Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1davethebrave371Oct 12, 2003 20:02:28 | Why is this still up in the product catalog if Wizards of the Coast isn't coming out with any new d20 Planescape products? Is it to taunt us? And if so, why hasn't karma destroyed everything they hold dear yet? :thumbsdow :sad: :hoppingma:headexplo |
#2Ryltar_SwordsongOct 12, 2003 20:16:13 | My guess is it keeps slipping through the cracks when they update the site. |
#3zombiegleemaxOct 13, 2003 5:28:45 | Well, they fixed it now. Probably because you could sue for false advertising because they're suggesting you can buy something you can't. What was it, by the way? |
#4Ryltar_SwordsongOct 13, 2003 5:37:17 | He's pointing out the fact that PS still has a category in the product catalog when there are no new products coming out. It's still there, so it's not fixed. |
#5zombiegleemaxOct 14, 2003 12:49:58 | on an entirely unrelated note, I apologize but does anyone know where you can get the epic lvl blackguard picture from the epic lvl handbook on some kind of format? I have the epic lvl book but do not have access to a printer and thats just a cool picture I've been dying to get my hands on hehe... Again sorry for straying off the topic Just thought of it when I saw Ryltar, again I apologize for any inconvenience |
#6davethebrave371Oct 14, 2003 20:19:02 | Originally posted by Amoun *cough* a) Start a new thread with a new idea, b) Start it in the appropriate forum (i.e. the ELH forum) and c) Right here. |
#7zombiegleemaxOct 15, 2003 18:03:45 | hehe I dont think it was worth a new thread... and again I apologize for any inconvenience and thank dave for his assistance. (I really didnt think it was that big of an issue) |
#8Ryltar_SwordsongOct 15, 2003 18:23:52 | I didn't think it was that big a deal either. |
#9factol_rhys_dupOct 15, 2003 19:27:01 | I didn't either but let's keep this thread going! |
#10davethebrave371Oct 15, 2003 19:32:09 | Eh, suppose it wasn't at that. Sorry if I came off a little uppity! |
#11zombiegleemaxOct 17, 2003 19:36:38 | Originally posted by Ryltar Swordsong I can't see anything. |
#12Ryltar_SwordsongOct 17, 2003 21:34:42 | When you click the link, a products page opens with the PS logo at the top. Dave is saying that that should be removed since WotC does not support PS. |
#13zombiegleemaxOct 20, 2003 1:05:52 | Well, that's fine, as long as they don't list any products as available for sale. |
#14davethebrave371Oct 20, 2003 18:15:38 | Originally posted by nick012000 Well, it may be fine for you, but they don't have any Birthright stuff being made, and Birthright isn't selectable. No Mystara stuff being made, and Mystara isn't selectable. You get the point, I'm sure. So why do they still have Planescape up there? I'd rather have them kill my false hope that they'll ever actually put out anything Planescape than leave that up there for me to wonder and gasp giddily that perhaps, just perhaps, my all-time favourite RPG setting (nevermind D&D setting) might come back. I know it's not true, so STOP TORMENTING ME! (no pun intended) |
#15zombiegleemaxOct 21, 2003 0:47:54 | Originally posted by Factol Rhys Sounds fun. I've never kept a thread going for the sheer sake of... ...well, keeping a thread going. I think I'll give it a try! Did the planes give you this idea, Factol Lady? |
#16factol_rhys_dupOct 21, 2003 17:52:06 | Originally posted by Tertek As a matter of fact, yes. They said it was really important to keep this one open. I just do what I'm told. Anyway, we know that the Products page still has an empty Planescape directory, but we're all very disappointed that they would tempt us into thinking that the might in the future consider thinking about maybe looking at supporting the setting as a possibility. Now that that's settled. anyone else care to contribute to an effort to have a meaningless post stay open? |
#17davethebrave371Oct 21, 2003 18:02:53 | Originally posted by Factol Rhys Seconded. |
#18zombiegleemaxOct 21, 2003 18:43:40 | Sounds like fun. I wonder just how long this thread will last. |
#19factol_rhys_dupOct 21, 2003 19:51:26 | Funky, you scramble what speech know is? Idea those have Xaositects great a. Keep thread this maybe open will the. |
