But anyone that has the DLCS, if you view the timeline you will notice that the year 408 AC is listed twice. This actually throws the Timeline off by 2 years as the second 408 AC should have been 410 AC. So the actual Year of the Great Storm, from the War of Souls is 421 AC not 419 AC. The Age of Mortals timeline has the correct years listed for it. In the DLCS basically take every year after (the first) 408 AC and add two years to it.
Additional errata: there's a half-orc mentioned in the DLCS - replace it with human or half-ogre and we're good to go.
Originally posted by Eidolon
Additional errata: there's a half-orc mentioned in the DLCS - replace it with human or half-ogre and we're good to go.
Oi! How did that one slip under the radar?
Originally posted by Brimstone
Oi! How did that one slip under the radar?
Well.. technically it didn't (I believe Andre noticed it) ... but I guess, (like the timeline change) that it just didn't get caught in time before the "seal of approval" was stamped on it.
Originally posted by talinthas
yeah, there are a bunch of small issues like that. Justinius instead of Justarius is another, and my initial review caught a few more.
Early DL materials used the name Justinius. I'm not sure where that was changed to Justarius.
Sort of like Palanthus/Palanthas. ;)
Originally posted by Kipper Snifferdoo
Well.. technically it didn't (I believe Andre noticed it) ... but I guess, (like the timeline change) that it just didn't get caught in time before the "seal of approval" was stamped on it.
yeah...I kinda gathered that from your first post.
I guess what I meant was...how was it even written in the first place?
I guess, being a DL guy only (with the occasionaly stint into Forgotten Realms, where I don't think I've ever run into an orc anyway) I never even think about it...and would never make the mistake of "half-orc" over "half-ogre." But...I guess if one is more used to the "half-orc" I can see how something like that could get in there.
In what context is it used? Please don't tell me it's Groller...
On page 212 it says under the "Create Skeletal Warrior" ability that "a death knight of at least 15 Hit Dice may transform a dead humanoid into a skeletal warrior).
On page 214, under the stats for Sir Ausric Krell he is listed as having 12d12 hit dice. If I'm not mistaken that is three shy of being able to make skeletal warriors himself.
Originally posted by Kipper Snifferdoo
Ok, here is somthing that might need to be addressed in errata. On page 187 under the description of Storm's Keep it tells how Sir Ausric Krell (the new Death Knight) "forces those he kills to serve him forever as skeletal warriors."
On page 212 it says under the "Create Skeletal Warrior" ability that "a death knight of at least 15 Hit Dice may transform a dead humanoid into a skeletal warrior).
On page 214, under the stats for Sir Ausric Krell he is listed as having 12d12 hit dice. If I'm not mistaken that is three shy of being able to make skeletal warriors himself.
Yep...got that one taken care of.
Here's another interesting one (most are just tiny stupid mistakes...but some are interesting enough to mention). In the War of the Lance section...in the write ups of the gods, Solinari, Lunitari, and Nuitari are all mentioned as "walking the world of Ansalon looking for mortals to teach their magic too." They go on to say, "this is happening during the All-Saints War when the gods of good, evil, and neutrailty are warring over the spirits in the heavens that will one day inhabit the earth." (paraphrased, of course). LOL! Little contradictory, eh?
Not to mention, the three gods of magic weren't even born until after the All-Saints War anyway...as a sort of peace offereint between warring factions. :DAnother interesting one is the description of the Age of Starbirth (the first paragraph). Yeah...oops. ;)
And my personal favorite...the 200 mile long Schallsea Island. heh heh Well...it was 200 miles long on the old SAGA scale...but not the "new" one.
But...really, most of the mistakes I've found/recorded have been of the typo/mis-type kind of mistakes. All in all...not too shaby...considering the number of authors and the use of WotC editors that are probably not as versed with DL as most of the authors are and wouldn't catch little subtlties like "half-orc" or the use of "Justinius" or the use/mis-use/confusion of "Ariakas/Ariakan."
Okay...I know I'm making it look like alot...but really, it's not as bad as I'm making it out to be.
Originally posted by Kipper Snifferdoo
On page 214, under the stats for Sir Ausric Krell he is listed as having 12d12 hit dice. If I'm not mistaken that is three shy of being able to make skeletal warriors himself.
Oh...and this kinda screws with the example given for a Skelletal Warrior, the minotaur...Gamesh (or whatever it was).
Anyway...it said he was turned by Lord Krell. Heh heh...oops.
At first I thought that maybe Lord Krell didn't get enough HD, but after looking it over, I think they gave him the right amount, because his powerword and symbol powers match a 12HD Death Knight. Also, there is no mention of the ability to Raise Skelletal Warrior in his write up.
So...it must be mistakes in the other write ups...not Lord Krell's. Of course...one could remedy all of this by giving Lord Krell 3 more levels of Knight of the Lily.
Rosisha, a loyal follower of Lunitari
Originally posted by Rosisha
Knights of the Lily are the Grey Robes right? The evil SOB's that do not follow Nuitari?! HOW DARE THEY CLAIM MAGICAL POWER! GRR
Rosisha, a loyal follower of Lunitari
Calm down there loyal follower...
Knights of the Lily are the fighters. Knights of the Skull are the clerics, and Knights of the Thorn are the wizards.
Rosisha, hoping to beat up some Knights of the Thorn when the DL campaign starts up in a month!!!!
Originally posted by carteeg
I'm still trying to figure out how Nuitari and Zeboim are twins when Nuitari was conceived a LONG time after Zeboim's birth. Personally, I think that would sprain something on Sargonnas and/or Takhisis.
Shoot, I missed that reference.
Got a page number for me, carteeg?
Originally posted by talinthas
also to note for age of mortals. Somehow, neither palin nor dalamar have alignments...
All will be made good in reprints...
Cheers,
Cam
Originally posted by Brimstone
Shoot, I missed that reference.
Got a page number for me, carteeg?
Nevermind, I found it.
Well...my errata is done.
89 entries! Whew! It's alot more than I had hoped there'd be...but at least it's thorough. heh heh
Originally posted by Brimstone
Nevermind, I found it.
Well...my errata is done.
Do you plan to make the liost of errata available online?
Originally posted by RandPC
Do you plan to make the liost of errata available online?
Yep...I've already submitted it to the WC for approval to the Nexus. We'll have to wait and see what they say.
Oh...and thanks, Kip!
[Sorry for the delay in my seeing your question for the page numbers. Got sent to the hospital today. Kidney stones suck.]
Originally posted by carteeg
So how is the errata correcting the twin issue? Stating they're not twins, or is Nuitari actually older than the other two cousins?
[Sorry for the delay in my seeing your question for the page numbers. Got sent to the hospital today. Kidney stones suck.]
Zeboim is older.
According to this latest and greatest version of the Iconochronos, Zeboim is born after the All-Dragons War, when most of the intermediate gods are born. Nuitari is born later, which is at the same time as Solinari and Lunitari at the close of the Age of Starbirth, after the All-Saints War...as a sort of "peace offereing" or "vow" to never make war again...yeah that lasts long. LOL!
Anyway...no, they are not twins.
Oh, man, sorry to hear about the kidney stones...that sucks. :sad: But, no worries mate, got it all taken care of.
(I did some double reading on the other gods to make sure I didn't miss any other references like that...the only twins are Kiri-Jolith and Habbakuk).Arandur