Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1b4realNov 24, 2003 11:22:29 | I have a 2e RL supplement called ISLANDS OF TERROR. Does anyone else have this supplement? And if so which islands(In this accessory) are gone and which are still around? ~B4Real |
#2zombiegleemaxNov 24, 2003 13:01:38 | Originally posted by B4Real It can generally be assumed to any domains not explicitly mentioned as having been destroyed are still floating in the Mists. Especially since the subject of pocket domains has not even been addressed under SSS's Ravenloft line. (A book on the Nightmare Lands and pocket domains (and maybe some more Islands) was pitched to SSS, but has not made it on to the production schedule. As to specfic things that happened to the IoT domains: Several became parts of Cluster. Nidala is now part of the Shadowlands, the Wildlands and Saragoss joined Sri Raji to become the Verdurous Lands, Timor replaced the sewers of Paridon in the Zherisia cluster, and Pharazia joined the Amber Wastes. Personally, I put much maligned I'Cath in a cluster with Rokushima Taiyoo; this is hardly official though. Scaena and Nosos are pocket domains, and haven't been detailed in 3e. Nor has the island of terror Staunton Bluffs. They can be assumed to still exist, however. There are at least a few more islands and pockets from previous material that haven't been covered in 3e yet which most likely still exist (Farelle springs to mind). Chris Nichols |
#3zombiegleemaxNov 24, 2003 17:42:03 | FWIW, Scaena is alluded to in the RLDMG and Nosos is mentioned by name in Gaz3 (in the Grimetrekker prestige class). |
#4manindarknessNov 24, 2003 18:03:50 | Originally posted by CNichols Nosos is a pocket? Wasn't it an island? If it is pocket, where it is? |
#5john_w._mangrumNov 24, 2003 18:12:03 | Originally posted by ManinDarkness In 3E, we were treating Nosos as a pocket domain. This is because -- using the definition we'd wanted to introduce as early as SotDR -- the defining aspect of a pocket domain would be that it moves. The House of Lament hasn't moved in many years, but it has before and theoretically still could; thus it's a pocket domain. Castle Island, Necropolis, and many of the (physical) island domains in the two seas are located inside larger domains, but they're permanently rooted to the spot, and thus are normal domains, just small. Nosos is unusual for a pocket domain in terms of size and population, but it still moves, so it's a pocket domain. |
#6b4realNov 24, 2003 19:23:16 | Originally posted by John W. Mangrum From what I am reading in this accessory Nosos is a complete dump. ~B4Real |
#7zombiegleemaxNov 24, 2003 20:59:23 | Originally posted by John W. Mangrum [does a quick read through IOT] Interesting. When was it decided that Nosos would move around? |
#8john_w._mangrumNov 25, 2003 1:48:58 | Originally posted by Brandi I don't have my library in front of me (I'm away from home), but I recall IoT mentioning that Nosos can latch on to other lands like a parasite, sticking around long enough for Nosos' inhabitants to ravage the new land's natural resources. |
#9tryst_91Nov 25, 2003 8:29:22 | Personally, i never was a big fan of Nosos. just couldn't see the gothic nature of a trash dump that to me would work better in a more modern setting. (if then) tryst |
#10zombiegleemaxNov 25, 2003 20:42:42 | John: Huh. I'll check again for that. tryst: I keep thinking that somehow Nosos combined with the nameless city of the Thief games would make a fine domain. Think of Malus Scleris as Brother Karras of the Mechanists (Thief II) and you see what I'm getting at. Perhaps the Woodsie Lord wasn't *quite* destroyed, and Scleris sees in that harsh being a resemblance to a druid he once killed... Unfortunately, I've never quite gotten the idea to gel past that. |