#20zombiegleemaxOct 22, 2003 0:55:34 | Originally posted by davethebrave371 I know it's not true, so STOP TORMENTING ME! (no pun intended) No pun intended? No pun intended? Oh I know what your intentions where..... |
#21zombiegleemaxOct 22, 2003 1:03:33 | !erofeb siht ekil etiuq ti enod reven ev'I esuaceb drawkcab gnipyt trats ot evah tsuj yam I kniht I ,lleW |
#22lord_of_the_ninth_02Oct 22, 2003 1:05:59 | I want to know why those darn [I'm censoring myself as to prevent the Wizo of this board form ahving to do it] haven't just continued PS. I mean it's the best setting in the game. Period. You really can make no arguement to the contrary, because anything someone might like about a different campaign was part of PS, and it had so much more. And yet it lacked the messed up fakeness of FR. But what am I doing? I'm preacing PS to the PS board, that's like suggesting the Athar practice atheism. However, they do seem to be trying to make the core rules more and more like PS. For example the new DMG has a mini MotP (which was already too small...), and the MM has more PS critters (the gith are now core, as are a couple of fiends and celestials, plus they all have pictures). So it looks like they don't think PS will really sell if they only sell it to those of us who would buy the CS, but if they put it in stuff with non-PS stuff then they can also get more business from us without supporting a failing product. However, I'm still sad because it's all disconnected and crunchy; normaly I like crunchy, but with PS it's just not enough to run a campaign. I miss my fluff, sure I have some of the old PS books, but not all of them, and because they stopped making them I'll never get them. So I think it was simply wrong of them to even mention Sigil in the MotP if they aren't going to say anything else about it. Because what they have is detailed enough that those who don't have the wherewithal to run it might want to but can't, and those who do can, but never needed the description in the first place... ^Well there you go, that's me trying to help keep this thread going without just completely throwing away the topic. Think that'll do? |
#23sildatorakOct 22, 2003 2:41:47 | Originally posted by Lord of the Ninth I'd actually say that the Athar are agnostic. The Powers may not be Gods, but that doesn't mean that the Athar don't think that there isn't a God(s), just that it isn't known/knowable. Hence "The Great Unknown." |
#24zombiegleemaxOct 22, 2003 19:58:09 | Originally posted by Lord of the Ninth Because, no matter HOW they do it, they will lose out. 1. PS is a very niche product, something that won't sell well to Mr Joe Gamer. This is how TSR bellyflopped. However, PS is perfect for a 3rd party publisher, so I don't see why they don't just sell it to someone else. 2. No matter how they update it, people will be mad. I've never seen a more dedicated group of gamers than amongst the Planescapers. Just imagine the cries of despair when the PS Campaign Setting book would be released. 'WotC you suck, DiTerlizzi didn't do all of the art?' 'The General of Gehenna has stats? What the hell?' 'Tanar'ri are Demons?' And so on... On the other side of the spectrum, you have GreyHawk, which is nearly impossible to screw up. So I don't see why a GH book isn't released. However, I can understand WotC not wanting to release PS, they should just sell it to Green Ronin or AEG or something. |
#25Shemeska_the_MarauderOct 23, 2003 3:52:29 | Originally posted by Tertek *Yugolothy glare* Never tried scramblespeak before hmm? Let me put it this way... I know this great experience I'm sure you've never tried before. I can help you experience it. It's called 'die in excruciating pain'. Mortals around me tend to experience that alot. But I can assure you than I make it a novel and long, drawn out experience for all of them. :D |
