Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
---|---|
#1zombiegleemaxSep 11, 2004 16:00:52 | Looking online, I haven't read about any plans to create a source that explains the gods of Dragonlance in detail like "Deities and Demigods" and "Faiths and Pantheons". The DLCS doesn't go into much detail outside a basic description. Does anyone know a place where I can get this information? |
#2iltharanosSep 11, 2004 16:14:50 | Looking online, I haven't read about any plans to create a source that explains the gods of Dragonlance in detail like "Deities and Demigods" and "Faiths and Pantheons". The DLCS doesn't go into much detail outside a basic description. Does anyone know a place where I can get this information? There is a book slated for sometime in 2005 called Holy Orders of the Stars, which will detail the Gods of Krynn and their respective religions. |
#3zombiegleemaxSep 11, 2004 18:29:34 | 2005... can I wait that long? |
#4zombiegleemaxSep 11, 2004 18:39:02 | I don't think it would have killed the people at Wizards to have included Deity's and DemiGods from other game worlds that they know hold the licence for. In the original Deity's book (for 1st edition) they had pretty much every pantheon for earthly religions ever concieved, included Native American Indian Pantheons, Japanese, Chinese, the Aztecs, Egypt, Greece, Norse, and everything else including also Non-Human Deity's. ANd they even had a section on the King Arthur Legends. So why not, in such a book, include a section on the God and Hero's of DragonLance, Mystara, GreyHawk, Ravenloft, etc? It would not have killed them. It probably would have helped sales, as people from different 'worlds' would have gone out to get them. |
#5quentingeorgeSep 11, 2004 20:13:33 | Well, a few reasons really. 1) They don't support those worlds any more, additionally the D&D Pantheon = Scaled down version of Greyhawk pantheon 2) Mystara doesn't have gods, it has "Immortals" 3) The Ravenloft gods aren't real |
#6zombiegleemaxSep 11, 2004 20:51:54 | They put figures from the King Arthur Legends in the original Deity's & DemiGods. FIgures like King Arthur, Lancelot, Merlin, and so on. So how would it have killed them to throw a few bones out to the fan's of all the other Franchises out there, then to have the book done this way... Chapter 1- American Indian Mythos Gods and Figures Chapter 2- The Arthur Figures and hero's. Chapter 3- Central American Mythos/Deity's. Chapter 4- DragonLance Chapter 5- Egyptian and so and and so forth, to include all the stuff that made the book (Norse, Celtic, Nonhuman) with key figures and sections on some of the different worlds out there |
#7Matthew_L._MartinSep 11, 2004 21:03:38 | Well, a few reasons really. They may not be real. We only know of one case where the object of worship is explicitly stated to be nonexistent, that being Zakhata. Ezra, Hala, and the rest are anyone's guess. :-) For those comparing the 1E or 2E deity books to the 3E one, note that the 1E version was pretty much monster descriptions of the gods, and the 2E one didn't do much better. Now, the 3E D&DG spends a lot of time on those as well :-), but the writeups are much more indepth, and the book looks to include a lot more meat on designing and using 'divine' powers. Matthew L. Martin |
#8quentingeorgeSep 11, 2004 21:31:11 | Well, I'm pretty sure that Bane is no longer the entity granting spells to the priests of the Lawgiver, ditto with the RL/FR respective versions of the Morninglord... |
#9MortepierreSep 12, 2004 3:28:11 | There is no hard evidence of that. If we go back to 2E (and the infamous Spelljammer system), the big idea was that some major gods were the same no matter the setting but were worshipped under different names. I don't see why Lathander couldn't be providing spells for clerics of the Morninglords for instance. The only thing that I am reasonably sure of is that the Lawgiver may have been Bane at one time but not all the time. After all, when Bane was considered dead in the FR, it couldn't have been supplying spells to his RL worshippers. So - probably - it was the DP who "stepped in". Now that Bane is back, maybe he is once again the source of their powers. Only the Dark Powers know for sure, and they're not talking... |
