Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1kalthandrixOct 06, 2006 7:27:24 | I realize that is has been a while since I have posted any of my work here on the board, so here is a new critter that I whipped up this week - designed to be a kind of symbolic creature and inspiration for a new PrC that I am working on for the material cnahumck and I are doing to flesh out the area around the Twilight Hall (see the twilight warrior template for more info). As always - comments and feedback are welcome. Enjoy.
|
#2redkank_dupOct 06, 2006 8:22:50 | Cool idea - I particularly like the gliding and the Up the Walls feat idea. Should make for some interesting combats, eh? What would a post from me be without a crit or two, though? In which vein... Why does the creature have Grapple +12? I make it +8 (BAB +5, Str +3). Where are the extra 4 points coming from? Is the idea that it gets a racial bonus for all those legs? It should maybe note that somewhere, eh? I count the creature as having 2 skill points too many. As a 5HD magical beast with Int 6, it should have 8 skill points I break your totals down as follows: Balance +20 (racial +15, Dex +5, 0 ranks), Climb +19 (racial +15, Str +3, 1 rank), Hide +10* (+4 racial, Dex +5, 1 rank), Jump +20 (+15 racial, Str +3, 2 ranks), Listen +4 (Wis +1, 3 ranks), Move Silently +10 (+4 racial, Dex +5, 1 rank), Spot +3 (Wis +1, 2 ranks) Did you add Dex to Jump instead of adding Str? I've done that before myself - it would explain the extra 2 points. I think that CR 5 is too high. I would put it at 3. It can deal out decent damage and has an offensive psionic power, but with AC 18 and only 42 hp, it wouldn't last very long at all against a party of 5th-level characters. It could easily do down in a single round. This is just ballpark, though, so playtest it and see how it flies, eh? Advancement should be 5-10 HD, as the go in increments of double the base HD, so far as I recall. The italicised description shouldn't name the creature, eh? It should be something that you might read to the players when they first see it. That aside, there's some nice flavorful description in there, dude I'm not gonna rag on small issues of spelling and grammar, cuz, well, I think that would be lame after *****ing about 2 skill points, lol. Everything else is tight. The things I raise above aren't major issues, I reckon, and it's a fine creature with a great concept and a couple of original powers (like I say, the gliding wall-climbing thing is killer). Good job, man . |
#3kalthandrixOct 06, 2006 9:51:06 | Cool idea - I particularly like the gliding and the Up the Walls feat idea. Should make for some interesting combats, eh? The additional +4 for grapple comes from their Improved Grab - I have always been working under the assumption that this ability was like improved grapple, which gives a +4 to grapple checks. At first level, they always get at least 4 points IIRC - it could be off because i made some last minute changes one some things and do not recall if I went back through and recalced the skill stuff - I will look it iver again this weekend. I do not think the for advancement it is a hard and fast rule that it is double the creatures base HD - I have read nothing that states that is is, so if you have the documentation I would like to read it. As for naming the creature in the opening material - again - not a hard and fast rule - look at the tigone in the Terrors of Athas from Athas.org :P (just one example that i have found, but there are more). As for grammer and spelling - hey if you think it could be better or if something is spelled wrong, let me know. I do use spellcheck and read over the stuff, but spellcheck is not 100% and I (and many others) have a hard time catching things in my own writing - so let me know what could be fixed - the worst that could happen is that I ignore you :D :P |
#4redkank_dupOct 06, 2006 10:03:24 | The additional +4 for grapple comes from their Improved Grab - I have always been working under the assumption that this ability was like improved grapple, which gives a +4 to grapple checks. Nah, man - it doesn't give the +4. Here's the text on improved grab in its entirety: Improved Grab (Ex): If a creature with this special attack hits with a melee weapon (usually a claw or bite attack), it deals normal damage and attempts to start a grapple as a free action without provoking an attack of opportunity. No initial touch attack is required. Unless otherwise noted, improved grab works only against opponents at least one size category smaller than the creature. The creature has the option to conduct the grapple normally, or simply use the part of its body it used in the improved grab to hold the opponent. If it chooses to do the latter, it takes a –20 penalty on grapple checks, but is not considered grappled itself; the creature does not lose its Dexterity bonus to AC, still threatens an area, and can use its remaining attacks against other opponents. A successful hold does not deal any extra damage unless the creature also has the constrict special attack. If the creature does not constrict, each successful grapple check it makes during successive rounds automatically deals the damage indicated for the attack that established the hold. Otherwise, it deals constriction damage as well (the amount is given in the creature’s descriptive text). When a creature gets a hold after an improved grab attack, it pulls the opponent into its space. This act does not provoke attacks of opportunity. It can even move (possibly carrying away the opponent), provided it can drag the opponent’s weight. At first level, they always get at least 4 points IIRC - it could be off because i made some last minute changes one some things and do not recall if I went back through and recalced the skill stuff - I will look it iver again this weekend. Yeah, 4 points for the first HD and then one each for the next 4 HD, making 8. I do not think the for advancement it is a hard and fast rule that it is double the creatures base HD - I have read nothing that states that is is, so if you have the documentation I would like to read it. The precedence set by every creature with an advancement line is plenty documentation. Just look at the Monster Manuals - all of those creatures with advancement lines by HD use this method. If you can find me one that doesn't, I would like to read it ;). Edit:Also, check out the Advancement section on