#26Shemeska_the_MarauderOct 23, 2003 3:59:16 | And well, while it's not going to be published in book format that I'm aware of. We've still got the updated 3e Planescape complete with crunchy stuff (not my thing) and updated and continued storylines and fluff text (my thing definately!) in the works and partially released over at www.planewalker.com I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir here though. I'm sure this gets old after a while, but things are still moving along and things are still being written up. I can speak for myself at least in that regards, though I'm only a cog in a wheel. And frankly none of my contributions have actually made it up on the web yet. *chuckle* Good things come... et al. [Darn I wish I had the ridiculous amount of money needed to buy the PS license. And if anyone else does, I got no problem with that so long as all our work on PW gets used. Heck, buy the license and hire us!] |
#27zombiegleemaxOct 23, 2003 19:58:41 | Originally posted by Shemeska the Marauder "That sounds interesting indeed, Yugolhotty," the tiefling grins crookedly, "When I'm ready to be penned in the dead-book, I'll consider your offer. Until then, I've got a lot of other experiences I need to seek out...none of them including dying." "Besides," he adds as an afterthought, "if you kill me, you'll be out of someone who can get embarassing dark on some of the biggest bloods out there." His grin widens as he points to the picture of drunken Bel. |
#28incenjucarOct 23, 2003 23:18:06 | "Just remember, cutter. She's got more lanned sods begging her favor than the Guvners have recorded laws. You're just a drop in her bucket. But I'll agree on her... temperature. The lass makes the Four Furnaces overheat with but her casual glance... but that goes without saying... ahem.. what were we talking about again...?" |
#29zombiegleemaxOct 26, 2003 9:47:02 | Originally posted by Dackad It's more like this: 1 the designers especially a certain senior one never really understood Planescape and probabbly lost one of their super munchkin characters in a PS game so they hate it. To them Planscape should stay dead because "poor tommy the bullfrog died when he tried to kill the lady" 2 see number 1. I doubt there will be much complaining if it was done right. And wotc could do it right if they wanted too. I don't generally want to see it done third party due to what we've seen with 3e Ravenloft (a pale pale pale version of the original) The only real complaint I would have would be if a stat block appeared on the lady |
#30davethebrave371Oct 26, 2003 12:21:25 | Originally posted by Lord of the Ninth ARRGGGHH!! ANGER AGAIN!!! :thumbsdow :sad: :hoppingma:headexplo |
#31zombiegleemaxOct 31, 2003 23:30:40 | Originally posted by Plunderer_of_the_planes Your haet of woct knoes no limit |
#32zombiegleemaxNov 01, 2003 6:24:43 | I'm sorry, i couldn't understang the gibberish. |
#33zombiegleemaxNov 01, 2003 8:17:36 | Yes but the shoddy typing looks oddly familiar..... |
#34zombiegleemaxNov 01, 2003 20:18:34 | He said: "Your hatred of WotC knows no bounds" Plunderer. |
#35zombiegleemaxNov 01, 2003 21:01:20 | Originally posted by L33t Angel Correction: my hatred of corporations knows no limits.... |
#36Ryltar_SwordsongNov 01, 2003 21:09:05 | I don't hate WotC. I just hate the fact that every book they put out is more focused on rules over story (crunch over fluff). Every book has more feats, spells, PrCs, and races. I love PS cause it focuses on story. |
#37kuje31Nov 01, 2003 21:25:53 | Originally posted by Ryltar Swordsong Here! Here! But then I have been saying this since 3e came out. |
#38zombiegleemaxNov 03, 2003 15:38:55 | Originally posted by Ryltar Swordsong Very true, but you must hate 80% of the 3rd party products as well. ;) I find the 'haet' directed at WotC laughable at best, but that's another topic. |
#39davethebrave371Nov 03, 2003 19:30:50 | Originally posted by Dackad Two points: Can you cite me which companies fall under the 80% who produce more crunchy over story? Because I can honestly say that either that's an exaggeration, or you've sampled five or six 3rd party books. And, as long as we're on the topic (because we are, and you were) why do you find the "haet" directed at Wizards laughable? I'm not trying to argue with you here, just trying to get a viewpoint out of you, as it seems so far that you're content to criticize without a) backing up your point of view or b) provide proof that anyone you disagree with is wrong. I would agree that any hate directed at a corporation is fairly ridiculous, and I have my own reasons. But let's hear yours, if you even have them. |