'll have to look thru it to verify that. |
#11kalthandrixJan 01, 2006 18:24:40 | They may be egg laying- but who is to say that the deed is not initially done 'animal style' ;) - eggs get fertilized, then they are lain to incubate- the gestation period just happens within an egg maybe because they must be kept at a higher temperature then the gith bodies can produce. If this is the way it is done, then there is no reason to think that it could not happen that a half breed is created. If the mother is gith then they would be hatched out of an egg and possibly be more gith-like, or the mother be of another race and is born normally for that race and have a greater number of the mothers racial features. |
#12SysaneJan 01, 2006 18:28:52 | I did a search and found this to be true (oddly enough). I found this quote on EN world from Erik Mona: We had to tackle this for "Incursion" a few years back. Apparently, githyanki _are_ egg layers, but I can't vouch for the pedigree of the original source. All I know is that I can't ever imagine introducing githyanki eggs in any of my campaigns. Sometimes, a new spin on a monster doesn't "take" for me, and this would be one such case. Take it for what its worth, but I tend to agree with that. |
#13zombiegleemaxJan 01, 2006 19:25:01 | having just read the Planescape "Guide to the Astral Plane" i can truely verify that Githyanki DO INDEED lay eggs. their cities on the astral have large hatcheries that basically exist in the prime and the astral (there is no time on the astral, so the eggs have to be incubated on the prime material). |
#14kalthandrixJan 01, 2006 21:00:50 | IIRC it is also in an old Dungeon mag adventure (let me check)....well I though it was in issue #43 "Into the Silver Realm" but I could not find a reference. It may also have been in Dragon #309 in the Incursion material that I recall seeing this reference. |
#15figmentofyourimaginationJan 02, 2006 18:13:54 | That’s odd that they lay eggs. If they're descendants of the githyanki that would make them mammalian. The last time I checked githyanki weren’t hatched. Oh my...could you possibly have...no, impossible...wow, yes, I think you found one! An inconsistency! Wow, they're so rare! Why would that be an inconsistancy? Egg laying mammals exist in real life, they are called monotremes. Check out this great article on monotremes. There's no reason that in a fantasy world with sentient insects that sentient montremes can't also occur. I never knew that about gith (or their ancestors), but I rather like the idea! |
#16ruhl-than_sageJan 02, 2006 18:33:43 | There are only three species of them belonging to two different families. Two kinds of Echidna and the infamous "duckbilled" Platypus. |
#17squidfur-Jan 02, 2006 21:08:00 | Ermm, Githyanki have always been egg laying. They were altered from a human race by the illithids millennia past before Gith led her people against their mind flayer masters and shattered the Illithid Empire. They are mammals but lay eggs to reproduce. Yeppers...he is correct on that. Forgot all about that, and kind of embarressed that I've missed the ds reference. OH WELL!!! |
#18PennarinJan 04, 2006 13:39:02 | Why would that be an inconsistancy? Egg laying mammals exist in real life, they are called monotremes. Check out this great article on monotremes. There's no reason that in a fantasy world with sentient insects that sentient montremes can't also occur. I never knew that about gith (or their ancestors), but I rather like the idea! Er, you're missing the point here. Yes this is a fantasy setting, thus incredible things can happen, but as far as I know children are still created through intercourse requiring compatible sex organs, compatible DNA (humans and dwarves apparently are compatible enough), and compatible "womb" system. Half-drakes and half-elementals can be created through mystic fusion of the two base creatures, but there is no intercourse. In the same way an Athasian human cannot have a crodlu-child from having intercourse with his crodlu, if you pardon me the image. In short, I don't think gith are compatible with any of the classic Rebirth races, not having (at the very least) a compatible "womb" system. |
#19ruhl-than_sageJan 04, 2006 15:24:03 | :D , What's wrong with half-crodlu? |
#20ZardnaarJan 04, 2006 16:06:59 | :D , What's wrong with half-crodlu? The Athasian night can get cold |
#21hunterccJan 04, 2006 16:12:37 | If you wanted, I suppose you could say that 1 in a million attempts to breed a half-gith results in a genetic "freak", which may make the "womb" system compatible after all... Then you could answer that ages old question: "What came first, the gith or the egg?" :D |
#22PennarinJan 04, 2006 16:14:58 | Then you could answer that ages old question: "What came first, the gith or the egg?" :D Hehe! |
#23ZardnaarJan 04, 2006 16:43:27 | Then you could answer that ages old question: "What came first, the gith or the egg?" :D Thats probably a major component of Balic philosophy. |
#24squidfur-Jan 04, 2006 16:50:13 | ok, well, still haven't given up on this one. just gonna have to go the magical route, but this still begs the question of what abilities you think they'd have. and what about a half-inix for all those lonely half-giants :D |
#25jon_oracle_of_athasJan 05, 2006 10:38:54 | A gith is already something that appears as a crossbreed of elf and reptile. :P |
#26SysaneJan 05, 2006 10:42:40 | Sounds like ground to make an Athasian satyr. |
#27nytcrawlrJan 05, 2006 12:56:10 | They are mammals but lay eggs to reproduce. Kinda like the duck-billed platapus. ;) There are at least 5 real world equivalents of mammals laying eggs. .... Er, Fig beat me to it. |