p302 of the Monster Manual. It outlines the process there. As for naming the creature in the opening material - again - not a hard and fast rule - look at the tigone in the Terrors of Athas from Athas.org :P (just one example that i have found, but there are more). Again, look at all of the creatures in the Monster Manuals. They set the precedence for this. And I have no idea what you mean about the tigone. My copy of Terrors of Athas just says this: This creature is a large feline with deep yellow eyes and a short, greenish hide. Large and sleek, it moves with the steady, padding gait of the predator. Do you guys have some secret internal bizarro version that the rest of us aren't aware of? :P As for grammer and spelling - hey if you think it could be better or if something is spelled wrong, let me know. I do use spellcheck and read over the stuff, but spellcheck is not 100% and I (and many others) have a hard time catching things in my own writing - so let me know what could be fixed - the worst that could happen is that I ignore you :D :P Lol, OK. I am going out for a few hours in a bit, but I'll do a sweep later on. There's no better way I like to spend my Friday nights than checking spelling and grammar. Party on Wayne... |
#5kalthandrixOct 06, 2006 10:40:00 | Again, look at all of the creatures in the Monster Manuals. They set the precedence for this. And I have no idea what you mean about the tigone. My copy of Terrors of Athas just says this: That was from the current version that I had just looked at from the Athas.org site - downloaded it just to look this issue up. As for having a secret internal version - are you under the assumption that I am part of Athas.org - because I am not and do not have access to their super-secret squirrel-top shelf-classified documents. I am but a lowly fan, creating material for the general public and doing what I can to make my mark on Athas. As for the fixes - all are easy to change - if I want to that is :P. I will look over it all again later - I have a new Eberron game starting tonight and have just a little bit of prep work to do or I would do the research tonight. One thing I thought about doing, but did not put much time into developing more aside from a small reference, was the use of the kir'ren's tail as an grasping tool or something - like holding branches or aiding it climbing by stabbing the spike into the tree as an anchor. If I were to go that route, maybe I would also make the tail longer and give it a reach of 10 ft. Thoughts on that? |
#6thebraxOct 06, 2006 11:53:11 | I'm not sure why I like this creature so much. It's really just about perfect, feels natural for Athas. I don't think you should add a reach tail attack. The only critique I'd make (other than the grammar stuff that I sent you by email) is that I think that the glide ability would be more believable in a small 3hd version. |
#7kalthandrixOct 06, 2006 12:08:22 | Made some updates on the wording and such in some areas - darn you grammer-lawyers! :D As for a 3HD version - Like I said in my e-mail Brax, I just feel it would lose something being small. In my mind, I just do not feel that it would still have the same "danger" factor to it that would inspire the same fear/desire hunters would have when looking for these creatures if it were small. Originally I had it with the psi-like ability to use psionic levitate at will as a free or immediate action - but felt like that was a cheap cop-out and so I dropped it. |
#8redkank_dupOct 06, 2006 13:56:38 | That was from the current version that I had just looked at from the Athas.org site - downloaded it just to look this issue up. Not sure if you're agreeing with me here or not (just had a few beers, heh heh). But the version at Athas.org matches the text I quoted - no reference to the tigone by name in the italicized text. As for having a secret internal version - are you under the assumption that I am part of Athas.org - because I am not and do not have access to their super-secret squirrel-top shelf-classified documents. I am but a lowly fan, creating material for the general public and doing what I can to make my mark on Athas. Yah, I had thought that you were doing their new prestige class document or something. Oh well, my bad, eh? As for the fixes - all are easy to change - if I want to that is :P. Totally. Dude, they're minor changes. Like TheBrax says, it's a killer concept and I really like the creature. I'll be throwing two or three or four of these at my players next time we play DS for sure. One thing I thought about doing, but did not put much time into developing more aside from a small reference, was the use of the kir'ren's tail as an grasping tool or something - like holding branches or aiding it climbing by stabbing the spike into the tree as an anchor. Hmm, that could work I guess, but I'd also say to leave it as it is. You've nailed a really solid creature here, Kal. |
#9kalthandrixOct 06, 2006 14:08:35 | I am working on an official project, but I am not a member of Athas.org - unless I am and no one has told me If I were they would have to make a new Bureau called the Bureau of Total Awesomeness cuz that is how I roll :D Maybe I was hitting the crack to hard or just reading what I wanted, but I cannot find the reference again with the name things in it - oh well - I have already fixed the kir'ren and got a jump on the grammar and writing stuff - I think it is 100% right now and very readable. I could totally see some rich noble having like 2 or 3 of these as "guardcats" - it would be totally awesome! With scent and detect hostile intent on full-auto mode, there is not much that is going to sneak up on these creatures. If a druid or ranger were to be able to select this creature for an animal companion (but I do not think they could unless they had like some kind of improved animal companion feat or class feature) it would add to the wicked sickness of having to deal with a creature like this. I am glad people like this - like I said, there will be a PrC coming soon that draws its inspiration from these creatures so hopefully it will draw the same kind of reactions. |
#10jon_oracle_of_athasOct 06, 2006 14:16:33 | Cool critter. |
#11cnahumckOct 06, 2006 22:58:21 | I am glad that everyone likes it. Kal and I are working on an area for the Twilight Soldiers, and these guys are a cool creature for that area. The PrC is gunna be great too. Jump charges... Sweet! |