#10NivedSep 12, 2004 10:29:32 | DMJoe, It's important to note that there is no 3rd Edition material for Dragonlance. When 3rd edition was being made, and as such Deities and Demigods Wizard's had no intention of ever supporting the setting again. So why would they include those gods? However they decided to change their minds. Sold the license, made the DLCS (for 3.5 mind you so I stand by my none for 3rd statement). Since the license for other books is with Sovereign Press I wouldn't expect to see any Dragonlance stuff to show up in Wizard's game accessories ever again. Case in point? The Monster Manual III. In the Monster Manual III monster descriptions will come with specific places the creatures are found... in Forgotten Realms, and Eberron. Not Greyhawk, not Ravenloft, not Dragonlance, or any of the other bastard children campagins they've shoved off into 'other roleplaying worlds'. |
#11iltharanosSep 12, 2004 10:56:48 | DMJoe, It's important to note that there is no 3rd Edition material for Dragonlance. When 3rd edition was being made, and as such Deities and Demigods Wizard's had no intention of ever supporting the setting again. So why would they include those gods? There actually was 3.0 material for Dragonlance. In the novel Draconian Measures, there were stats for the five different draconian types as well as a magic item. In Dungeon magazine #86, there was the 3.0 Dragonlance adventure Anvil of Time, which had stats on a dragon orb, Magius, Huma, Lord Soth, among others. Of course, both of these products came out after Deities and Demigods, so Nived's quite correct in that at the time the Deities book was being published Wizards didn't have any intent to continue with Dragonlance. |
#12zombiegleemaxSep 12, 2004 11:14:42 | Wasn't aware of Wizards licencing out DRAGONLANCE. Now that I know, obviously, I see why. Stil, from a players standpoint, I dont think it would have killed them to do so. |
#13zombiegleemaxSep 12, 2004 11:39:13 | With as much activity as you have on these boards you were not aware of the licensing? That's a bit shocking. Especially since almost every thread on this board mentions a licensed Dragonlance product. Not to mention the FAQ at the top of the board that pretty much spells it out for ya. That's just shocking that a regular here didn't know. |
#14zombiegleemaxSep 12, 2004 15:08:41 | well, I was not aware that certain products had been let go by Wizards like they had. I was under the impression even if someone else is making a supplement, that it was still under the "wizard" banner. |
#15wolffenjugend_dupSep 12, 2004 19:04:53 | It will be much better to see the DL deities in their own book rather than as an add-on for the sake of completeness in the Deities & Demigods book. Think about it: would you rather have 1 page per deity or 200+ pages devoted to the 2 dozen or so DL deities? I know which I prefer. I do wish SP would come out and state if the book will in fact be out in 2005 though. Cuz I really don't want to hear in January that it's been moved back to 2006... |
#16zombiegleemaxSep 12, 2004 21:31:25 | It will be much better to see the DL deities in their own book rather than as an add-on for the sake of completeness in the Deities & Demigods book. I have not read a DEITYS AND DEMIGODS book in earnest since the 1st edition version back in the late 80's. In it, I thought they did an outstanding job in giving you the jist of the Hero's and Gods and GOddess of the many, many earthly mythos out there. From Hercules of the Greeks to Thor of the Asgardian gods, to Lolth of the Drow to King Arthur himself, They presented stats, background bio and stuff. I thought they did a good job of it. Why not have a well done chapters within the book done. If we go by our own DLCS, I believe there are pages 119 to 132 (front and back) on the DragonLance gods in it, so It seems that it would not have killed them to do it that way. |
#17wolffenjugend_dupSep 12, 2004 21:48:42 | As you said, the DLCS has the deities information so why would they reprint it in Deities in Demigods? Seems like a duplicated waste of space to me. Besides, I'd much rather have an entire BOOK devoted to the DL faiths than a few pages. |
#18zombiegleemaxSep 13, 2004 8:48:51 | There is a book slated for sometime in 2005 called Holy Orders of the Stars, which will detail the Gods of Krynn and their respective religions. Which authors have been assigned to work on this supposed tome, if any... ? |
#19iltharanosSep 13, 2004 8:53:24 | Which authors have been assigned to work on this supposed tome, if any... ? I don't think it has been mentioned anywhere, but my guess would be Jamie Chambers at least, and possibly another co-author. |
#20zombiegleemaxSep 14, 2004 8:53:16 | I hope that it will be as good as Towers of High Sorcery! |