#28nytcrawlrJan 05, 2006 13:01:47 | The Athasian night can get cold "And I thought they smelled bad on the outside." |
#29nytcrawlrJan 05, 2006 13:05:26 | Sounds like ground to make an Athasian satyr. Um no, let's not go there. Yeah, yeah, that's it, don't go there, bad image. :D |
#30ZardnaarJan 05, 2006 14:33:42 | "And I thought they smelled bad on the outside." Star Wars quote :D Have a cookie |
#31jon_oracle_of_athasJan 05, 2006 14:34:32 | "And I thought they smelled bad on the outside." Empire Strikes Back, Han Solo when slicing up the Tauntaun. As for a Dark Sun variant, tried boiling a kank? "And I thought they tasted bad uncooked" |
#32kalthandrixJan 05, 2006 14:41:00 | The Athasian night can get cold Ya- this is really wrong on so many different levels- lets keep it PG shall we |
#33nytcrawlrJan 05, 2006 14:51:17 | Ya- this is really wrong on so many different levels- lets keep it PG shall we Yeah, I think he was shooting for PG-13 on that one. Which means hypothetically there is a line, but you can dance it like you are the star of Flashdance. :D See the King Kong remake and Chronicles of Narnia: Lion, Witch and the Wardrobe for examples. |
#34ruhl-than_sageJan 05, 2006 17:55:32 | Kinda like the duck-billed platapus. ;) Sorry, according to my book there are only three! |
#35nytcrawlrJan 05, 2006 18:06:58 | Sorry, according to my book there are only three! Well then you are reading the wrong book. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotreme * ORDER MONOTREMATA o Family Ornithorhynchidae: platypus + Platypus, Ornithorhyncus anatinus o Family Tachyglossidae: echidnas + Short-beaked Echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus + Long-beaked Echidna, Zaglossus brujinii + Cyclops Long-beaked Echidna, Zaglossus attenboroughi + Barton's Long-beaked Echidna, Zaglossus bartoni If you want to get really technical, there have been 9 total species counting those that are extinct. |
#36ruhl-than_sageJan 05, 2006 18:18:08 | Well then you are reading the wqrong book. :D I think I'll trust my copy of: "The Encyclopedia of Animals: A Complete Visual Guide" (released by University of California Press, 1st copyright 2004) over the Wikipedia. And extinct species do not count. plus, if you want to get really technical we don't have any idea how many extinct species of egg-laying mammals there might have been in the past. Fossil records are far from complete. If you'll look further into the sources that mention those "extra" species you'll notice that it is a book published in 1998 and they were listed as endangered. Those two species have probably gone extinct since then. |
#37nytcrawlrJan 05, 2006 18:44:11 | Well then I stand corrected. :embarrass Wikipedia is usually more up to date than that on most of the subjects I read up on. So no more Long-beaked Echidna or Cyclops Long-beaked Echidna for us. Interesting, the Cyclops Long-beaked Echidna is mentioned to *have lived* in the Cyclops mountains in Irian Jaya, but doesn't mention anything about it's extinction in the article other than that. Nice way of updating there, heh. |
#38kalthandrixJan 05, 2006 21:08:39 | This is why he is the SAGE, man! :D |
#39nytcrawlrJan 06, 2006 8:27:34 | This is why he is the SAGE, man! :D Yeah, I can't wait till I can start taking some biology classes when I start up school again. Miss learning about this stuff. |
#40jon_oracle_of_athasJan 06, 2006 10:29:35 | This is a pretty bizarre thread. I have a feeling it'll be like the french-canadian thread - it'll be a kank that reanimates indefinitely. |
#41jon_oracle_of_athasJan 06, 2006 10:33:30 | This is why he is the SAGE, man! :D Shouldn't he be able to spell his name properly then? :P |
#42KamelionJan 06, 2006 10:49:00 | This is a pretty bizarre thread. I have a feeling it'll be like the french-cananadian thread - it'll be a kank that reanimates indefinitely. Don't say its name! Don't say its name!! Shouldn't he be able to spell his name properly then? :P |
#43ruhl-than_sageJan 06, 2006 14:16:35 | Shouldn't he be able to spell his name properly then? :P An irreconcilable clerical error.... |
#44KamelionJan 06, 2006 16:05:34 | An irreconcilable clerical error.... Those darned clerics, always sticking their noses in and messing things up for everyone else! At least under the 2e rules, this could never have happened - there weren't any clerics back in those days... |
#45jon_oracle_of_athasJan 06, 2006 16:25:26 | An irreconcilable clerical error....QUOTE] |
#46PennarinJan 06, 2006 19:18:11 | This is a pretty bizarre thread. I have a feeling it'll be like the french-cananadian thread - it'll be a kank that reanimates indefinitely. Someone's old fashionned here, no one called us that since about '65... :P |
#47jon_oracle_of_athasJan 07, 2006 2:54:41 | Edited my post. It now reads french-canadians. Though maybe it should read "quasi-arrogant wannabe frogeaters". ;) :P |
#48PennarinJan 07, 2006 3:03:22 | Edited my post. It now reads french-canadians. Though maybe it should read "quasi-arrogant wannabe frogeaters". ;) :P My my, what language! :D Quebecers will do fine, or lords-of-all-we-survey-and-then-some. |
#49jon_oracle_of_athasJan 07, 2006 3:16:15 | How about "people whose ancestors ate frogs"? :P |
#50greyormJan 07, 2006 10:15:00 | How about "people whose ancestors ate frogs"? :P Impossible! They don't have compatible womb-systems. :D |
#51nytcrawlrJan 07, 2006 14:36:13 | Edited my post. It now reads french-canadians. Though maybe it should read "quasi-arrogant wannabe frogeaters". ;) :P Hmmmm, I guess that makes me a wannabe quasi-arrogant wannabe frogeater. Boys, let the revolution begin. Follow me to Norway! :bounce: |
#52squidfur-Jan 07, 2006 17:23:21 | Impossible! They don't have compatible womb-systems. :D :heehee |