#21zombiegleemaxSep 14, 2004 14:28:39 | Which authors have been assigned to work on this supposed tome, if any... ? Well, let's see... Currently the authors for Holy Orders of the Stars are: Myself Margaret Weis Chris Pierson Cam Banks Trampas Whiteman Joe Mashuga Sean Macdonald Andre LaRoche Jamie Chambers Jennifer Brozek Christopher Coyle I'm the project manager for that book, which means I'm in charge of making it happen. Right now we're tenatively looking at a March 2005 release, but that is not set in stone. I will tell you though that nearly 1/3 of the book is finished already. |
#22iltharanosSep 14, 2004 14:32:19 | Well, let's see... Sweet Aunt Jemimah, that's cool. |
#23zombiegleemaxSep 15, 2004 10:23:40 | You guys are going all out on this work? Good for you. Any chance it will be out before March 05? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE |
#24cam_banksSep 15, 2004 10:40:05 | You guys are going all out on this work? Good for you. Any chance it will be out before March 05? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE Why, is something happening in March of 2005? Cheers, Cam |
#25zombiegleemaxSep 15, 2004 10:47:05 | Cam, the Holy Order of the Stars book is supposed to be released in 03 2005!! HOORAY HOORAY! |
#26zombiegleemaxSep 19, 2004 22:36:32 | I would hope that they are never stated. They are never really shown to have character classes but as beings that have always been gods. Sometimes you get beings like Fizban and thats well and good but it just does not seem like the gods have been detailed enough to know who has what. Plus its just going to make people upset one way or another. |
#27zombiegleemaxSep 21, 2004 23:32:53 | I would hope that they are never stated. They are never really shown to have character classes but as beings that have always been gods. Sometimes you get beings like Fizban and thats well and good but it just does not seem like the gods have been detailed enough to know who has what. Plus its just going to make people upset one way or another. I doubt they'll be statted. DL, unlike Greyhawk and FR, has a set pantheon without ascended or interloper gods. |
#28zombiegleemaxSep 22, 2004 12:35:36 | Grrr.. I typed out a long reply and then my browser crashed on me. I'll try and condense it now Basically I don't see why the deities cannot be statted in Rpg terms. They are no more or less gods then the deities in the Forgotten Realms setting. They represent character archetypes and possess vast divine power. Honestly if you understand the mechanics behind Faiths and Pantheons/Deities and Demigods..it's actually kinda cool and puts a lot of perspective onto the behind the scenes cosmology. Suddenly the political manipulating and behind the scenes manuevering takes on a whole new level when you can tangibly envision the gods - and more now then before the deities are really taking on a lot more personality and hands on interacting with one another and the mortals in the recent direction of Dragonlance. They're no longer abstract and unfleshed out beings. Also while there are no 'ascended' mortals thus far in Dragonlance, the game world makes it quite clear that the deities are not invulnerable and stack up against one another and other beings in terms of powers. In order for Huma to wound Takhisis with the dragonlance on the material plane - Takhisis 'avatar' would need to have had stats. In order for Raistlin to defeat Takhisis on the material plane after drawing her out of the abyss, Takhisis would need stats. In order for Chaos to be challenged by the gods - he would need stats and so would the rest of the gods. Deities can die in Dragonlance and mortals can take their place. Raistlin could have done it theoretically (albiet with catostrophic results) and Gilean was once mortal. (This is from a pure RPG perspective. Naturally from the perspective of the novels they aren't rolling 1d20+whatever against each other.) I don't think we'll see stats done anyway though. WOTC has said they hav eno more plans for deity books on the same scale as Faiths and Pantheons because the demand isn't as high for them. I imagine Sov. Press feels much th esame way and will likely not stat the gods - but that doesn't mean they cannot be statted or that there's no justification to do it. For a homebrew campaign I once statted a deity that was a parallel to Paladine. He came out with 20 levels of Paladin and 20 levels of Cleric. (Most deities are made up of 40 HD of class levels plus 20 HD of outsider I believe.) I then went on and added a few more levels just to flavor him up some. Paladine would probably be like the above and either have a few more levels in fighter and wizard. Fizban, as an avatar, could mimic alot of 'spells' via his deity salient divine abilities (A fancy name for deity powers .. like turning you into a pillar of salt.) |